Rule as to payment by maker of note which he had been notified was lost. Indorsement of such note. No. 713, p. 37. Where a raised check bore a certain spe- cial indorsement of the holder, held, that the holder was not liable to re- fund the money to the drawee bank. 1a, No. 700, p. 1.
Where certain persons signed the follow- ing writing on the back of a note, "For value received we hereby guar- anty the payment of the within note and waive demand and notice of pro- test on same when due," held, that such persons, as guarantors, were en- titled to reasonable notice that the note had not been paid. 91a.
A note negotiable in form, held to be made a non-negotiable instrument by
reason of certain clauses in mortgage given to secure it. No. 710, p. 49. Undated indorsements or other writings on a note are presumed to have been made on the date of the execution of the note. No. 740, p. 189.
An assignment on a separate paper, held not equivalent to indorsement, so as to cut off defenses of maker. 176a. Agent who had actual authority to in- dorse checks for deposit held to have bound his principal by indorsing a check which was diverted through third party. 191a.
Waiver of protest placed over indorsed name held to have released him. 147a.
Certain alleged agreements between makers or indorsers of notes held not to bind the holder of the notes. 143a. Rule as to indorsement of check payable to two persons who are not partners.
Indorser of check, on receiving payment thereon, held, on appeal, to have war- ranted the genuineness of a previous forged indorsement regardless of the negligence of the drawer of the check in issuing it. 101a.
Indorser held not to have waived pro- test by procuring extension of note for maker. Certain makers held to have changed their position to that of surety and to have been released by extensions of time of payment. 184a. Under the laws of New Jersey a wife is not liable on a note as surety for her husband: Held, by a divided court, that where a married woman in that State indorsed a note in blank to be used by her husband for a certain pur- pose, and the husband had the note filled out and discounted for another purpose in the State of New York, the wife is liable. 35a.
Where certain indorsed time certifi- cates of deposit were turned in on purchase of farm, held, not to have been acepted as so much payment of purchase price. 87a. Certain provision in note held to make it non-negotiable. Indorser of non- negotiable note, who was the payee, held as maker. 13a.
Authority of agent, who has power to indorse for deposits, to indorse and draw money. 64a.
Where the wife of the maker of a note
executed to a trustee a deed to secure a surety on the note, held, that the surety and her property were released where the note was renewed without her consent. 89a.
Where the president of a corporation who has power to indorse and dis-
count its bills receivable- and did it frequently with banks - indorsed and discounted such bills to himself on fair terms and in good faith: Held, on appeal, that the corporation was not liable on its indorsement. 2013, No.
An ordinary promissory note reading "with interest at six per cent. and taxes," was held non-negotiable by reason of the provision for payment of taxes, and one who wrote his name on the back thereof was not liable as indorser. 197a.
An indorsement of a note, which is used as margins in grain gambling trans- actions, being void, even in bona fide holder's hands, in Illinois: Held, that such a renewal indorsement made in Nebraska will, under certain circum- stances, be governed by the law of Illinois. 322a.
Where the maker of a check, which he
drew in payment of a team of horses, made it payable to the owner of the horses who passed under the assumed name of J. L. Baldwin, his indorse- ment of the check under that name was a good indorsement. 241a. Rule as to liability of accommodation indorser before inception who indorses in one State a note payable in another. Different rule as to indorsers for value after inception. 207a.
Writing of firm name on back of re- newed note, held to make the firm joint makers, not indorsers. Renewal
of certain note held to constitute pay- ment of old note. 239a.
Bank said not to be liable on its guar- anty by its cashier of his note and the notes of a company of which he was treasurer, rediscounted at another bank, and which were renewed. 346a. Bank held not to be bona fide holder of note the proceeds of which it had placed to customer's credit, the credit not having been withdrawn un- til after the bank had notice of de- fenses of the maker to the note. 335a, No. 757, p. 261.
C. deposited money in a bank to be paid to James Malloy, whom the bank knew resided at Corrine. The bank notified James Malloy of the credit, but by mistake sent the letter of noti- fication to Denver, where it was re- ceived by another James Malloy, who notified the bank to send him a draft, which the bank did, and the wrong James Malloy indorsed the draft to an innocent purchaser: Held, that such purchaser got good title to the Idraft and the bank was liable. 340a. One who wrote his name on the back
of a note, held, under the circum- stances, to be a guarantor, not an in- dorser, and not entitled to notice of nonpayment: Different rule in some States. 354a.
A note payable to "John Jones, Attor- ney," is a non-negotiable instrument, and carries on its face notice that other parties are interested in its ownership. 360a.
Where an indorser has been released from his liability as such by failure to demand payment of the maker, he will again become liable if, with full knowledge of the facts, he promises to pay the note. No. 753, p. 247. Where a bank had discounted for the payee before maturity a note which the payee had procured on lack of proper consideration, and to which the maker would have a good defense against the payee, held, that if the payee had had on deposit with the bank, since the maturity of the note, sufficient funds to pay the note, and the bank knew of all the facts, it could not collect the note of the maker. 382a.
