Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

AMENDMENT TO RULES1

COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI

Rules of Practice in the St. Louis Court of Appeals

Rule 24 is hereby amended to read as follows:

126 S.W.

"Rule 24.-ORAL ARGUMENTS. When a cause is called for argument, the appellant will make his statement and proceed with bis argument; the respondent will thereupon make his statement and proceed with his argument, the appellant replying, if he desires, and if he has not consumed all of his time in opening. The whole time consumed by either party in statement and argument shall not exceed sixty (60) minutes, unless the court, for cause shown, and on application made before the commencement of the argument in the case, shall otherwise order: Provided, however, that the court may, in its discretion shorten the time for argument in

any case; and provided further, that in appeals in causes originating before a justice of the peace, the time for argument shall not exceed thirty (30) minutes on each side.

Cross-appeals shall be treated as one cause, and the plaintiff in the trial court shall be entitled to open and close the argument.

When two or more cases are heard together, the court, in its discretion, will allot the time to be given for argument.

Unless by permission of the court, counsel will not read to the court in extenso the written or printed argument on file, nor from reports or text books.

The above rule to be in force and effect on and after June 6, 1910.

1 For rule as previously adopted, see 123 S. W. v.

SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 2

4. Upon refusal by this court of an appli- | in case one in which some new argument is cation for a writ of error, the clerk shall retain the application, together with the transcript and accompanying papers, for fifteen days from the day of the rendition of the judgment refusing the writ. At the end of which time, if no motion for a rehearing has been filed, or upon the overruling or the dismissal of such motion in case one has been filed, he shall transmit to the clerk of the Court of Civil Appeals to which the writ of error was sought to be sued out a certified copy of the orders of this court denying such application, and overruling the motion for rehearing, in case such motion has been filed; and shall return the file papers of that court to the clerk thereof, but shall not return the petition for the writ of error. A motion for a rehearing of an application is not a matter of right. But

urged upon one or more points in the application, or some new authority is cited, is filed during the term in which the judgment refusing the application is rendered, it may be considered; provided it be confined to the new matter presented. Motions for rehearing of applications filed after the adjournment for the term can not be considered. The presentation of any point previously presented in the application, without urging some new argument or citing some new authority, will be deemed a sufficient ground for dismissing the motion.

7. Causes in this court will be regularly submitted on Wednesday of each week, though a case may be set down for submission upon another day by the permission or direction of the court. Amended March 15, 1906.

2 For rules as previously adopted, see 67 S. W. xi.
(v)*

CASES REPORTED

Page .1002

Abeles, Bass v. (Mo. App.).... Abeles, Southwestern Telegraph & phone Co. v. (Ark.)..

724

336

730

A. B. Patterson & Co. v. Gulf, C. &
R. Co. (Tex. Civ. App.).
Acklen v. Thompson (Tenn.).
Adams, State v. (Tex. Civ. App.).
Adkins, Texas & P. R. Co. v. (Tex.
App.)

674

Civ.

954

A. G. Edwards & Sons Brokerage Co., Atwater v. (Mo. App.)...

823

A. J. Deer Co., Melvin v. (Tex. Civ. App.) 681
Albright v. Stevenson (Mo.)...
Allen v. Daniel (Ark.)

.1027
384
124

Allen, Floyd County v. (Ky.).
Allen Marble Works v. Knighton (Ark.).. 391
Allen v. Metropolitan St. R. Co. (Mo. App.) 254
Allen v. State (Tex. Cr. App.)...
Alt v. Dines (Mo.)...

......

571 .1035 968

622

815

Tele

S. F.

[ocr errors]

Altes, Busby v. (Mo. App.).
Alvord Nat. Bank v. Ferguson (Tex. Civ.
App.)

American Car & Foundry Co., Panos v. (Mo. App.).

Armor v. Frey (Mo.)...

Armor v. Holly (Mo.).

American Feed & Grocery Co., Pelican Assur. Co. v. (Tenn.).

Anderson, Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co. v. (Tex. Civ. App.)..

Andrews, Reynolds & Co., Texas & P. R. Co. v. (Tex.)...

Angelina County, Carter-Kelly Lumber Co. v. (Tex. Civ. App.)..

Aquilla State Bank v. Knight (Tex. Civ. App.)

