Reports of Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of the Territory of Utah, Volume 32 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 54
Page 13
... offered by the appellant in the trial court , because appellant has not ex- cepted to the ruling of the trial court to the effect that the evidence was insufficient to establish the contract . ( Evans McCASHLAND V. KEOGH . 13.
... offered by the appellant in the trial court , because appellant has not ex- cepted to the ruling of the trial court to the effect that the evidence was insufficient to establish the contract . ( Evans McCASHLAND V. KEOGH . 13.
Page 28
... offer to pay only what he thinks the goods are worth to him , regard- less of any price placed on them by the dealer . The wit- ness , however , gave a description of the articles , when bought , how and where , and how long used . This ...
... offer to pay only what he thinks the goods are worth to him , regard- less of any price placed on them by the dealer . The wit- ness , however , gave a description of the articles , when bought , how and where , and how long used . This ...
Page 29
... offered to sell them , she might not have realized the amount the jury allowed her . She , however , had them , not for disposal in that way , but for daily use in her home , and we think she was entitled to recover the actual value in ...
... offered to sell them , she might not have realized the amount the jury allowed her . She , however , had them , not for disposal in that way , but for daily use in her home , and we think she was entitled to recover the actual value in ...
Page 79
... offered anything in sup- port of the validity of the statute . It seeks to uphold the ruling of the court upon the ground that the answer does not contain sufficient allegations that the defendant was the head of a family , that the ...
... offered anything in sup- port of the validity of the statute . It seeks to uphold the ruling of the court upon the ground that the answer does not contain sufficient allegations that the defendant was the head of a family , that the ...
Page 107
... offering a premium to with- hold pay in such cases . Is there any reason why a person sustaining injury and damage to his property from the neg- ligent act of another should not receive just what he has lost as nearly as this may be ...
... offering a premium to with- hold pay in such cases . Is there any reason why a person sustaining injury and damage to his property from the neg- ligent act of another should not receive just what he has lost as nearly as this may be ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
agreement alleged amend amount APPEAL from District appellant appellant's articles of incorporation assessment attorney authority bill of exceptions cause of action cited claim complaint Constitution contract contributory negligence corporation counsel damages deceased deed default defendant defendant's demurrer district court duty engine entered entitled error evidence exemption fact fendant filed findings FRICK full-paid capital stock Garfield county grade granted held homestead injury instruction intestate judge judgment jurisdiction jury justice lease Legislature levy liable liens material issues MCCARTY ment mileage motion negligence notice party person plaintiff pleadings purpose question Railroad reason reserved power respect respondent respondent's Revised Statutes 1898 rule Salt Lake City Salt Lake county servant stockholders STRAUP sufficient sustained switch term testified thereof tion track train treasury stock trial court Utah vacate judgment verdict witness
Popular passages
Page 186 - Every such action shall be brought by and in the name of the personal representative of such deceased person...
Page 429 - States provides that full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the judicial proceedings of every other state.
Page 472 - Administration may be granted to one or more competent persons, although not otherwise entitled to the same, at the written request of the person entitled, filed in the court.
Page 341 - The question always is: Was there an unbroken connection between the wrongful act and the injury, a continuous operation? Did the facts constitute a continuous succession of events, so linked together as to make a natural whole, or was there sottfe new and Independent cause intervening between the wrong and the injury?
Page 68 - ... the plaintiff must recover upon the strength of his own title, and not upon the weakness of that of the defendant...
Page 188 - And where the testimony leaves the matter uncertain and shows that any one of half a dozen things may have brought about the injury, for some of which the employer is responsible and for some of which he is not, it is not for the jury to guess between these half a dozen causes and find that the negligence of the employer was the real cause, when there is no satisfactory foundation in the testimony for that conclusion.
Page 368 - ... then also against such other person. In every action under this and the preceding section such damages may be given as under all the circumstances of the case may be just.
Page 407 - ... to its own use to the damage of the plaintiff in the sum of $100,000 and interest at 6 per cent, from the date of the demand and refusal.
Page 206 - The true rule is that what is the proximate cause of an Injury is ordinarily a question for the jury. It is not a question of science or legal knowledge. It is to be determined as a fact, in view of the circumstances of fact attending It.
Page 66 - In ejectment, the plaintiff must recover, if at all, upon the strength of his own title and not upon the weakness of the title of the defendant.