Where a lease provided that the tenant could remove his trade fixtures dur- ing his tenancy, and they were not so removed during the life of the first lease, and second lease did not pro- vide for their removal, held, that the right to remove them was lost to the tenant. No. 752, p. 246.
Where the owner of land enters into a contract with a builder to erect a building thereon, and through the neg- ligence of the builder a passerby is injured, the owner is not liable for damages. No. 764, p. 389. Tenant on a farm, under lease which provides that the tenant shall not sublet, has right to let hired man оссиру a house on the farm. Rule
as to what is "good repair." No. 731, p. 130.
Rule as to duty of landlords under usual clause in lease who takes pos- session of leased premises by reason of failure of tenant before expiration of lease. No. 719, p. 75. Tenant's rights, under old lease, to re- move fixtures, held to have been lost by terms of new lease. 132a.
A landlord is not liable to his tenant for injury from a collapse of the building owing to defects existing at the time of the rental, where the landlord did not have actual notice of such defects. 278a.
A landlord who has covenanted in the lease to supply the dwelling with water, held not to be liable to the tenant for damages by reason of leaky water pipes.
A promise, made after the inception of the lease, to put in proper pipes, held to be without consideration. 304a. Liability of landlord who leased prem- ises to be occupied for a certain pur- pose to one who purchased fixtures and furniture on the strength of the lease, but who, without fault on his part, was kept out of possession of the premises. 264a.
Rule as to liability of landlord or tenant, or of the guarantor of tenant's lease, or of the city, where one is damaged by falling through cellar doors in the sidewalk.
Where a lease provided that the tenant could remove his trade fixtures dur- ing his tenancy, and they were not so removed during the life of the first lease, and second lease did not pro- vide for their removal, held, that the right to remove them was lost to the tenant. No. 752, p. 246.
A promise, made after the inception of
LEASE Continued:
the lease, to put in proper pipes, held to be without consideration. 304a. Where, after the surety had guaranteed the payments to be made on a ten- year lease, its terms were, without his knowledge, altered so that if the build- ings were destroyed by fire the lease was to terminate; held, that the surety was released. 244a. Certain building erected by tenant, under permission by the landlord, held to be a fixture which the tenant could not remove. 56a. Liability of landlord who leased prem- ises to be occupied for a certain pur- pose to one who purchased fixtures and furniture on the strength of the lease, but who, without fault on his part, was kept out of possession of the premises. 264a.
A landlord who had covenanted in the lease to supply the dwelling with water, held not to be liable to the tenant for damages by reason of leaky water pipes.
Tenant on a farm, under lease which provides that the tenant shall not sublet, has right to let hired man occupy a house on the farm. Rule as to what is "good repair." No. 731,
Tenant's rights, under old lease, to re- move fixtures, held to have been lost by terms of new lease. 132a.
LETTER OF CREDIT:
Where a bank issued a certain described letter of credit, and the person to whom it was issued drew checks to persons who were ignorant of the ex- istence of the letter, which were paid by the issuing bank - it being igno- rant of the letter not having been exhibited and the holder of the letter then exhibited the letter to another bank, which cashed checks on the faith of it, held, that the issuing bank must pay such checks. 351a, No. 758, p. 267.
Rule as to liability of accommodation indorser before inception who indorses in one State a note payable in another. Different rule as to indorsers for value after inception. 207a.
Certain deposit in bank to credit of third person, held subject to the banker's lien and applicable on debt of such third person to the bank.
Certain payment of interest by an exe- cutor held not to entitle the State claim to enforcement against the es- tate. 63а. Nonresidence of debtor held not to stop the running of the statute. 145a. The statute held to run against the mortgage given to secure a debt, al- though the debt was kept in life by renewals. 145a.
Certain note held to be so worded as to make it doubtful as to the rate of in- terest it would bear after maturity, and hence was non-negotiable and not entitled to grace, and thus barred by the statute of limitations. 250a.
Rule as to payment by maker of note which he had been notified was lost. Indorsement of such note. No. 713, P. 57.
MASSACHUSETTS:
One who wrote his name on the back of a note, held, under the circumstances, to be a guarantor, not an indorser, and not entitled to notice of nonpay- ment: Different rule in some States. 354a.
MASTER AND SERVANT:
Rule as to right of certain employees to devote part of their time to other duties. No. 56, p. 722.
Rule as to right of employer as to dam- ages where the relation is severed be- fore the end of the term. No. 724, p. 96. Rule as to damages where a servant is discharged before expiration of his term. 58a.
Where the owner of a building con- tracted with another to remove a building in a lawful manner the owner is not liable to one injured thereby. 231a.
Right of employer or principal to dis-
charge broker or employee before end of term of agency or employment. 404a.
Rule as to damages to an employee who
has been wrongfully discharged be- fore his term of employment had ex- pired. 362a.
