Page images
PDF
EPUB

THE

- 38

N. Y. WEEKLY DIGEST

OF CASES DECIDED

IN THE

U. S. Supreme, Circuit, and District Courts, Appellate
Courts of the several States, State and City.

Courts of New York and English Courts.

VOL. I.

NEW YORK:
McDIVITT, CAMPBELL & CO., .

LAW BOOKSELLERS AND PUBLISHERS,
79 NASSAU STREET.

KF

105.1
1876.

.N9

vil

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

TABLE OF CASES DIGESTED.

et al...

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

319

upway. IIDICOCK...........

.. 340

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED

PAGE. The National Bank of Commerce of Boston STATES.

PAGEL v. The Merchants' National Bank of MemIn Da

Claul, et Bailey, Collector of Int. Rev., v. Clark et

phis......................... .........297 al...........

43 | The Philadelphia and Southern Mail v, .

Steamship Co., claimant, etc. The Bailey v. Work et al. .................... 43

United States .............. .......... 326 Bailey.et al. v. The Pacific R. R., Magwire

The United States v. The Philadelphia and

......... Southern Mail Steamship Co, claimant, Brown et al. v. Piper.......... ... 310 etc..

etc........

......... .......... 326 Chaffraix v. Shiff. .................... 569 The Wilmington and Weldon R. R. Co. V. Dainese v. The Board of Public Works of the District of Columbia..

523 / United States v. Norton......
Upton v. Trebicock,

.......... Danier v. Hale.......................... 301

Watts v. The Territory of Washington.... 573 Dillion, applt. v. Barnard et al. Assignees and Hart et al. Trustees...

U. S. CIRCUIT COURTS.
Dows et al. v. The National Exchange Bank
of Milwaukee ....

N. D. Georgia.
French, ex parte ........................ 397
Hotchkiss v. The National Shoe and Leather

Brown v. The United States ex rel. Bridges 347
Bank and The Tradesmen's National
Bank...

N. D. of Illinois. ............... 17 Jackson v. Jackson.........

... 472 City of Chicago v. Gage et al............. 331 Knotts et al. v. Stearns, extr, et al. .... Long et al. v. Converse et al.............. 504

D. of Iowa. McComb, Surviving Executor v. The Coun

Brooks v. Mills County.................. 387 ty Commissioners of Knox County, O.. 267 McLemore v. The Louisiana State Bank... 268

Pittsburgh Locomotive and Car Works v; Matthews v. McStea..................... 285

State National Bank of Keokuk........ 332 Roemer et al v. Simon.........

411

D. of Kansas. Sawyer et al v. Turpin et al. ... .......... Scudder v. The Union National Bank of The First National Bank of Manhattan v.

Chicago............................... 488 The Citizens' Bank of Topeka.......... 511 Semmes, claimant, v. The United States.. 274 The United States v. Kansas Pacific R’way Slack, Collector of Int. Rev., v. Tucker et

Co.........

.................. 444 al.........

............. 44 Terrell et al v. Allison................... 19

D. of Lousiana. The Baltimore and Potomac R. R. Co. v.

Hewett, extr., v. Norton, assignee........ The Trustees of the Sixth Presbyterian Church............................... 518

Massachusetts. The Farmers and Mechanics' National Bank of Buffalo v. Dearing.................. 289 on

United States v. Black et al....... The First National Bank of Selma, Ala., v.

S. D. of Mississippi. Colby.........

.......... 35 The Mechanics and Traders' Bank v. The Austin v. O'Reilly, Assignee....

Union Bank of Louisiana .... ......... The Mutual Life Insurance Co. of N. Y.

E. D. Missouri. v. Young, Ad'tr......

20 Farrar v. Walker, Assignee, and Reister.. 229

[ocr errors]

................

[ocr errors]

..... 36

22

PAGE.

PAGE.

179

n...............

W. D. Missouri.

Indiana. Orner v. Saunders...

.......... 383) Dunkerson, Robert K. & Co., in re....... The United States ex rel McKee v. The Lamb, assignee, v. Brown... County Court of Vernon County........ 378 Lamb, assignee, v. Lamb...

Owens John, in re............
D. Nebraska.

Valentine William H. in rc....
Oliver v. The City of Omaha............. 385 | Witt, assignee, v. Hereth................

..........

78 Read J. K. P., in re..

... 100

... 517

D. of Nevada.

Kansas. Kieley v. The Belcher Silver Mining Co... 349 Augustine, assignec v. McFarland et. al.. 318 Knaresborough v. The Belcher Silver Mining Co................................ 355

Massachusetts. . E. D. of New York.

Lane, Brett & Co., in re Dreyfus, ex parte. 296
Langdon in re.........

