Reports of Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of the Territory of Utah, Volume 32 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page xviii
... ex rel . Porter v . Ritchie , Judge 381 Writ of mandate - time to appeal from justice's court . State v . James 152 Prosecution for incest . Stone v . U. P. Railroad Co. ( second case xviii [ 32 Utah CASES REPORTED .
... ex rel . Porter v . Ritchie , Judge 381 Writ of mandate - time to appeal from justice's court . State v . James 152 Prosecution for incest . Stone v . U. P. Railroad Co. ( second case xviii [ 32 Utah CASES REPORTED .
Page xix
... Railroad Co. ( second case page 207 ) Damages for wrongful death . T Teakle v . San Pedro Co ..... Damages for wrongful death - negligence , 185 276 Third Dist . Court , State ex rel . Peart v . 418 U Union Pac . Coal Co. , Farnsworth v ...
... Railroad Co. ( second case page 207 ) Damages for wrongful death . T Teakle v . San Pedro Co ..... Damages for wrongful death - negligence , 185 276 Third Dist . Court , State ex rel . Peart v . 418 U Union Pac . Coal Co. , Farnsworth v ...
Page xxii
... Railroad ( C. C. ) , 36 Fed . 102 198 Hays v . Boylan , 141 Ill . 400 175 Hall v . Gilman , 79 N. Y. Supp . 303 130 Hearne v . DeYoung , 111 Cal . 373 117 Houston C. F. C. Ry . Co. v . Jackson , 62 Tex . € 08 106 Hall v . Kellogg , 16 ...
... Railroad ( C. C. ) , 36 Fed . 102 198 Hays v . Boylan , 141 Ill . 400 175 Hall v . Gilman , 79 N. Y. Supp . 303 130 Hearne v . DeYoung , 111 Cal . 373 117 Houston C. F. C. Ry . Co. v . Jackson , 62 Tex . € 08 106 Hall v . Kellogg , 16 ...
Page xxiii
... Railroad , 62 Me . 488 203 Johnson v . Fargo , 77 N. E. 388 203 Jacksonville F. & W. Co. v . Penn . T. Mfg . Co. , 27 Fla . 1 106 Jossman v . Rice , 121 Mich . 270 82 Jordan v . Kavanaugh , 63 Iowa 152 40 Justice v . Lang , 52 N. Y. 323 ...
... Railroad , 62 Me . 488 203 Johnson v . Fargo , 77 N. E. 388 203 Jacksonville F. & W. Co. v . Penn . T. Mfg . Co. , 27 Fla . 1 106 Jossman v . Rice , 121 Mich . 270 82 Jordan v . Kavanaugh , 63 Iowa 152 40 Justice v . Lang , 52 N. Y. 323 ...
Page xxv
... Railroad Co. v . Houston , 95 U. S. 697 290 Ry . Co. v . Kellogg , 94 U. S. 469 340 Ry . Co. v . Holmes , 155 U. S. 137 Ryan v . Mooney , 49 Cal . 33 ..... 386 350 Richmond Ry . Co. v . Jones , 92 Ala . 218 Railway Co. v . Keefer , 44 ...
... Railroad Co. v . Houston , 95 U. S. 697 290 Ry . Co. v . Kellogg , 94 U. S. 469 340 Ry . Co. v . Holmes , 155 U. S. 137 Ryan v . Mooney , 49 Cal . 33 ..... 386 350 Richmond Ry . Co. v . Jones , 92 Ala . 218 Railway Co. v . Keefer , 44 ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
agreement alleged amend amount APPEAL from District appellant appellant's articles of incorporation assessment attorney authority bill of exceptions cause of action cited claim complaint Constitution contract contributory negligence corporation counsel damages deceased deed default defendant defendant's demurrer district court duty engine entered entitled error evidence exemption fact fendant filed findings FRICK full-paid capital stock Garfield county grade granted held homestead injury instruction intestate judge judgment jurisdiction jury justice lease Legislature levy liable liens material issues MCCARTY ment mileage motion negligence notice party person plaintiff pleadings purpose question Railroad reason reserved power respect respondent respondent's Revised Statutes 1898 rule Salt Lake City Salt Lake county servant stockholders STRAUP sufficient sustained switch term testified thereof tion track train treasury stock trial court Utah vacate judgment verdict witness
Popular passages
Page 186 - Every such action shall be brought by and in the name of the personal representative of such deceased person...
Page 429 - States provides that full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the judicial proceedings of every other state.
Page 472 - Administration may be granted to one or more competent persons, although not otherwise entitled to the same, at the written request of the person entitled, filed in the court.
Page 341 - The question always is: Was there an unbroken connection between the wrongful act and the injury, a continuous operation? Did the facts constitute a continuous succession of events, so linked together as to make a natural whole, or was there sottfe new and Independent cause intervening between the wrong and the injury?
Page 68 - ... the plaintiff must recover upon the strength of his own title, and not upon the weakness of that of the defendant...
Page 188 - And where the testimony leaves the matter uncertain and shows that any one of half a dozen things may have brought about the injury, for some of which the employer is responsible and for some of which he is not, it is not for the jury to guess between these half a dozen causes and find that the negligence of the employer was the real cause, when there is no satisfactory foundation in the testimony for that conclusion.
Page 368 - ... then also against such other person. In every action under this and the preceding section such damages may be given as under all the circumstances of the case may be just.
Page 407 - ... to its own use to the damage of the plaintiff in the sum of $100,000 and interest at 6 per cent, from the date of the demand and refusal.
Page 206 - The true rule is that what is the proximate cause of an Injury is ordinarily a question for the jury. It is not a question of science or legal knowledge. It is to be determined as a fact, in view of the circumstances of fact attending It.
Page 66 - In ejectment, the plaintiff must recover, if at all, upon the strength of his own title and not upon the weakness of the title of the defendant.