Arkansas Retail Credit Men's Ass'n v. Lester (Ark.)....

Arkansas Southwestern R. Co. v. Wingfield (Ark.)

Arnett, Garrison v. (Tex. Civ. App.). Arnold v. Railway Steel Spring Co. (Mo.

App.)

1085

928

562

Baker v. Metropolitan St. R. Co. (Mo.
A pp.)

Ballard v. Bowie County (Tex. Civ. App.)
Ball v. Belden (Tex. Civ. App.)..
Bank of Delight, Barham v. (Ark.).
Bank of Eastern Arkansas v. Bank of For-
rest City (Ark.).

Bank of Forrest City, Bank of Eastern Ar

293

893

712

76 483 495 611

795 366 589

Asher, Pace v. (Ky.).

Ashley v. State (Tex. Cr. App.).

Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. v. Seeger (Tex.
Civ. App.)..

.1170 Athens Cotton Oil Co. v. Clark (Tex. Civ. App.)

322

323

Athens Cotton Oil Co. v. Harper (Tex. Civ.
App.)
Atwater v. A. G. Edwards & Sons Brok-
erage Co. (Mo. App.).

823

Austin, Chesapeake & O. R. Co. v. (Ky.).. 144 Axtell, Van Zandt-Moore Iron Works v.

(Tex. Civ. App.)....

930

764 56 20 394

837

kansas v. (Ark.)..

837

Banner Rubber Co., Scheurer v. (Mo.)....1037
Bantley Realty Co., Simpson v. (Mo. App.) 999
Barber, Oden v. (Tex. Civ. App.).
Barham v. Bank of Delight (Ark.).
Barnard v. Metropolitan St. R. Co.

676
394

...

App.)
Barnes v. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co.
App.)
Barr v. Lake (Mo. App.).

(Mo.

516 (Mo. ..1198 755

Bass v. Abeles (Mo. App.)..
Beggs, School Dist. of Fredericktown ex
rel. Fredericktown Brick Co. v. (Mo.
App.)

Page ...1002

Beggs, School Dist. of Fredericktown ex rel. Fredericktown Lumber Co. v. (Mo. App.)

Belcher v. Harr (Ark.)..

Belden, Ball v. (Tex. Civ. App.).
Bell, Sarro v. (Tex. Civ. App.).
Bennett, Fincher v. (Ark.).
Bennett, Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co. v. (Tex.
Civ. App.).....

Bercher, Coleman v. (Ark.).
Betzler v. James (Mo.)..

607 ..1070 .1007

Bevill, German Ins. Co. v. (Tex. Civ. App.) 31
Beyer-Knox Co. v. Ewell (Mo. App.).
Bick v. Dixon (Mo. App.).
Bick v. Umstadtt (Mo. App.).

229 235

236

...

Bigham Bros. v. Port Arthur Canal & Dock
Co. (Tex. Civ. App.)..
Blais v. State (Ark.).
Blakemore, State v. (Mo.).
Blanchard v. Olds Gasoline Engine Works
(Mo. App.).

324 .1064 429

828

Bland & Stratton, Southern R. Co. in Kentucky v. (Ky.)..........

Blanton, Nunley v. (Tex.).

.1198 .....1110 570

Blount v. State (Tex. Cr. App.)..

Blythe, St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. (Ark.) 386
Board of Directors St. Francis Levee Dist.,
Hall v. (Ark.).

Boesch, Texas Cent. R. Co. v. (Tex.)..
Bomar v. Morris (Tex. Civ. App.)...
Boothe, Crystal City & U. R. Co. v. (Tex.
Civ. App.)...

530

...

Booth, King v. (Ark.).

700 830

Boppart v. Illinois Surety Co. (Mo. App.) 768 Bowen v. Kansas City (Mo. App.). 790

Bowie County, Ballard v. (Tex. Civ. App.) 56 Bowling v. Commonwealth (Ky.). 360 Boyman v. State (Tex. Cr. App.). .1142 Bradley Gin Co. v. J. L. Means Machinery Co. (Ark.)....

Bradley Lumber Co. v. Miller & Daniels
(Ark.)

Branch, State v. (Mo. App.).
Brandon v. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. (Mo.
App.)

Brandon, Texarkana & Ft. S. R. Co. v.
(Tex. Civ. App.).
Brannock v. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. (Mo.
App.)