......... 365 Collins Charles, in re.......

S. D. of New York.
Barnes, Assignce, v. The United States.... 177

E. D. Michigan.
Merrill et al., in re....................... 364 Bergeron, John B., in re........

Geis Frederick, in re....
W. D. North Carolina.

Sabin Philo R., in re...
Bank of North Carolina...... .......... 126

N. D. Mississippi.
S. D. of Ohio.

Boothe, assignee, v. Brooks, Meely & Co.. 125 Andrews extrs. v. Garrett....

452

W. D. Missouri.
Dist. of Oregon.
Moreland v. Marion County...........

United States v. Adler et al ...
326

United States v. Blackburn et al. ......... D. of Oregon.

Wald & Aehle, in re..................
The Eliza Ladd.....

New Jersey.
E. D. of Pennsylvania.

Bowne and Ten Eyck, in re....
Consolidated Fruit Jar Co. v. Dorflinger
al..........

N. D. of New York. Guillou, Assignee v. Fontain..........

269 Foot, Norman B., et al. in re............. Micheneor v. Payson, Assignee...... Potter et al. v. Wright.........

S. D. of New York.
W. D. of Penn.

Hamburger and Frankel..
The Schuylkill Navigation Co. v. Elliott.. 282

Hinsdale and Doughty.....

Wood in re...
W. D. of Texas.

E. D. of New York.
Jackson, assignee, v. McCullough et al. ... 537

Central Bank of Brooklyn, in re.......... E. D. Wisconsin.

Marvin, assignee v. Chambers.... Warner v. Cronkhite..

E. D. of New York.

Woodward in re ........ ................
U. S. DISTRICT COURTS.

N. D. Ohio.
California.

Sargent, in re.........
Bradbury, assignee, v. Galloway.......... 34 Tonne, in re......
N. D. of Illinois.

Oregon.
Daniels, a bankrupt, in re.... ...... 271 Milwain, in re.........

...... 76

..... 245

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

............ 291

........ 437

PAGE,

128

as.

W. D. of Pennsylvania.

Indiana.

PAGE. Blake v. McClelland.

174

Supreme Court of Indiana.
E. D. Texas.

Blair v. Hamilton .........

Brown v. The State.. Bledsoe, in re........

...... 101

Haggerty v. Johnson.....

Kelsey v. Henry.........
W. D. Texas.

Marmont v. The State ..
Holland Geo. B., Jr., in re.... ......... 126 | Nealis et al. v. Hayward.

E. D. of Virginia. Eldridge M. & Co., in re.

... 243

Iowa.

E. D. Wisconsin.

Supreme Court of Iowa. Noesen Theodore, in re......

125 Daniels v. Chicago, Iowa and Nebraska R. United States v. Southmayd.............. 155

R. Co.....

.......... 287 Ohde, Admr., v. Northwestern Mutual Life

Insurance Co............... .......... 158 W. D. Wisconsin. United States v. Rinksdopf et al. ... ....

Kansas.

223

STATE COURTS.

Supreme Court of Kansas.
Smith et al. v. Smith et al. ............... 384

California.

Supreme Court of California.

Kentucky.
Schwalm v. Holmes...................... 223

Kentucky Court of Appeals.
District of Columbia.

Fogle's Extr. v. Fogle....

....... 141

Horsford, admtrx. v. Payne, et al.........422 Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. The City of Henderson v. Sandefor, et al.. 380

Ullman et al v. Abrams.......

136 Chandler v. Cook, Trustee.... .......... 166 Neidringaus, in the matter of the applica

Wheatly v. Mercer et al. ................. 123 tion for a patent, of....... .......... 353

Maine.
Illinois.

Maine Supreme Court.
Supreme Court of Illinois.

Bishop v. Small, Jr....
Rees et al. v. Peltzer et al. .............. 129 Dunn v. Record....................
Sheridan et al., Police Comm’rs of Chicago, Emery v. Hobson....... ........

v. Colvin, Mayor, and the City Council of Same v. Same.......... .......... ..
Chicago......

.......... 234 McGlinchy v. Winchell and Truste. ..... Sims v. Bice...

... 324 Sawyer v. Garcelon... The Peoria, Pekin and Jacksonville R. R. Shurtleff v. Thompson.......

Co. v. Camp.......................... 164 The Quincy, Alton and St. Louis R. R. Co. v. Wellhoener.....

...... 164

Maryland. The State ex rel, etc., v. The City of Chicago.......

.......... 298

Maryland Court of Appeals.
Circuit Court of Cook County.

Lavender v. Gosnell and Triplett........ 54

The Knickerbocker Life Insurance Co. v. Woods v. Sands .. ......... 333 Peters..

............... 134

« PreviousContinue »