Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright CasesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1892 - Copyright "Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U. S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 74
Page 12
... involved , because , the application being allowable , their full appellate function has either been discharged or has not been in- voked by reason of the favorable action of the Primary Examiner . When , however , a motion of the other ...
... involved , because , the application being allowable , their full appellate function has either been discharged or has not been in- voked by reason of the favorable action of the Primary Examiner . When , however , a motion of the other ...
Page 14
... involved in determining whether the inventions were the same or different , reversed the decision of the Primary Examiner and held that an interference in fact existed . In Scott v . Hawkins ( 33 ′′ MS . Dec. , 418 ) the motion to ...
... involved in determining whether the inventions were the same or different , reversed the decision of the Primary Examiner and held that an interference in fact existed . In Scott v . Hawkins ( 33 ′′ MS . Dec. , 418 ) the motion to ...
Page 17
... involved in the interfer- ence , under Rule 132 . Application of Leo Ehrlich filed May 22 , 1888 , No. 274,700 . Applica- tion of William Van Horn filed February 9 , 1888 , No. 263,434 . Messrs . Knight Brothers for Ehrlich . Mr ...
... involved in the interfer- ence , under Rule 132 . Application of Leo Ehrlich filed May 22 , 1888 , No. 274,700 . Applica- tion of William Van Horn filed February 9 , 1888 , No. 263,434 . Messrs . Knight Brothers for Ehrlich . Mr ...
Page 20
... involved in that suit was granted November 19 , 1833. At the trial evidence was offered tending to show that the improvement claimed in the patent had been invented and reduced to practice by another person in 1828 , and that such ...
... involved in that suit was granted November 19 , 1833. At the trial evidence was offered tending to show that the improvement claimed in the patent had been invented and reduced to practice by another person in 1828 , and that such ...
Page 34
... involved . This case of Hill v . Wooster is authority for the proposition that the issue presented by a proceeding under section 4915 is not a mere issue of priority as between two parties to a former interference in the Patent Office ...
... involved . This case of Hill v . Wooster is authority for the proposition that the issue presented by a proceeding under section 4915 is not a mere issue of priority as between two parties to a former interference in the Patent Office ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Abraham G action affirmed alleged allowed amendment apparatus appeal application assignment bill Brush Electric Company circuit court claims combination Commissioner Company complainant complainant's construction court of equity Decided decision decree defendant defendant's demurrer denied described device diligence District drawings electric entitled equity evidence Examiner of Interferences Examiners-in-Chief exclusive right February 15 filed follows ground held Hisey ice-box improvement infringement injunction interference in fact interference proceeding invention inventor issue judgment June June 16 Letters Patent license Ligowsky machine manufacture matter mechanism ment Messrs novelty November 28 operation opinion original party Patent Office petition petitioner plaintiff plows practice present Primary Examiner prior prior art profits proof purpose question ratchet-wheel reason referred registration reissue rejected Revised Statutes rule sell Shepard & Co shown SIMONDS sold specification substantially suit Supreme Court testimony thereof tion torsional spring Trade-Mark United valve
Popular passages
Page 557 - That he had surreptitiously or unjustly obtained the patent for that which was in fact invented by another, who was using reasonable diligence in adapting and perfecting the same; or, Third.
Page 443 - Mr. Chief Justice FULLER, after stating the facts as above, delivered the opinion of the Court. The bill was filed in the Circuit Court of...
Page 511 - It was never the object of those laws to grant a monopoly for every trifling device, every shadow of a shade of an idea which would naturally and spontaneously occur to any skilled mechanic or operator in the ordinary progress of manufactures.
Page 186 - That every person or corporation who has, or shall have, purchased or constructed any newly Invented machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, prior to the application by the inventor or discoverer for a patent, shall be held to possess the right to use, and vend to others to be used, the specific machine, manufacture, or composition of matter so made or purchased, without liability therefor...
Page 273 - Office a caveat setting forth the object and the distinguishing characteristics of the invention, and praying protection of his right until he shall have matured his invention. S>uch caveat shall be filed in the confidential archives of the office and preserved in secrecy, and shall be operative for the term of one year from the filing thereof.
Page 509 - We hold, therefore, that if, in the eye of an ordinary observer, giving such attention as a purchaser usually gives, two designs are substantially the same, if the resemblance is such as to deceive such an observer, inducing him to purchase one supposing it to be the other, the first one patented is infringed by the other.
Page 539 - I will show you how the judges have heretofore allowed of monopoly patents, which is, that where any man by his own charge and industry or by his own wit or invention doth bring any new trade into the realm, or any engine tending to the furtherance of a trade that never was used before — and that for the good of the realm...
Page 389 - Navy, and need not be repeated here. It is sufficient to say that the outbreak of war when it did come found our nation not unprepared to meet the conflict.
Page 390 - that the laws of the several States, except where the constitution, treaties, or statutes of the United States shall otherwise require or provide, shall be regarded as rules of decision in trials at common law in the courts of the United States, in cases where they apply.
Page 576 - Whenever there are interfering patents, any person interested in any one of them, or in the working of the invention claimed under either of them, may have relief against the interfering patentee, and all parties interested under him, by suit in equity against the owners of the interfering patent ; and the court, on notice to adverse parties, and other due proceedings had according to the course of equity...