United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Volume 428United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 1978 - Courts |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 81
Page 31
... Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner. 1 Opinion of the Court ticularly in ... federal courts . See , e . g . , Hawkins v . United States , 358 U. S. 74 , 78 ( 1958 ) ; Tot v . United States ...
... Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner. 1 Opinion of the Court ticularly in ... federal courts . See , e . g . , Hawkins v . United States , 358 U. S. 74 , 78 ( 1958 ) ; Tot v . United States ...
Page 113
... Federal courts must hesitate before resolving a contro- versy , even one within their constitutional power to resolve , on the basis of the rights of third persons not parties to the litigation . The reasons are two . First , the courts ...
... Federal courts must hesitate before resolving a contro- versy , even one within their constitutional power to resolve , on the basis of the rights of third persons not parties to the litigation . The reasons are two . First , the courts ...
Page 121
... courts of appeals , to be exercised on the facts of individual cases . We announce no gen- eral rule . Certainly there are circumstances in which a federal appellate court is justified in resolving an issue not passed on below , as ...
... courts of appeals , to be exercised on the facts of individual cases . We announce no gen- eral rule . Certainly there are circumstances in which a federal appellate court is justified in resolving an issue not passed on below , as ...
Page 123
... U. S. 26 , 40-46 ( 1976 ) . II We noted in Warth , and the Court is careful to reiter- ate today , ante , at 112 , that the Art . III standing inquiry often is only the first of two inquiries necessary to determine whether a federal court ...
... U. S. 26 , 40-46 ( 1976 ) . II We noted in Warth , and the Court is careful to reiter- ate today , ante , at 112 , that the Art . III standing inquiry often is only the first of two inquiries necessary to determine whether a federal court ...
Page 124
... U.S. This second inquiry is a matter of " judicial self- governance . " Warth v . Seldin , supra , at 509. The usual - and wise - stance of the federal courts when policing their own exercise of power in this manner is one of cautious ...
... U.S. This second inquiry is a matter of " judicial self- governance . " Warth v . Seldin , supra , at 509. The usual - and wise - stance of the federal courts when policing their own exercise of power in this manner is one of cautious ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abortion affirmed aggravating circumstances amicus curiae antitrust application arbitration argued the cause argument Attorney BLACKMUN Boys Markets BRENNAN brief California capital punishment certiorari checkpoint claims coal committed Congress consent constitutionally convicted Court of Appeals crime criminal cruel and unusual death penalty death sentence decision defendant deterrent dissenting 428 U.S. District Court effect Eighth Amendment Eighth and Fourteenth employees enforcement evidence exclusionary rule federal courts federal habeas felony filed first-degree murder Florida Fourteenth Amendments Fourth Amendment Furman Georgia Gregg guilty habeas corpus imposed imposition injunction issue judge judicial jurisdiction jury JUSTICE legislative liability Louisiana mandatory death ment miner Missouri Norris-LaGuardia Act North Carolina offense officer Operators Opinion of STEWART Parker person petitioner physician plurality pneumoconiosis police POWELL procedures provides question reasonable regulation REHNQUIST respondent Sherman Act Stat statute STEVENS Supp supra Supreme Court Texas tion total disability trial unconstitutional United verdict violation warrant
Popular passages
Page 524 - Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the Government's purposes are beneficent. Men born to freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of their liberty by evil-minded rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.
Page 70 - We deal with a right of privacy older than the Bill of Rights — older than our political parties, older than our school system. Marriage is a coming together for better or for worse, hopefully enduring, and intimate to the degree of being sacred.
Page 6 - Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Labor of the Senate Committee on Labor and Public Welfare on S.
Page 76 - ... (b) For the stage subsequent to approximately the end of the first trimester, the State, in promoting its interest in the health of the mother, may, if it chooses, regulate the abortion procedure in ways that are reasonably related to maternal health.
Page 569 - The scheme of the Fourth Amendment becomes meaningful only when it is assured that at some point the conduct of those charged with enforcing the laws can be subjected to the more detached, neutral scrutiny of a judge who must evaluate the reasonableness of a particular search or seizure in light of the particular circumstances.
Page 634 - In their exercise it has been customary in England from time immemorial, and in this country from its first colonization, to regulate ferries, common carriers, hackmen, bakers, millers, wharfingers, innkeepers, etc., and in so doing to fix a maximum of charge to be made for services rendered, accommodations furnished, and articles sold.
Page 173 - The Amendment must draw its meaning from the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society.
Page 484 - Court itself recognized that the purpose of the exclusionary rule "is to deter — to compel respect for the constitutional guaranty in the only effectively available way — by removing the incentive to disregard it.
Page 599 - As a charter of freedom, the Act has a generality and adaptability comparable to that found to be desirable in constitutional provisions.
Page 212 - ... (2) Whether, in cases other than treason or aircraft hijacking, the evidence supports the jury's or judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance as enumerated in section 27.2534.1 (b), and "(3) Whether the sentence of death is excessive or disproportionate to the penalty imposed in similar cases, considering both the crime and the defendant.