Where a mortgagor agrees to insure property for the benefit of the owner of the mortgage, but fails to do so, taking the insurance for his own bene- fit, held, that the insurance company which has notice of the facts, must
respect the equities of the mortgagor. Different rule in some States. 234a. Certain clauses in a mortgage securing a negotiable note held to make the note a non-negotiable instrument. 15a, No. 702, p. 18.
Where a non-negotiable mortgage was made to secure a negotiable note, and the two were negotiated together, held, that the note was non-negotiable, and that bona fide payment by the maker to the payee after he has sold the securities would be good as against the true owner. No. 730,
P. 128. Rule as to payment of mortgage by grantee of deed who accepts deed with such provision inserted in it.
Where the maker of a check, which he drew in payment of a team of horses, made it payable to the owner of the horses who passed under the assumed name of J. L. Baldwin, his indorse- ment of the check under that name was a good indorsement. 241a. NATIONAL BANK:
Where a borrower of a national bank executed a mortgage to its president, individually, to secure the debt of the bank, held, that the usury laws ap- plicable to national banks, instead of the laws of the State, would govern the amount due when the bank sought to have the mortgage foreclosed for its benefit. No. 744, p. 209.
A bank cannot be a member of partner- ship (and this is true, generally, of any corporation). Liability of bank that becomes part owner in a partner- ship. No. 727, p. 115.
Held to have power to hire building for a term far beyond the expiration of its charter. No. 719, p. 75.
Where the owner of land enters into a contract with a builder to erect a building thereon, and through the negligence of the builder a passerby is injured, the owner is not liable for damages. No. 764, p. 389.
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW: In many States a pre-existing debt is a sufficient consideration to constitute one a holder in due course of a nego- tiable note. The negotiable instru- ments law seems to so declare; but the lower courts of New York hold that such declaration does not change the
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW
rule previously existing in New York, i. e., that such consideration does not constitute one a holder in due course. 273a.
Under the laws of New Jersey a wife is not liable on a note as surety for her husband: Held, that where a mar- ried woman in that State indorsed a note in blank to be used by her hus- band for a certain purpose, and the husband had the note filled out and discounted for another purpose in the State of New York, the wife is liable. 35a.
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT:
Note under seal said to be a non-nego- tiable instrument. 403a.
NON-NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT: A note payable to "John Jones, Attor- ney," is a non-negotiable instrument, and carries on its face notice that other parties are interested in its ownership. 360a.
Payment to payees of non-negotiable note, after they had transferred it, held good: Note held to be non-nego- tiable by reason of certain provisions for extension of time. 336a, No. 759, p. 370.
An ordinary promissory note reading "with interest at 6 per cent. and taxes," was held non-negotiable by reason of the provision for the pay- ment of taxes, and one who wrote his name on the back thereof was not lia- ble as indorser. 197a.
Note negotiable in form except for these words with interest at the rate of 12 per cent. from date if not paid at ma- turity," held to be non-negotiable. 203, No. 736, p. 169.
Certain note held to be so worded as to make it doubtful as to the rate of in- terest it would bear after maturity, and hence was non-negotiable and not entitled to grace, and thus barred by the statute of limitations. 250a. Where a non-negotiable mortgage was made to secure a negotiable note, and the two were negotiated together, held, that the note was non-negotiable, and that bona fide payment by the maker to the payee after he has sold the securities would be good as against the true owner. No. 730,
Certain provision for extension of time of payment of note, held to make it non-negotiable, and payment to orig-
A note negotiable in form, held to be made a non-negotiable instrument by reason of certain clauses in mortgage given to secure it. No. 710, p. 49. Reference to a mortgage, given to secure an otherwise negotiable instrument, held to be notice to purchaser of any statements in the mortgage prejudicial to the negotiability of instrument. 19a, No. 706, p. 33.
Where certain persons signed the follow- ing writing on the back of a note,
For value received we hereby guar- anty the payment of the within note and waive demand and notice of pro- test on same when due," held, that such persons, as guarantors, were en- titled to reasonable notice that the note had not been paid. 91a. Reference to a mortgage, given to secure an otherwise negotiable instrument, held to be notice to purchaser of any statements in the mortgage prejudicial to the negotiability of instrument. 19a, No. 706, p. 33.
Rule as to payment by maker of note which he had been notified was lost. Indorsement of such note. No. 173,
Where a bank cashier drew checks of his bank, signed by himself as cash- ier, and sent them to a brokerage firm through whom he was speculating, held, that the brokers were liable to the bank for funds lost to the bank, the cashier not having accounted to the bank for the amount of such checks. 336a.
Bank said not to be liable on its guar- anty by its cashier of his note and the notes of a company of which he was treasurer, rediscounted at another bank, and which were re- newed. 346a.
While one is bound to deny many state- ments made in his presence, as to his liability in certain cases, where silence would be construed as assent, he is not bound to the same extent to deny such statements made to him by let- ter. No. 753, p. 247.
Where one doing business under a trade name sells the business to another,
« PreviousContinue » |