Linear Operators, Part 2 |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 77
Page 884
... proved by Gelfand and Nai- mark [ 1 ] . In their proof , they proved Lemma 3.5 by using a fairly deep result of Šilov that was not generally available . The proof of this lemma given here is that given by Arens [ 6 ] , who has also ...
... proved by Gelfand and Nai- mark [ 1 ] . In their proof , they proved Lemma 3.5 by using a fairly deep result of Šilov that was not generally available . The proof of this lemma given here is that given by Arens [ 6 ] , who has also ...
Page 964
... proved , we obtain ( 7E ( e ) g , 7g1 ) = ( E ( e ) g , 81 ) = f ̧ ( tg ) ( m ) ( tg1 ) ( m ) μ ( dm ) . Since this identity is valid for any g1 in L2 ( R ) , we conclude that T ( E ( e ) g ) ( m ) = g ( m ) for u - almost all m in e ...
... proved , we obtain ( 7E ( e ) g , 7g1 ) = ( E ( e ) g , 81 ) = f ̧ ( tg ) ( m ) ( tg1 ) ( m ) μ ( dm ) . Since this identity is valid for any g1 in L2 ( R ) , we conclude that T ( E ( e ) g ) ( m ) = g ( m ) for u - almost all m in e ...
Page 1133
... proved . Q.E.D. We have also proved the following corollary . 6 COROLLARY . The adjoint operator of the operator K of the preceding lemma is defined by the set K , of kernels defined by ij K * ( s , t ) = K ̧¡ ( t , 8 ) . The following ...
... proved . Q.E.D. We have also proved the following corollary . 6 COROLLARY . The adjoint operator of the operator K of the preceding lemma is defined by the set K , of kernels defined by ij K * ( s , t ) = K ̧¡ ( t , 8 ) . The following ...
Contents
BAlgebras | 859 |
Commutative BAlgebras | 868 |
Commutative BAlgebras | 874 |
Copyright | |
57 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
adjoint extension adjoint operator algebra analytic B-algebra Borel set boundary conditions boundary values bounded operator C₁ closed closure coefficients compact operator complex numbers continuous function converges Corollary deficiency indices Definition denote dense eigenvalues element equation essential spectrum Exercise exists finite dimensional follows from Lemma follows from Theorem follows immediately formal differential operator formally self adjoint formula Fourier function defined function f Haar measure Hence Hilbert space Hilbert-Schmidt operator identity inequality integral interval isometric isomorphism kernel L₁ L₁(R L₂(I L₂(R Lemma Let f linearly independent mapping matrix measure neighborhood non-zero norm operators in Hilbert orthogonal orthonormal basis Plancherel's theorem positive preceding lemma PROOF prove real axis real numbers satisfies sequence solution spectral spectral theorem square-integrable subspace Suppose T₁ T₂ theory To(t topology tr(T transform unique unitary vanishes vector zero