Page images
PDF
EPUB

[Third indorsement.]

EXECUTIVE BUREAU,
Manila, April 23, 1903.

Respectfully referred to Messrs. Hartigan, Marple, Solignac, McCabe & Gutierrez, attorneys at law, Manila, inclosing additional information in this case, and requesting prompt return of all papers with such comment as they may see fit to make. A. W. FERGUSSON, Executive Secretary.

[Fourth indorsement.]

MANILA, May 2, 1903.

Respectfully returned to Hon. A. W. Fergusson, executive secretary, asking attention to the further statement of the parish priest of San Rafael and the affidavit of Rev. Juan de la Rosa, who consecrated the cemetery in the year 1882, with translations thereof.

HARTIGAN, MARPLE, SOLIGNAC, MCCABE & GUTIERREZ,
Counsel to the Archdiocese of Manila.

(What the additional statement was, which is mentioned in the fourth indorsement, does not appear from the record.)

[Fifth indorsement.]

OFFICE OF THE CIVIL GOVERNOR,
BAGUIO, BENGUET, May 9, 1903.

Respectfully returned to the governor of Bulacan, inviting attention to the additional evidence submitted by the parish priest, together with the affidavits of the priest who blessed the cemetery, and requesting that a much fuller investigation be made, not only as to the case of where the cemetery was, but as to what was used as a cemetery at the time of the burial, and whether what was used included the place of burial in this instance. The question is one of actual possession, not title.

[Sixth indorsement.]

WM. H. TAFT, Civil Governor.

OFFICE OF THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNOR,
PROVINCE OF BULACAN,

Malolos, P. I., May 26, 1903.

Respectfully returned to the executive secretary, together with the information

and papers in this matter.

PABLO TECSON, Provincial Governor.

(This second report of the provincial officials covers seven pages, and confirms and strengthens the former.)

[Seventh indorsement.]

OFFICE OF THE CIVIL GOVERNOR, Baguio, Benguet, June 13, 1903. Respectfully referred to Messrs, Hartigan, Marple, Solignac, McCabe & Gutierrez, inviting attention to the decision of Governor Tecson upon the question of actual control of the cemetery where the burial took place and the evidence upon which his decision proceeded.

It seems to me that the decision is correct and that the cemetery was a municipal cemetery de facto. Whether the title was in the church is a question for adjudication which may be raised in the ordinary way, but the action of the president in ordering the burial to take place where it did take place was an order affecting property in actual control and custody of the municipality, and therefore offers no occasion for discipline of the president. The church authorities may have recourse to the court of first instance to test the title and oust the municipality, if it has been and is in unlawful possession. The return of these papers is requested.

WM. H. TAFT, Civil Governor.

EXHIBIT NO. 19.

[First indorsement.]

OFFICE OF THE CIVIL GOVERNOR OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, Manila, P. I., July 14, 1903. Respectfully forwarded to the Hon. Juan Cailles, provincial governor of La Laguna, calling his attention to the within communication. If, as stated, the municipal council of Lilio has passed an ordinance levying a tax upon the ringing of church bells when certain ceremonies are performed, the councilors have acted improvidently and in excess of their authority. The only authority given the municipal council to levy taxes is found in the municipal code, in which the subject of taxation is specifically enumerated, and any others are prohibited. It is desired that you promptly notify the municipal council of Lilio of the impropriety of its action and see that the ordinance is repealed.

LUKE E. WRIGHT, Acting Civil Governor.

EXHIBIT No. 20.

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY, PROVINCE OF CAVITE,
Cavite, P. I., October 24, 1901.

Honorable CIVIL GOVERNOR, Manila, P. I.
SIR: In the minutes of the quarterly meeting of the municipal presidents, pre-
scribed by article 4 of act No. 136, held in Cavite on the 21st of the current month,
appears the following, which, having been submitted for approval by the provincial
board in their regular session of this day, I have the honor to transmit to the United
States Philippine Commission through your honored self:

"VII.-Resolved, On motion of the municipal president of San Roque, to recommend to the Civil Commission, through the provincial board of Cavite, the unanimous expression of opinion of the municipal presidents of the pueblos of this province that the question of the friars should be promptly and effectively settled, as it is a matter of primary importance, for the friars, or those who purport to represent them, are making manifestations of such a character that (although, fortunately, up to the present date they have been peaceable) they may result any day in tumult and a breach of the peace, a condition that would be very subversive to the well-being of the inhabitants of this province, which should be the supreme care of the government of the Philippines, according to the wishes of the unfortunate ex-President of the United States, Mr. McKinley, expressed in the instructions given to the Civil Commission in regard to the form of government in these islands."

I have the honor to transmit the above resolution, that due notice may be taken thereof.

[blocks in formation]

SIR: The committee of the lawsuit against the Recoleto friars sends me the following communication:

"THE MUNICIPAL PRESIDENT OF IMUS.

