Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright CasesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1894 - Copyright "Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U. S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 7
... held , on the one hand , that a word and a picture which are true alternatives and which inevitably express the same idea may be covered by one registration . It is also held , on the other hand , that there can- not be covered by one ...
... held , on the one hand , that a word and a picture which are true alternatives and which inevitably express the same idea may be covered by one registration . It is also held , on the other hand , that there can- not be covered by one ...
Page 15
... held with reference to the last- named motion that the record afforded " ample explanation why the same was not brought within the next twenty days , " and ordered that the motion " be transmitted to the Primary Examiner for his action ...
... held with reference to the last- named motion that the record afforded " ample explanation why the same was not brought within the next twenty days , " and ordered that the motion " be transmitted to the Primary Examiner for his action ...
Page 16
... held that motions to reopen an interference case and all similar motions should be brought in the first instance before the Examiner of Interferences . In view of what has been said above , it follows , with respect to the second reason ...
... held that motions to reopen an interference case and all similar motions should be brought in the first instance before the Examiner of Interferences . In view of what has been said above , it follows , with respect to the second reason ...
Page 57
... held that the Commis- sioner would not be warranted in granting the motion . The decision of the Examiner of Interferences is affirmed . EX PARTE WILSON . Decided February 16 , 1893 . 63 O. G. , 465 . ADDITIONAL Oath Under Paragraph 3 ...
... held that the Commis- sioner would not be warranted in granting the motion . The decision of the Examiner of Interferences is affirmed . EX PARTE WILSON . Decided February 16 , 1893 . 63 O. G. , 465 . ADDITIONAL Oath Under Paragraph 3 ...
Page 58
... held to be an unreasonable time under all the circumstances of the particular cases . In the case of ex parte Steitz ( 42 MS . Dec. , 352 ) it appears that the application was not filed until fifty - six days after the execution of the ...
... held to be an unreasonable time under all the circumstances of the particular cases . In the case of ex parte Steitz ( 42 MS . Dec. , 352 ) it appears that the application was not filed until fifty - six days after the execution of the ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action amended apparatus appeal appellee application assignment bill Cable Railway carbons Circuit Court coiling combination Commissioner of Patents complainant complainant's connected construction court of equity covered Dalzell Decided decision decree defendant's defendants demurrer device District divisional application Electric entitled equity evidence fact filed gage granted Held Huson improvement interference proceeding invention inventor issued James Boyle label lamp Letters Patent lock machine Manufacturing Company mechanism ment Messrs metal motion operation opinion original patent party patent in suit Patent Office patentable novelty petition pipe piston plaintiffs plate practice preliminary injunction present prior prior art purpose question rawhide reason reduction to practice registration reissue reissue application rejected Revised Statutes rule second claim shown skein specification substantially as described Supreme Court sustained tank testimony thereof tion Trade-Mark U. S. Circuit United States patent validity words
Popular passages
Page 516 - ... thereof, as the facts in the case may appear. And such adjudication, if it be in favor of the right of the applicant, shall authorize the commissioner to issue such patent on the applicant filing in the Patent Office a copy of the adjudication and otherwise complying with the requirements of law. In all cases where there is no opposing party a copy of the bill shall be served on the commissioner ; and all the expenses of the proceedings shall be paid by the applicant, whether the final decision...
Page 184 - Any person who has invented or discovered any new and useful art, machine, manufacture or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, not known or used by others in this country before his invention or discovery thereof...
Page 278 - ... not known or used by others in this country before his invention or discovery thereof, and not patented or described in any printed publication in this or any foreign country before his invention or discovery thereof...
Page 278 - ... or more than two years prior to his application, and not in public use or on sale in this country for more than two years prior to his application, unless the same is proved to have been abandoned, may, upon payment of the fees required by law, and other due proceeding had, obtain a patent therefor.
Page 116 - It is, we think, a sound principle that, when a government becomes a partner in any trading company, it divests itself, so far as concerns the transactions of that company, of its sovereign character, and takes that of a private citizen. Instead of communicating to the company its privileges and its prerogatives, it descends to a level with those with whom it associates itself, and takes the character which belongs to its associates, and to the business which is to be transacted.
Page 419 - No one can claim protection for the exclusive use of a trade-mark or trade-name which would practically give him a monopoly in the sale of any goods other than those produced or made by himself. If he could, the public would be injured rather than protected, for competition would be destroyed. .Nor can a generic name, or a name merely descriptive of an article of trade, of its qualities, ingredients, or characteristics, be employed as a trade-mark and the exclusive use of it be entitled to legal...
Page 8 - ... after any action therein, of which notice shall have been given to the applicant, they shall be regarded as abandoned by the parties thereto, unless it be shown to the satisfaction of the Commissioner of Patents that such delay was unavoidable.
Page 197 - ... the application of an old process or machine to a similar or analogous subject, with no change in the manner of application, and no result substantially distinct in its nature, will not sustain a patent, even if the new form of result has not before been contemplated.
Page 114 - That in the construction of this act, the words "engraving," 20 "cut" and "print" shall be applied only to pictorial illustrations or works connected with the fine arts, and no prints or labels designed to be used for any other articles of manufacture shall be entered under the copyright law, but may be registered in the Patent Office.
Page 22 - engraving, cut, and print* shall be applied only to pictorial illustrations or works connected with the fine arts, and no prints or labels designed to be used for any other articles of manufacture shall be entered under the copyright law, but may be registered in the Patent Office. And...