Hyper/text/theoryIn his widely acclaimed book Hypertext George P. Landow described a radically new information technology and its relationship to the work of such literary theorists as Jacques Derrida and Roland Barthes. Now Landow has brought together a distinguished group of authorities to explore more fully the implications of hypertextual reading for contemporary literary theory. Among the contributors, Charles Ess uses the work of Jurgen Habermas and the Frankfurt School to examine hypertext's potential for true democratization. Stuart Moulthrop turns to Deleuze and Guattari as a point of departure for a study of the relation of hypertext and political power. Espen Aarseth places hypertext within a framework created by other forms of electronic textuality. David Kolb explores what hypertext implies for philosophy and philosophical discourse. Jane Yellowlees Douglas, Gunnar Liestol, and Mireille Rosello use contemporary theory to come to terms with hypertext narrative. Terrence Harpold investigates the hypertextual fiction of Michael Joyce. Drawing on Derrida, Lacan, and Wittgenstein, Gregory Ulmer offers an example of the new form of writing hypertextuality demands. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 4
Page
Terence His endless rituals are delaying tactics, locking in the contingent mo
Harpold ment prior to closure. The bind in which the obsessional finds himself is
this: he seems to have every reason to believe that closure in the field of the
Other is ...
Terence His endless rituals are delaying tactics, locking in the contingent mo
Harpold ment prior to closure. The bind in which the obsessional finds himself is
this: he seems to have every reason to believe that closure in the field of the
Other is ...
Page
Since the hyperdocu- ment would always be in flux, it could not be constituted as
a series of discursive stabilities but would in actual fact represent a smooth.
Since the hyperdocu- ment would always be in flux, it could not be constituted as
a series of discursive stabilities but would in actual fact represent a smooth.
Page
ment that demand and produce a line. What would thinking mean if it were not
providing form and focus, definite claims, critical judgment, beginnings, middles,
and ends, and so preventing an indefinite accumulation of words and images?
ment that demand and produce a line. What would thinking mean if it were not
providing form and focus, definite claims, critical judgment, beginnings, middles,
and ends, and so preventing an indefinite accumulation of words and images?
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
jl | |
NONLINEARITY | |
Wittgenstein Cenette and the Readers Narrative | |
Copyright | |
9 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Afternoon argument become Cambridge Carmen Miranda claim closure communication concept context contingent created Critical Theory critique cultural cybertext David Kolb democratic polity discourse discourse ethic discussion Eastgate Systems electronic environment essay ethic example experience Frankfurt School genre geometry George Habermas Habermas's Harpold hyper HyperCard hypermedia Hypermedia and Literary hypertext fiction hypertext systems hypertext theory ideological interactive Joyce Landow language lexias linear literary theory literature logical means ment metaphor Michael Joyce Miranda Moulthrop narrative nodes nonlinear nonlinear text Norman Meyrowitz norms Peter philosophy physical political possible Postmodern problem reader reading relation rhetoric RHIZOME samba screen screeners scriptons sense sequence signifier social sophism spatial story Storyspace structure Stuart Moulthrop textons textual theoretical theorists tion tive trans tropes Ulmer University Press What's a Critic Wittgenstein word Writing Space Yellowlees Douglas York