[ocr errors]

Burke v. Trabue's Ex'x (Ky.)

Burnitt, Easterwood v. (Tex. Civ. App.)..
Burns v. Burns (Tex. Civ. App.).

Burns, First Nat. Bank v. (Tex. Civ. App.)
Busby v. Altes (Mo. App.)..
Bush v. Wheeler (Ark.)..

532

714

20

24

392

79 8 663

Brauckman v. Hargadine-McKittrick Dry
Goods Co. (Mo. App.)........
Breece, Felker v. (Mo.).

Breen v. Morehead (Tex. Civ. App.)....
Brenneman, City of Paris v. (Tex. Civ.
App.)

Brice, International & G. N. R. Co. v.
(Tex. Civ. App.)..

Broom, McKinley v. (Ark.)
Brouillette, Texas & N. O. R. Co. v. (Tex.
Civ. App.).

287
93
17

Browne v. Bentonville (Ark.).
Brown, Feigelson v. (Tex. Civ. App.).
Brown, McLaughlin v. (Tex. Civ. App.).. 292
Burford, Wells Fargo & Co. v. (Tex. Civ.
App.)

81

98

793

521

703

552

791 424 650

58

613

391

927 125

934

333

34

968 80

[blocks in formation]

Campbell, Gaither v. (Ark.).
Campbell, Winn v. (Ark.).
Cape Girardeau & C. R. Co., Hahs v. (Mo.
App.)

524 ..1068

Carr, Miller v. (Ark.).
Carr, St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. (Ark.).. 850
Carstens Packing Co., Paris Oil & Cotton
Co. v. (Tex. Civ. App.)...
Carter-Kelly Lumber Co. v. Angelina Coun-
ty (Tex. Civ. App.)

1182

....

293

Carter, St. Louis, I. M. & S. R. Co. v. (Ark.)

99

Caruthersville Hardware Co., Stout v. (Mo.
App.)

.1199
600
914

Cassidy v. State (Tex. Cr. App.).
Caswell, Yates v. (Tex. Civ. App.)..
C. C. & H. Min. & Mill. Co., Hays v. (Mo.) 1051
Central Kentucky Traction Co. v. May

(Ky.)

..

Chappell v. State (Tex. Cr. App.).
Chase, Dallas Consol. Electric St. R. Co. v.
(Tex.)

.1109

Chenault, Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. (Ky.)..1098 Chesapeake & O. R. Co. v. Austin (Ky.).. 144 Chesapeake & O. R. Co. v. Richards' Adm'r

.1092 274

(Ky.) ..1105 Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co., Matthews v. (Mo.)

1005 Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co., Ray v. (Mo. App.) 543 Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co., Seigfried v. (Mo. App.)

798

Chicago Mill & Lumber Co. v. Osceola
Land Co. (Ark.)
Chicago, R. I. & G. R. Co. v. Coffee (Tex.
Civ. App.).

380

638

602

169 284

118

120

127 93

Chicago, R. I. & G. R. Co. v. Crenshaw
(Tex. Civ. App.)..
Childress v. Southwest Missouri R. Co. (Mo.
App.)

...

Childs, Garth v. (Tex. Civ. App.).. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. R. Co. v. Sadieville Mill. Co. (Ky.).

Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. R. Co. v. Silvers (Ky.)

Citizens' Tel. Co. of Kentucky v. Wakefield (Ky.)

City of Bentonville, Browne v. (Ark.).
City of Glasgow v. Morrison-Fuller (Mo.
App.)

City of Houston v. Dupree (Tex.)..
City of Paris v. Brenneman (Tex. Civ.
App.)

236 .1115

58 989 495

City of St. Joseph, Sandy v. (Mo. App.)..
City of St. Louis v. King (Mo.)..
City of St. Louis v. St. Louis World Pub.
Co. (Mo.).

City of St. Louis v. Warren Commission &
Investment Co. (Mo.)

166

City of San Antonio v. Stevens (Tex. Civ.
App.)

666

Clark, Athens Cotton Oil Co. v. (Tex. Civ.
App.)

322

Clayton, State ex rel. Halsey v. (Mo.).... 506
Cobb & McCrory, Galveston, H. & S. A. R.
Co. v. (Tex. Civ. App.).

63

Coffee, Chicago, R. I. & G. R. Co. v. (Tex.
Civ. App.)..