"SIR: This committee has the honor to inform you that this morning Mr. Gregor, agent of the house which is the so-called purchaser of the San Juan estate, has gone over the land of this pueblo from the bridge of the barrio of Palico to the boundary of Bacoor, with an apparatus or instrument similar to those used for surveying, stopping at the street corners, accompanied by two American soldiers armed with rifles. As this affects or prejudices the lawsuit which is being followed by the pueblo, the committee begs you to take the necessary action for this gentleman to be prevented to go on with his operation and to apply to the proper authorities so that he may not be given a military escort, under whose protection he is acting to the prejudice of the rights of the pueblo."

I, in my turn, communicate the facts to you, and beg you to see the constituted authorities, so that the military commander of this pueblo be restrained from giving his help to said Mr. Gregor in a matter which is before the courts, and in order to avoid disorders which might have serious consequences.

LINRIO TOPACIO,

Municipal President.

[First indorsement.]

OFFICE OF THE CIVIL GOVERNOR OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS,
Manila, P. I., October 15, 1901.

Respectfully referred to the commanding general Division of the Philippines and military governor.

This subject of friars' lands in Cavite is a most delicate one. On some accounts it is the most troublesome question that we are likely to have here. I have been attempting, through an agent whom I have sent down into Cavite, to obtain some idea of the value of the lands with a possible view to their purchase by the insular government, but the agent whom I sent, I have been informed, was turned back from the land by two soldiers. I respectfully request that the officer in command be directed not to interfere with my surveyor. The frenzy that these people can get into in regard to the friars' lands is almost impossible to believe. I suggest that each party would better be left to his legal rights, without assistance except from the officers of the court.

WM. H. TAFT, Civil Governor.

HEADQUARTERS DIVISION Of the PhilippINES,
Manila, P. I., October 17, 1901.

Respectfully referred to the commanding officer, Imus, Cavite, for report and explanation as to why soldiers are acting as escort to and guarding any surveyor. This is not a soldier's duty and should not be permitted unless ordered by higher authority. A full explanation of this incident will be made. These papers to be returned through military channels. By order of Major-General Chaffee:

J. S. KERR, Assistant Adjutant-General.

[Third indorsement.]

IMUS, CAVITE PROVINCE, P. I., October 23, 1901. Respectfully referred to First Lieut. A. V. P. Anderson, Sixth Cavalry, who was in command of this station October 11, 1901. Information is desired as to whether a guard was furnished Mr. McGregor from this station on or about October 11, 1901; also whether, to his knowledge, any American soldiers have turned back a surveyor sent here by the civil governor or have had any orders to do so.

B. T. SIMMONS,

Captain, Fourth Infantry, Commanding.

[Fourth indorsement.]

IMUS, CAVITE PROVINCE, P. I., October 25, 1901. Respectfully returned with the information that Mr. McGregor was furnished with no escort on or about October 11, nor upon any other date during the time I commanded this post. At about the date above mentioned there were two enlisted men from San Francisco de Malabon (headquarters of the Fourth Infantry) making an authorized road sketch of the country in the vicinity of this post and Bacoor, with an armed escort, and it occurs to the undersigned that Mr. McGregor may have been seen by some native in conversation with this detachment. I have reason to believe that Mr. McGregor, on the occasion of his recent visit to Imus, had in his possession no scientific instrument other than a camera. To my knowledge no surveyor has been turned back from this town by American soldiers. In the early part of this month a native surveyor presented me with a memorandum note from Maj. C. W. Mason, Fourth Infantry, stating that he (the surveyor) was in the employ of the civil government and that he desired access to a certain large blue-print map of the friars' lands in question. I gave this man permission to copy this map, and took him in person to the place where it hangs. He was, however, not satisfied, and desired the use of the tracing from which the blue print was made. I explained to him that we did not have the tracing, whereupon he left. I can hardly credit his statement, as there have been native surveyors employed by the pueblo frequently working in this vicinity, and they have never been molested by the troops. A. V. P. ANDERSON, First Lieutenant, Sixth Cavalry.

[Fifth indorsement.]

IMUS, CAVITE PROVINCE, P. I., October 27, 1901. Respectfully returned through military channels to the adjutant-general, Division of the Philippines. An escort was furnished to Mr. McGregor to San Nicolas on or about July 20, 1901, in compliance with instructions from the adjutant-general, first district, Department of Southern Luzon. Since that date no guard has been furnished him or any surveyor. If any American soldier has turned back any surveyor sent to this station by the civil governor he has done so without authority. I do not believe such to have been the case.

In justice to the officers who have commanded or may command this station, it is requested that credence be not given to statements made by natives concerning the official acts of those officers until they have been investigated.

B. T. SIMMONS,

Captain, Fourth U. S. Infantry, Commanding.

[Sixth indorsement.]

HEADQUARTERS THIRD SEPARATE BRIGADE,

DEPARTMENT OF SOUTHERN LUZON,

Batangas, Batangas Province, P. I., November 3, 1901.

Respectfully forwarded to the adjutant-general, Department of Southern Luzon. There does not seem to have been a guard furnished as reported (October 11, 1901). The records of this office show a guard was furnished Mr. McGregor on July 18. I was absent from my headquarters at that time and can not say why such detail was made. I am aware of the strong feeling about these lands, and have always been averse to the question coming up under present unsettled conditions.

