Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright Cases, Volume 909U.S. Government Printing Office, 1910 - Copyright "Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U.S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 77
Page 15
... MOTION TO DISSOLVE - TRANSMISSION . A motion to dissolve should not be transmitted where it appears that the moving party had had an opportunity to bring a motion to dissolve on the same ground in a prior interference involving the same ...
... MOTION TO DISSOLVE - TRANSMISSION . A motion to dissolve should not be transmitted where it appears that the moving party had had an opportunity to bring a motion to dissolve on the same ground in a prior interference involving the same ...
Page 16
... motion for dissolution was filed setting forth ( 1 ) that all the counts of the issue are unpatentable to the party Young in view of his Patents Nos . 757,537 and 762,370 , and ( 2 ) that the party Young has no right to make claims ...
... motion for dissolution was filed setting forth ( 1 ) that all the counts of the issue are unpatentable to the party Young in view of his Patents Nos . 757,537 and 762,370 , and ( 2 ) that the party Young has no right to make claims ...
Page 27
... MOTION TO AMEnd . C.'s motion to amend his preliminary statement was denied by the Ex- aminer of Interferences . He ... dissolve the interference and to shift the burden of proof . The former motion was denied by the Primary Examiner on ...
... MOTION TO AMEnd . C.'s motion to amend his preliminary statement was denied by the Ex- aminer of Interferences . He ... dissolve the interference and to shift the burden of proof . The former motion was denied by the Primary Examiner on ...
Page 56
... MOTION . TROLLEY - RETRIEVER . Mr. Samuel E. Darby for Earll . Messrs ... dissolve the above- entitled interference as to ground one thereof and as to ... motion for dissolution . The refusal to transmit the first ground of the motion is ...
... MOTION . TROLLEY - RETRIEVER . Mr. Samuel E. Darby for Earll . Messrs ... dissolve the above- entitled interference as to ground one thereof and as to ... motion for dissolution . The refusal to transmit the first ground of the motion is ...
Page 57
... motion to amend under Rule 109 could not have been filed , as the moving party is a patentee , the failure to include claims not patentably different from the issue furnishes no ground for dissolution ... dissolve the interference on the ...
... motion to amend under Rule 109 could not have been filed , as the moving party is a patentee , the failure to include claims not patentably different from the issue furnishes no ground for dissolution ... dissolve the interference on the ...
Contents
80 | |
84 | |
89 | |
93 | |
96 | |
105 | |
108 | |
109 | |
112 | |
116 | |
140 | |
141 | |
146 | |
151 | |
165 | |
170 | |
184 | |
186 | |
199 | |
200 | |
212 | |
216 | |
220 | |
225 | |
228 | |
233 | |
238 | |
239 | |
247 | |
251 | |
340 | |
356 | |
365 | |
370 | |
381 | |
386 | |
398 | |
411 | |
440 | |
444 | |
461 | |
471 | |
476 | |
479 | |
483 | |
530 | |
536 | |
556 | |
564 | |
569 | |
573 | |
580 | |
585 | |
586 | |
587 | |
592 | |
597 | |
598 | |
605 | |
619 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abandoned action affidavit affirmed alleged amendment apparatus appellant's appellee applicant's assignment Assistant Commissioner attorney awarding priority California Fruit Canners circuit cited claims Commissioner of Patents Company Conner construction contended counts Court of Appeals Decided decision declaration denied described descriptive properties device direct current disclosed disclosure District of Columbia divisional application drawings entitled evidence Examiner of Interferences Examiner of Trade-Marks Examiners-in-Chief eyelet fact February February 20 Ferranti filed his application flange granted ground hearth heat held interference proceeding invention in issue inventor involved machine manufacture mark matter means mechanism Messrs metal motion to dissolve oath operation opinion original application party Patent Office petition preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior art priority of invention prosecution purpose question reason record reduction to practice references refused registration reissue reissue application reopen res adjudicata Rule shown specification sufficient thereof thereto tion trade Trade-Mark Act transmit
Popular passages
Page 535 - Act or by treaty; or when such foreign state or nation is a party to an international agreement which provides for reciprocity in the granting of copyright, by the terms of which agreement the United States may, at its pleasure, become a party thereto...
Page 535 - The existence of the reciprocal conditions aforesaid shall be determined by the President of the United States, by proclamation made from time to time, as the purposes of this Act may require.
Page 427 - That no mark which consists merely in the name of an individual, firm, corporation, or association not written, printed, impressed, or woven in some particular or distinctive manner...
Page 37 - Office a written description of the same, and of the manner and process of making, constructing, compounding and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art or science to which it appertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make, construct, compound, and use the same; and in case of a machine, he shall explain the principle thereof, and the best mode in which he has contemplated applying that principle, so as to distinguish it from...
Page 480 - ... and a statement of the mode in which the same is applied and affixed to goods, and the length of time during which the trade-mark has been used.
Page 267 - States shall have the same force and effect as the same application would have if filed in this country on the date on which the application for patent for the same invention...
Page 263 - Whoever, having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify. declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true, is guilty of perjury, and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided...
Page 541 - No person otherwise entitled thereto shall be debarred from receiving a patent for his invention or discovery, nor shall any patent be declared invalid by reason of its having been first patented or caused to be patented by the inventor or his legal representatives. or assigns in a foreign country...
Page 537 - That whenever, by mistake, accident, or inadvertence, and without any wilful default or intent to defraud or mislead the public, any patentee shall have in his specification claimed to be the original and first inventor or discoverer...
Page 30 - If it appear after a hearing before the examiner that the registrant was not entitled to the mark at or since the date of his application for registration thereof...