The Pacific Reporter, Volume 230West Publishing Company, 1925 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 2
poratior sole , nereinafter referred to as peti- , visions of the Workmen's
Compensation , Intioner . The award was in the amount of surance , and Safety
Act of 1917. ” $ 583.24 , and the additional sum of $ 20.83 Including the amount
of the ...
poratior sole , nereinafter referred to as peti- , visions of the Workmen's
Compensation , Intioner . The award was in the amount of surance , and Safety
Act of 1917. ” $ 583.24 , and the additional sum of $ 20.83 Including the amount
of the ...
Page 14
The two instructions court that , while it is not prejudicial error referred to , asked
by the defendants , and re- to give such an instruction , such an instrucfused to be
given by the trial court , are as tion ought not to be given , because of its follows ...
The two instructions court that , while it is not prejudicial error referred to , asked
by the defendants , and re- to give such an instruction , such an instrucfused to be
given by the trial court , are as tion ought not to be given , because of its follows ...
Page 20
But , if so , that will be a question that the judgment and order herein referred
between the plaintiffs and the employer . In to should be reversed . It is that the
trial order to make sure that the right of action court erred in failing to instruct the
jury ...
But , if so , that will be a question that the judgment and order herein referred
between the plaintiffs and the employer . In to should be reversed . It is that the
trial order to make sure that the right of action court erred in failing to instruct the
jury ...
Page 23
... attorney charging tion , not having been taken within the statthree separate
offenses in three separate utory time , the motion to dismiss should be counts .
Upon being arraigned on the in- granted , and it is so ordered . formation just
referred ...
... attorney charging tion , not having been taken within the statthree separate
offenses in three separate utory time , the motion to dismiss should be counts .
Upon being arraigned on the in- granted , and it is so ordered . formation just
referred ...
Page 51
9 negatives defendant's con- to disclose that such a contract was referred tention
that this option was given to plain- | to at any place . Counsel for respondent tiff
and defendant in connection with the bas not directed attention to any evidence ...
9 negatives defendant's con- to disclose that such a contract was referred tention
that this option was given to plain- | to at any place . Counsel for respondent tiff
and defendant in connection with the bas not directed attention to any evidence ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirmed agreed alleged amount appeal application assigned authority bank bond cause charge claim Code Company condition constitute contention contract conviction Criminal damages decree deed defendant delivered denied determined Digests and Indexes direct district District Court effect entered entitled error escrow evidence executed fact fendant filed findings follows further give given granted ground guilty held instruction interest issue Judge judgment jury Key-Numbered Digests land lease matter ment mortgage motion necessary objection paid parties payment person plaintiff possession present proceedings purchase question reason received record referred refused rendered respondent reversed rule secure statute sufficient Supreme Court sustained taken testimony thereof tion topic and KEY-NUMBER trial court verdict Wash wife witness
Popular passages
Page 44 - But where the instrument is in the hands of a holder in due course, a valid delivery thereof by all parties prior to him so as to make them liable to him is conclusively presumed.
Page 175 - No special privileges or immunities shall ever be granted which may not be altered, revoked or repealed by the Legislature; nor shall any citizen, or class of citizens, be granted privileges or immunities which, upon the same terms, shall not be granted to all citizens.
Page 31 - Where a negotiable instrument is materially altered without the assent of all parties liable thereon, it is avoided, except as against a party who has himself made, authorized or assented to the alteration, and subsequent indorsers.
Page 32 - That it is complete and regular upon its face; 2. That he became the holder of it before it was overdue, and without notice that it had been previously dishonored, if such was the fact; 3. That he took it in good faith and for value; 4. That at the time it was negotiated to him he had no notice of any infirmity in the instrument or defect in the title of the person negotiating it.
Page 370 - All murder which is perpetrated by means of poison, or lying in wait, torture, or by any other kind of willful, deliberate, and premeditated killing, or which is committed in the perpetration or attempt to perpetrate arson, rape, robbery, burglary, or mayhem, is murder of the first degree; and all other kinds of murders are of the second degree.
Page 194 - In all other cases, the defendant may be found guilty of any offense the commission of which is necessarily included in that with which he is charged in the indictment
Page 356 - ... it depends in each case on the terms of the contract and the circumstances of the case, whether the breach of contract is so material as to justify the injured party in refusing to proceed further...
Page 263 - That carriers while under Federal control shall be subject to all laws and liabilities as common carriers, whether arising under State or Federal laws or at common law, except in so far as may be inconsistent with the provisions of this Act or any other Act applicable to such Federal control or with any order of the President.
Page 71 - Every person negotiating an instrument by delivery or by a qualified indorsement, warrants : 1. That the instrument is genuine and in all respects what it purports to be; 2.
Page 205 - ... it seems but reasonable and just that the neighbour who has brought something on his own property which was not naturally there, harmless to others so long as it is confined to his own property...