Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright Cases, Volume 909U.S. Government Printing Office, 1910 - Copyright "Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U.S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 17
... described in such application and carried out by the apparatus illustrated therein . It is stated that the process claim would have to be made in another application and that it would therefore not be necessary to withdraw the allowed ...
... described in such application and carried out by the apparatus illustrated therein . It is stated that the process claim would have to be made in another application and that it would therefore not be necessary to withdraw the allowed ...
Page 60
... described , the Commissioner must likewise consider it in its entirety . We are of the opinion that , in this case , he should have de- nied registration as claimed , giving the applicant , at the same time , an oppor- tunity to amend ...
... described , the Commissioner must likewise consider it in its entirety . We are of the opinion that , in this case , he should have de- nied registration as claimed , giving the applicant , at the same time , an oppor- tunity to amend ...
Page 85
... described and shown , and , in fact , the Examiner does not claim that he does not understand the invention . He states that with- out further illustration it would be impossible to classify the applica- tion and hardly possible to ...
... described and shown , and , in fact , the Examiner does not claim that he does not understand the invention . He states that with- out further illustration it would be impossible to classify the applica- tion and hardly possible to ...
Page 86
... described and shown , although its specific application is not illustrated . Moreover , in the decision cited there is no authority to refuse to act upon the merits . The decision of the Commissioner in the case of ex parte Hinkle and ...
... described and shown , although its specific application is not illustrated . Moreover , in the decision cited there is no authority to refuse to act upon the merits . The decision of the Commissioner in the case of ex parte Hinkle and ...
Page 110
... described , and aside from the counts at issue in this interference . But if the Ambruster & Beck device is operated so as to perform the purposes and functions described in the specification , it will not operate to perform the ...
... described , and aside from the counts at issue in this interference . But if the Ambruster & Beck device is operated so as to perform the purposes and functions described in the specification , it will not operate to perform the ...
Contents
80 | |
84 | |
89 | |
93 | |
96 | |
105 | |
108 | |
109 | |
112 | |
116 | |
140 | |
141 | |
146 | |
151 | |
165 | |
170 | |
184 | |
186 | |
199 | |
200 | |
212 | |
216 | |
220 | |
225 | |
228 | |
233 | |
238 | |
239 | |
247 | |
251 | |
340 | |
356 | |
365 | |
370 | |
381 | |
386 | |
398 | |
411 | |
440 | |
444 | |
461 | |
471 | |
476 | |
479 | |
483 | |
530 | |
536 | |
556 | |
564 | |
569 | |
573 | |
580 | |
585 | |
586 | |
587 | |
592 | |
597 | |
598 | |
605 | |
619 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abandoned action affidavit affirmed alleged amendment apparatus appellant's appellee applicant's assignment Assistant Commissioner attorney awarding priority California Fruit Canners circuit cited claims Commissioner of Patents Company Conner construction contended counts Court of Appeals Decided decision declaration denied described descriptive properties device direct current disclosed disclosure District of Columbia divisional application drawings entitled evidence Examiner of Interferences Examiner of Trade-Marks Examiners-in-Chief eyelet fact February February 20 Ferranti filed his application flange granted ground hearth heat held interference proceeding invention in issue inventor involved machine manufacture mark matter means mechanism Messrs metal motion to dissolve oath operation opinion original application party Patent Office petition preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior art priority of invention prosecution purpose question reason record reduction to practice references refused registration reissue reissue application reopen res adjudicata Rule shown specification sufficient thereof thereto tion trade Trade-Mark Act transmit
Popular passages
Page 535 - Act or by treaty; or when such foreign state or nation is a party to an international agreement which provides for reciprocity in the granting of copyright, by the terms of which agreement the United States may, at its pleasure, become a party thereto...
Page 535 - The existence of the reciprocal conditions aforesaid shall be determined by the President of the United States, by proclamation made from time to time, as the purposes of this Act may require.
Page 427 - That no mark which consists merely in the name of an individual, firm, corporation, or association not written, printed, impressed, or woven in some particular or distinctive manner...
Page 37 - Office a written description of the same, and of the manner and process of making, constructing, compounding and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art or science to which it appertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make, construct, compound, and use the same; and in case of a machine, he shall explain the principle thereof, and the best mode in which he has contemplated applying that principle, so as to distinguish it from...
Page 480 - ... and a statement of the mode in which the same is applied and affixed to goods, and the length of time during which the trade-mark has been used.
Page 267 - States shall have the same force and effect as the same application would have if filed in this country on the date on which the application for patent for the same invention...
Page 263 - Whoever, having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify. declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true, is guilty of perjury, and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided...
Page 541 - No person otherwise entitled thereto shall be debarred from receiving a patent for his invention or discovery, nor shall any patent be declared invalid by reason of its having been first patented or caused to be patented by the inventor or his legal representatives. or assigns in a foreign country...
Page 537 - That whenever, by mistake, accident, or inadvertence, and without any wilful default or intent to defraud or mislead the public, any patentee shall have in his specification claimed to be the original and first inventor or discoverer...
Page 30 - If it appear after a hearing before the examiner that the registrant was not entitled to the mark at or since the date of his application for registration thereof...