The Southwestern Reporter, Volume 126West Publishing Company, 1910 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 51
... amount of lumber delivered , made about 606 , - Dreyfuss v . Foster ( City Ct . ) 3 N. Y. Supp . 000 feet which had been delivered under the 54. The inconsistency goes , at least , to the contract , leaving about 424,000 feet still un ...
... amount of lumber delivered , made about 606 , - Dreyfuss v . Foster ( City Ct . ) 3 N. Y. Supp . 000 feet which had been delivered under the 54. The inconsistency goes , at least , to the contract , leaving about 424,000 feet still un ...
Page 60
... amount to be charg ed against said property at a sum equal to the benefit to the property and thereafter as- sess said amount against same . " Sec . 4. If after due consideration of all of the objections filed as provided in preced- ing ...
... amount to be charg ed against said property at a sum equal to the benefit to the property and thereafter as- sess said amount against same . " Sec . 4. If after due consideration of all of the objections filed as provided in preced- ing ...
Page 63
... amount necessary to pay the cost of constructing the improvement in front of each respective piece of property , that is to say , there is hereby levied and assessed against Mrs. H. L. Brenneman the sum of $ 448.00 , which shall be a ...
... amount necessary to pay the cost of constructing the improvement in front of each respective piece of property , that is to say , there is hereby levied and assessed against Mrs. H. L. Brenneman the sum of $ 448.00 , which shall be a ...
Page 103
... amount of the verdict , should one be returned for plaintiff . We do not think that under the circumstances of the case , and in the light of the amount re- It appears that on March 19 , 1908 , the returned , this argument worked to the ...
... amount of the verdict , should one be returned for plaintiff . We do not think that under the circumstances of the case , and in the light of the amount re- It appears that on March 19 , 1908 , the returned , this argument worked to the ...
Page 135
... amount of his debt and the date of its payment . As executed by the appellee , the note showed that it was made in Paducah , that it was a Kentucky contract , and was to be governed by the laws of this state . The date of the note , the ...
... amount of his debt and the date of its payment . As executed by the appellee , the note showed that it was made in Paducah , that it was a Kentucky contract , and was to be governed by the laws of this state . The date of the note , the ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action adverse possession affirmed agent alleged amount Appeal and Error Appeal from Circuit appellant appellant's appellee assignment bank bill bills of lading Bowie county carrier cause Cent certificates charge Chicot county Circuit Court Civil Appeals claim contract contributory negligence Court of Civil CRIMINAL LAW damages deceased decree deed defendant defendant's dence duty employé estoppel evidence facts fendant filed held injury instruction issue Judge judgment jury land liable lien Louis lumber March 16 Maries county Master and Servant ment Missouri motion negligence Note.-For paid party payment pellant person petition plaintiff plaintiff in error pleaded purchase question railroad company Railway Company reason received record recover reversed riprap rule statement statute street suit testified testimony Texas thereof tiff timber tion track train trial court try title verdict witness
Popular passages
Page 91 - A statement of the acts constituting the offense, in ordinary and concise language, and in such manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended.
Page 116 - That it is complete and regular upon its face; 2. That he became the holder of it before it was overdue, and without notice that it had been previously dishonored, if such was the fact; 3. That he took it in good faith and for value; 4. That at the time it was negotiated to him he had no notice of any infirmity in the instrument or defect in the title of the person negotiating it.
Page 132 - Where the instrument is wanting in any material particular, the person in possession thereof has a prima facie authority to complete it by filling up the blanks therein. And a signature on a blank paper delivered by the person making the signature in order that the paper may be converted into a negotiable instrument operates as a prima facie authority to fill it up as such for any amount.
Page 132 - Where a negotiable instrument is materially altered without the assent of all parties liable thereon, it is avoided, except as against a party who has himself made, authorized or assented to the alteration, and subsequent indorsers. But...
Page 116 - Where the holder has a lien on the instrument, arising either from contract or by implication of law, he is deemed a holder for value to the extent of his lien.
Page 91 - That the act or omission charged as the offense, is stated with such a degree of certainty as to enable the court to pronounce judgment upon a conviction, according to the right of the case.
Page 116 - Where value has at any time been given for the instrument, the holder is deemed a holder for value in respect to all parties who became such prior to that time.
Page 54 - The court charged the jury that if they found from the evidence that the...
Page 253 - In the event of disagreement as to the amount of loss the same shall, as above provided, be ascertained by two competent and disinterested appraisers, the insured and this company each selecting one, and the two so chosen shall first select a competent and disinterested umpire; the appraisers together shall then estimate and appraise the loss; stating separately sound value and damage, and, failing to agree, shall submit their differences to the umpire; and the award in writing of any two shall determine...
Page 50 - He may keep the property as his own, and recover the difference between the market price at the time and place of delivery and the contract price": Dustan v.