Patent Office Papers: 1914-1917, Volume 4Patent Office Society, 1912 - Patent laws and legislation |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 7
... question is that there are of record in the office many instruments that may affect title indirectly or equitably , but do not specifically refer directly thereto . It is a common practice for inventors , preparatory to even making an ...
... question is that there are of record in the office many instruments that may affect title indirectly or equitably , but do not specifically refer directly thereto . It is a common practice for inventors , preparatory to even making an ...
Page 12
... question has never been taken to the Supreme Court of the United States , so that we have these differing decisions . Consequently by an act of March 3 , 1897 , in view of these conflicting decisions of the circuit courts , Congress ...
... question has never been taken to the Supreme Court of the United States , so that we have these differing decisions . Consequently by an act of March 3 , 1897 , in view of these conflicting decisions of the circuit courts , Congress ...
Page 7
... question is that there are of record in the Office many instruments that may affect title indi- rectly or equitably , but do not specifically refer directly thereto . It is a common practice for inventors prepara- tory to even making an ...
... question is that there are of record in the Office many instruments that may affect title indi- rectly or equitably , but do not specifically refer directly thereto . It is a common practice for inventors prepara- tory to even making an ...
Page 16
... question of ownership or title was not under con- sideration when this decision was made , but it will be evident that an application which is a " continuation in part " and contains matter not common to both cases , would not be so ...
... question of ownership or title was not under con- sideration when this decision was made , but it will be evident that an application which is a " continuation in part " and contains matter not common to both cases , would not be so ...
Page 6
... question it is noted that neither the statutes nor the rules make any pro- vision for the filing of an oath to an application by any party other than the inventor so long as he is alive . ' When the inventor dies or becomes insane Sec ...
... question it is noted that neither the statutes nor the rules make any pro- vision for the filing of an oath to an application by any party other than the inventor so long as he is alive . ' When the inventor dies or becomes insane Sec ...
Common terms and phrases
abandonment action aggregation amendment apparatus assignment attorney broad claim Circuit Court cited combination Commissioner construction construed Court of Appeals covered decision described device disclosed Division divisional application doctrine doctrine of equivalents drawing effect electric elements entitled Examiners-in-Chief Examining Corps fact filed follows foreign application foreign country foreign patent function Gebrauchsmuster held improvement infringement interference interference proceeding invention or discovery inventor involved issue joinder LAW REPORTER PRINTING letters patent limited machine manufacture matter means Medart ment monopoly novelty oath office classification operation original paper party patent granted patent law practice present Principal Examiner principle printed publication prior art produce proper prosecution purpose question reason record reduction to practice reference reissue reissue application REPORTER PRINTING COMPANY res adjudicata result Revised Statutes Rule 46 Section Supreme Court thereof tion trade-mark transfer U. S. Patent Office United States Patent vention Westinghouse
Popular passages
Page 8 - ... in case of a machine, he shall explain the principle thereof, and the best mode in which he has contemplated applying that principle, so as to distinguish it from other inventions ; and he shall particularly point out and distinctly claim the part, improvement, or combination which he claims as his invention or discovery.
Page 24 - ... in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art or science to which it appertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make, construct, compound, and use the same...
Page 9 - ... improvement thereof not known or used by others in this country and not patented or described in any printed publication in this or any foreign country, before his invention or discovery thereof, and not in public use or on sale for more than two years prior to his application, unless the same is proved to have been abandoned, may, upon payment of the fees required by law, and other due proceedings had, obtain a patent therefor.
Page 15 - That he had surreptitiously or unjustly obtained the patent for that which was in fact invented by another, who was using reasonable diligence in adapting and perfecting the same; or, Third.
Page 13 - ... not known or used by others in this country before his invention or discovery thereof, and not patented or described in any printed publication in this or any foreign country before his invention or discovery thereof...
Page 17 - ... by reason of its having been first patented or caused to be patented by the inventor or his legal representatives. or assigns in a foreign country, unless the application for said foreign patent was filed more than twelve months...
Page 27 - A registered mark or a mark for which application to register has been filed shall be assignable with the good will of the business in which the mark is used...
Page 19 - ... has not been patented in any country foreign to the United States on an application filed by him or his legal representatives or assigns more than twelve months prior to this application; and that no application for patent on said invention has been filed by him or his representatives or assigns in any country foreign to the United States...