Organizational Justice and Human Resource ManagementWhy are some acts, but not others, perceived to be fair? How do people who experience unfairness respond toward those held accountable for the unfairness? Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management reviews the theoretical organizational justice literature and explores how the research on justice applies to various topics in organizational behavior, including personnel selection systems, performance appraisal, and the role of fairness in resolving workplace conflict. Authors Robert Folger and Russell Cropanzano introduce a framework of organizational justiceùFairness Theoryùthat integrates previous work in this area by focusing on accountability for events with negative impact on material or psychological well-being. The book concludes with a chapter highlighting those topics that represent promising future directions for research. Researchers, scholars, and doctoral-level students in human resources, organizational behavior, and ethics will find this a timely, thought-provoking resource. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 29
Page xvii
... individual inclinations tug people into social groups as a means of fulfilling their needs . Conse- quently , most of ... self - interest into account . A job applicant might accept the position that offers the highest pay ( although he ...
... individual inclinations tug people into social groups as a means of fulfilling their needs . Conse- quently , most of ... self - interest into account . A job applicant might accept the position that offers the highest pay ( although he ...
Page xx
... self - interest partially in check so that something is left for other members of the group . Justice norms develop ... own behavior and the behavior of others . For example , we know that if we take too big a portion of the profits for ...
... self - interest partially in check so that something is left for other members of the group . Justice norms develop ... own behavior and the behavior of others . For example , we know that if we take too big a portion of the profits for ...
Page xxvi
... own good at the expense of others . We shall term this moral self - interest . On the other hand , there is also genetic self - interest . For instance , certain behaviors make it more or less likely that , on average , one's genes will ...
... own good at the expense of others . We shall term this moral self - interest . On the other hand , there is also genetic self - interest . For instance , certain behaviors make it more or less likely that , on average , one's genes will ...
Page 19
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
Page 22
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
Contents
1 | |
Chapter 2 Process as Procedural and Interactional Justice | 25 |
Chapter 3 Two Theoretical Syntheses | 50 |
On the Horns of a Justice Dilemma? | 81 |
Test and Trial Metaphors | 108 |
Social Accounts Third Parties and Grievance Systems | 133 |
Chapter 7 Toward a General Theory of Fairness | 173 |
Chapter 8 Future Directions | 197 |
References | 236 |
Author Index | 264 |
Subject Index | 272 |
About the Authors | 277 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
actions Agent applicants aspects behavior Bies causal chapter cognitive cognitive distortion cognitive-abilities tests concepts conduct conflict consequences considered context counterfactual Cropanzano decision maker discussion disputants distributive justice drug testing effects employees equity equity theory evaluations evidence example exchange experience explanation factors Fairness Theory field study Folger Gilliland Greenberg harm impact implications individuals inequity injustice inputs intentions interactional justice interpersonal sensitivity interviews involve Konovsky layoff less Lewis Lind mediation Michael Lewis moral motives negative norms noted obligations organization Organizational Behavior organizational justice outcomes participants perceived fairness perceptions performance appraisal person perspective positive potential procedural fairness procedural justice process control psychological contract Psychology psychometric ratings reactions reason referred relevant responses Retributive Justice role Salomon Salomon Brothers selection self-interest Shapiro smoking ban social accounts someone subordinates suggests supervisor tend Thibaut and Walker third party tions treated Tyler unfair validity voice workplace