638 253 729

619

916 .1070

.1019

Coffin v. German Fire Ins. Co. (Mo. App.)
Coffin, Maxey v. (Ark.)..
Coffman v. Texas Midland R. R. (Tex.
Civ. App.).

Cohen, Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co. v. (Tex. Civ.
App.)

Coleman v. Bercher (Ark.).

29

448

360

352

821

Continental Ins. Co. v. Johnson (Mo. App.) 966 Cooper, Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. (Ky.)..

Cooper, Maxey v. (Ark.).
Cooper v. State (Tex. Cr. App.).
Cooper, Sullivan-Sanford Lumber Co. v.
(Tex. Civ. App.).....

Cope, Moots v. (Mo. App.).

Corinth Woolen Mills v. Wabash R. Co. (Mo. App.)...

803

1030

Cornet v. Cabrillac (Mo.).
Cornish v. Friedman (Ark.).

.1079

Coryell, Gose v. (Tex. Civ. App.).

.1164

Cosby, Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. (Ky.) 142
Cotulla v. Urbahn (Tex. Civ. App.)..
Cotulla v. Urbahn (Tex.)..

13 ..1108 866

Couch v. State (Tex. Cr. App.).
Courtney v. National Annuity Ass'n (Mo.
App.)

..........

.....

111

842

862

771

Cox v. State (Tex. Cr. App.)..
Craig v. Wabash R. Co. (Mo. App.).
Craven v. State, two cases (Tex. Cr. App.) 574
981
Crawford, Miller v. (Mo. App.)..
Crenshaw, Chicago, R. I. & G. R. Co. v.
(Tex. Civ. App.).
Crockett v. St. Louis & H. R. Co. (Mo.
App.)

602

243 915

700

Crowson, Mounce v. (Tex. Civ. App.)....
Crystal City & U. R. Co. v. Boothe (Tex.
Čiv. App.).
Crystal City & U. R. Co. v. Isbell (Tex.
Čiv. App.)
Cumberland Pipe Line Co. v. Stambaugh
(Ky.)
Currie v. State (Ark.)..
Curry, Ray v. (Tex. Civ. App.).

47

...

106 842

26

....

35

184

...

987

886

Dallas Consol. Electric St. R. Co. v. Chase (Tex.) ....1109 384

Daniel, Allen v. (Ark.).

108

Daniel v. New Era Land Co. (Ky.).
Daniels v. State (Tex. Cr. App.).
Darden v. Taylor (Tex. Civ. App.)..
Darnell v. State (Tex. Cr. App.)...
Davis v. Nueces Valley Irr. Co. (Tex.).
Davis, Pemiscot Land & Cooperage Co.
(Mo. App.).....

.1153
944
.1122
4

v.

218

470

863

Davis, State v. (Mo.)..

Davis v. State (Tex. Cr. App.).
Deer Co., Melvin v. (Tex. Civ. App.).

681

De La Garza, Holbein v. (Tex. Civ. App.) 42
De Villeneuve, Walker v. (Tex. Civ. App.) 281
Diamond Distilleries Co. v. Gott (Ky.).... 131
Dibrell v. Fisher (Tex. Civ. App.)..... 905
Dickey, Galveston Electric Co. v. (Tex. Civ.
App.)

332

Dillard, Edwin Schiele & Co. v. (Ark.).. 835 Dines, Alt v. (Mo.).

.1035

Dixon, Bick v. (Mo. App.).
Dixon v. Melton (Ky.).
Dodd v. State (Ark.)...

Doke v. Trinity & B. V. R. Co. (Tex. Civ.
App.)

.1195

Doniphan Lumber Co. v. Wenzel (Ark.).. 710
Dorrance & Co. v. International & G. N.
R. Co. (Tex. Civ. App.).

694

Dorroh-Kelly Mercantile Co., Orient Ins.
Co. v. (Tex. Civ. App.)...

Doss, Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. (Ky.).
Douglas v. McClellan (Mo. App.).
Dowell v. Collin County Nat. Bank of Mc-
Kinney (Tex. Civ. App.).
Dowell v. State (Tex. Cr. App.).
Doyle v. State (Tex. Cr. App.).

358 834

616 349 994

29 871 .1131

[ocr errors][merged small]
« PreviousContinue »