Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright CasesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1892 - Copyright "Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U. S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 2
... ground that said claims were for indivisible parts of the same invention covered by said patent . Applicant now appeals from this decision . The question to be decided then is , Is ap- plicant's Patent No. 386,974 a sufficient reference ...
... ground that said claims were for indivisible parts of the same invention covered by said patent . Applicant now appeals from this decision . The question to be decided then is , Is ap- plicant's Patent No. 386,974 a sufficient reference ...
Page 5
... ground that to do so would be to revive a forfeited case without requiring a new fee . Whether the reason given by the Examiner is the only one or not , I think it must be regarded as sufficient . The present practice of the Patent ...
... ground that to do so would be to revive a forfeited case without requiring a new fee . Whether the reason given by the Examiner is the only one or not , I think it must be regarded as sufficient . The present practice of the Patent ...
Page 9
... ground that no interference in fact exists lies directly to the Com- missioner and not to the Examiners - in - Chief . ( Rule 124. ) 2. SAME QUESTION RAISED BY SUCH MOTION . The only question raised by a motion to dissolve for want of ...
... ground that no interference in fact exists lies directly to the Com- missioner and not to the Examiners - in - Chief . ( Rule 124. ) 2. SAME QUESTION RAISED BY SUCH MOTION . The only question raised by a motion to dissolve for want of ...
Page 10
... ground that no interference in fact exists . ( Rule 122. ) The Primary Examiner denied the motion . On the 10th of October an appeal was taken to the Examiners - in - Chief in the following lan- guage : In the matter of the interference ...
... ground that no interference in fact exists . ( Rule 122. ) The Primary Examiner denied the motion . On the 10th of October an appeal was taken to the Examiners - in - Chief in the following lan- guage : In the matter of the interference ...
Page 12
... ground of want of de facto interference and the Examiner attempts to decide some question relating to the merits , appeal will nevertheless lie to the Commissioner , who , unless he elects to exercise his super- visory jurisdiction ...
... ground of want of de facto interference and the Examiner attempts to decide some question relating to the merits , appeal will nevertheless lie to the Commissioner , who , unless he elects to exercise his super- visory jurisdiction ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Abraham G action affirmed alleged allowed amendment apparatus appeal application assignment bill Brush Electric Company circuit court claims combination Commissioner Company complainant complainant's construction court of equity Decided decision decree defendant defendant's demurrer denied described device diligence District drawings electric entitled equity evidence Examiner of Interferences Examiners-in-Chief exclusive right February 15 filed follows ground held Hisey ice-box improvement infringement injunction interference in fact interference proceeding invention inventor issue judgment June June 16 Letters Patent license Ligowsky machine manufacture matter mechanism ment Messrs novelty November 28 operation opinion original party Patent Office petition petitioner plaintiff plows practice present Primary Examiner prior prior art profits proof purpose question ratchet-wheel reason referred registration reissue rejected Revised Statutes rule sell Shepard & Co shown SIMONDS sold specification substantially suit Supreme Court testimony thereof tion torsional spring Trade-Mark United valve
Popular passages
Page 557 - That he had surreptitiously or unjustly obtained the patent for that which was in fact invented by another, who was using reasonable diligence in adapting and perfecting the same; or, Third.
Page 443 - Mr. Chief Justice FULLER, after stating the facts as above, delivered the opinion of the Court. The bill was filed in the Circuit Court of...
Page 511 - It was never the object of those laws to grant a monopoly for every trifling device, every shadow of a shade of an idea which would naturally and spontaneously occur to any skilled mechanic or operator in the ordinary progress of manufactures.
Page 186 - That every person or corporation who has, or shall have, purchased or constructed any newly Invented machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, prior to the application by the inventor or discoverer for a patent, shall be held to possess the right to use, and vend to others to be used, the specific machine, manufacture, or composition of matter so made or purchased, without liability therefor...
Page 273 - Office a caveat setting forth the object and the distinguishing characteristics of the invention, and praying protection of his right until he shall have matured his invention. S>uch caveat shall be filed in the confidential archives of the office and preserved in secrecy, and shall be operative for the term of one year from the filing thereof.
Page 509 - We hold, therefore, that if, in the eye of an ordinary observer, giving such attention as a purchaser usually gives, two designs are substantially the same, if the resemblance is such as to deceive such an observer, inducing him to purchase one supposing it to be the other, the first one patented is infringed by the other.
Page 539 - I will show you how the judges have heretofore allowed of monopoly patents, which is, that where any man by his own charge and industry or by his own wit or invention doth bring any new trade into the realm, or any engine tending to the furtherance of a trade that never was used before — and that for the good of the realm...
Page 389 - Navy, and need not be repeated here. It is sufficient to say that the outbreak of war when it did come found our nation not unprepared to meet the conflict.
Page 390 - that the laws of the several States, except where the constitution, treaties, or statutes of the United States shall otherwise require or provide, shall be regarded as rules of decision in trials at common law in the courts of the United States, in cases where they apply.
Page 576 - Whenever there are interfering patents, any person interested in any one of them, or in the working of the invention claimed under either of them, may have relief against the interfering patentee, and all parties interested under him, by suit in equity against the owners of the interfering patent ; and the court, on notice to adverse parties, and other due proceedings had according to the course of equity...