S. S. SUMNER,

Brig. Gen., U. S. Army, Commanding.

[Seventh indorsement.]

HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF SOUTHERN LUZON,
Manila, P. I., November 8, 1901.

Respectfully returned to the adjutant-general, Division of the Philippines; attention invited to the fourth, fifth, and sixth indorsements.

J. P. WADE,

Brig. Gen., U. S. Army, Commanding.

[Eighth indorsement.]

HEADQUARTERS DIVISION OF THE PHILIPPINES,

Manila, P. I., November 14, 1901

Respectfully returned to the Hon. Luke E. Wright, vice-civil governor of the Philippine Islands, Manila, P. I., inviting attention to preceding indorsements. There does not appear to be any ground for the within complaint.

ADNA R. CHAFFEE,
Maj. Gen., U. S. Army, Commanding.

EXHIBIT NO. 22.

[Telegram.]

Governor TRIAS, Cavite:

MANILA, November 9, 1902.

I have been informed that forcible possession has been taken of a church in Caridad which has been until now in the peaceable possession and under the control of a priest of the Roman Catholic Church. Such dispossession is an unlawful act. If the church building is claimed by the municipality, its rights must be asserted in court. They can not be vindicated by the strong hand under a government of law and order. I rely on you to preserve the peace and to prevent the people of a municipality from violating the law. You ought not to take sides, as governor, in the religious controversies, but you must preserve the law and restrain its violation, no matter who is the violator. I rely on you to do so.

WAR 1903-VOL 5- -18

TAFT, Civil Governor.

[Telegram.]

CAVITE, November 10, 1902.

Governor TAFT, Manita:

Church in La Caridad is a building in construction since long ago without being completed, and was not under any possession, control, nor had been used for any religious purpose. Since last Saturday up to date I did not assist in any religious festival during the fiestas of Cavite and San Roque. Last Saturday I had been, for precaution, at the place in Cavite where they were going to say mass in the new church, and without alighting from my carriage, in order to see personally the appearance of things, and it is not true, as per newspapers, that I had been present at the time, as at the said time I was holding a meeting of the provincial board. No official or employee of the government has taken part officially in the various fiestas in Cavite, for it is a custom-there is a board of festival which has the official representation, composed of civilians, and the said board is in charge of the organization of the fiesta and its carrying into effect, and the town expenses. It is also not true that the municipality of La Caridad had invited Priest Aglipay to the said town, but a committee composed of civilians.

TRIAS, Governor.

EXHIBIT No. 23.

CAVITE, June 10, 1902.

The CIVIL GOVERNOR OF THE PHILIPPINES: The undersigned, natives and residents of Cavite, San Roque, and La Caridad, say that they are deeply aggrieved by the prohibition made by the municipality of La Caridad to bury any more bodies in the Catholic cemetery, which has been built in an isolated lot north of La Caridad for the use of the three pueblos; it has existed sixty years without ever being closed, even during the terrible epidemic of 1882, and there is no law authorizing such a measure, which hurts deeply the feelings of all good Catholics. If the prohibition has been decided as a sanitary measure, it is a serious mistake, as the place which has been chosen by the municipality for a burial ground is in the pueblo itself and is not fenced around, so that the bodies may be dug out by stray animals and become their prey, whereas the Catholic cemetery is built of stone and mortar and surrounded with a wall. Since the Catholic cemeteries of Manila are open, as well as those of the other pueblos of the province, the undersigned protest against the closing of their graveyard, which deprives Catholic families of the consolation of having their dear ones buried in holy ground, and beg you to order that the Catholic cemetery be reopened and that the municipality of La Caridad be enjoined from taking any measures against the burial of Catholics therein. (Signed by J. C. Ruyman and many others.)

OFFICE OF HARTIGAN, MARPLE & SOLIGNAC,
ATTOREYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW,
Manila, P. I., June 3, 1903.

The ACTING CIVIL GOVERNOR, Manila, P. I.
SIR: We are directed by the bishop-administrator of the archdiocese of Manila to
ask your attention to the action of the municipal board of La Caridad, in the prov-
ince of Cavite, in relation to the Catholic cemetery situated in that town, and used
as a cemetery for the towns of Cavite, San Roque, and La Caridad. On May 23 of
this year the man in charge of the cemetery reported to Father Caballeria, of Cavite,
that he had received instructions to allow no more interments in the cemetery.
Later the president of the town of La Caridad informed Father Caballeria that this
order had been issued because the cemetery was in an unsanitary condition and
because what was to be interred passed through the town of La Caridad. We are
further directed to state that it is believed the cemetery is in good sanitary condition.
Immediately thereafter Father Caballeria, for the archdiocese of Manila, was
granted a cemetery in a place called Lascaran in the pueblo of La Caridad by the
owners thereof for use as a Catholic cemetery. The town authorities of La Caridad
will not allow Father Caballeria to bury anyone in this latter ground, as they claim
they want to use it for a municipal cemetery and a source of revenue to the munic-
ipality.

We are, very respectfully,

HARTIGAN, MARPLE & SOLIGNAC,
Counsel to the Archdiocese of Manila.

« PreviousContinue »