...Its position is best expressed in a quotation from the opinion in Miller v. Eagle Lock Co., supra — "The result of the foregoing and other authorities'...the same patentee, although the terms of the claims muy differ ; that the second patent, although containing a broader claim, more geiierieal in its character,...

...was old. In the Miller Case, Mr. Justice Jackson, after canvassing a number of previous cases, said: "The result of the foregoing and other authorities...a former patent, especially to the same patentee, though the terms of the claims may differ." And in the Palmer Pneumatic Tire Co. Case, this court,...

...In Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Company, 151 US 186, 14 Sup. Ct. 310, 38 L. Ed. 121, it is decided that: "No patent can issue for an invention actually...patentee, although the terms of the claims may differ. The second patent, in such case, although containing a claim broader and more generlcal in its character...

...by adopting the language of the court in Miller v. Manufacturing Co., 151 US 198, 14 Sup. Ct. 310: "The result of the foregoing and other authorities...issue for an invention actually covered by a former pateut, especially to the same patentee, although the terms of the claims may differ; that the second...

...THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA. No. 143. Argued December 11, 12, 1893. — Decided January 8, 1894. No patent can Issue for an Invention actually covered...patentee, although the terms of the claims may differ. The second patent, in such case, although containing a claim broader and more generical in its character...

...In Ex parte Holt (1884), 29 0. G. 171, are discussed three classes of cases : — 1. Those holding that no patent can issue for an invention actually covered by a former patent though the terms of their Claims may differ, viz., Sickels r. Falls Co., 4 Blatch. 508 ; O'Reilly v....

...Miller v. Manufacturing Co., (ante, 147; CO O. C*., 845; 151 US, 186, ) in which that Court says: Tbe result of the foregoing and other authorities is,...issue for an invention actually covered by a former pateut, especially to the same pateuteo, although the terms of the claims may differ. The second claim:...

...Eagle Manf. Co., (CD, 1894, 147; 66 OG, 845; 151 US, 186, 198,) where he says that the result of the authorities is — that no patent can issue for an...differ; that the second patent, although containing ;i broader claim, more generical in its character, than the specific claims contained in the prior...

...relate to the prior art. In Miller v. Manufacturing Co., 151 US 186, 14 Sup. Ct. 310, where it is held that no patent can issue for an invention actually...patentee, although the terms of the claims may differ, Mr. Justice Jackson, after reviewing the authorities, says: "The result of the foregoing aud other...

...adheres to the old rule, which is well stated in the syllabus, as follows : No patent can issue for au invention actually covered by a former patent, especially...same patentee, although the terms of the claims may dilt'er. The seconil i>atrnt, ill such case, although containing a claim broader anil nturn geuerical...