Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Judicature of the State of Indiana, Volume 112Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Francis Marion Dice, Augustus Newton Martin, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1888 - Law reports, digests, etc "With tables of the cases and principal matters" (varies). |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 87
Page 27
... injury upon him . SAME . - Principal and Agent . - Authority of Conductor.- When Terminated.— Responsibility of Carrier for Act of Agent . - Where a passenger enters a wrong train through a mistake of his own , the authority of the con ...
... injury upon him . SAME . - Principal and Agent . - Authority of Conductor.- When Terminated.— Responsibility of Carrier for Act of Agent . - Where a passenger enters a wrong train through a mistake of his own , the authority of the con ...
Page 29
... injury was due to him from the carrier . Where the directions of the conductor are within the scope of his authority , and obedience to them will not expose a passenger to known or to apparent danger which a prudent man would not incur ...
... injury was due to him from the carrier . Where the directions of the conductor are within the scope of his authority , and obedience to them will not expose a passenger to known or to apparent danger which a prudent man would not incur ...
Page 32
... injury while getting on the train , while they are on it , and while they are alighting . In the discharge of this ... injured by the negligence of other servants , the company is liable . Imhoff v . Chicago , etc. , R. R. Co. , 22 Wis ...
... injury while getting on the train , while they are on it , and while they are alighting . In the discharge of this ... injured by the negligence of other servants , the company is liable . Imhoff v . Chicago , etc. , R. R. Co. , 22 Wis ...
Page 50
... injured or killed . However that might be , it is cer- tain that , under the statutes prior to the acts of 1885 , such guards and cross - fences would not exonerate the railway company from liability for the injury or death of animals ...
... injured or killed . However that might be , it is cer- tain that , under the statutes prior to the acts of 1885 , such guards and cross - fences would not exonerate the railway company from liability for the injury or death of animals ...
Page 51
... injured or killed , the companies were held liable , except to the owner for whose benefit the cross- ing was ... injury or killing of animals upon the track at such crossings , there was no duty resting upon them to construct or ...
... injured or killed , the companies were held liable , except to the owner for whose benefit the cross- ing was ... injury or killing of animals upon the track at such crossings , there was no duty resting upon them to construct or ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
administrator affidavit alleged amount answer appellant appellee appellee's attorney authority averred Bank bill of exceptions board of commissioners bond cause of action Chicago Circuit Court cited City civil township claim clerk complaint construction contract costs creditors cross-complaint crossings damages debt defendant demurrer duty entitled error Evansville evidence ex rel executed executor facts fence Filed Nov held Indianapolis indictment injury issued Jacob Rubush Jarboe Jeffersonville John McIntire Judgment affirmed jury land land-owner liable lien Louis Louisville ment Morgan County mortgage motion negligence notice overruled paragraph party payment Pennsylvania Co person petition plaintiff plat pleading proceedings prosecuting provides question R. R. Co railroad company railway company real estate reason record recover rule statute struck jury sufficient suit supra surety sustained term Terre Haute therein thereof tion town township track train trial court trustee void
Popular passages
Page 356 - No association, or any member thereof, shall, during the time it shall continue its banking operations, withdraw, or permit to be withdrawn, either in the form of dividends or otherwise, any portion Of its capital.
Page 205 - Having no absolute right of recognition in other states, but depending for such recognition and the enforcement of its contracts upon their assent, it follows, as a matter of course, that such assent may be granted upon such terms and conditions as those states may think proper to impose.
Page 8 - All persons having an interest in the subject of the action and in obtaining the relief demanded...
Page 422 - The judge has to say whether any facts have been established by evidence from which negligence may be reasonably inferred : the jurors have to say whether from those facts, when submitted to them, negligence ought to be inferred. It is, in my opinion, of the greatest importance, in the administration of justice, that these separate functions should be maintained, and should be maintained distinct.
Page 137 - ... one person being in fault will not dispense with another's using ordinary care for himself Two things must concur to support this action. An obstruction in the road by the fault of the defendant, and no want of ordinary care to avoid it on the part of the plaintiff.
Page 411 - The proposition which these recognized cases suggest, and which is, therefore, to be deduced from them, is that whenever one person is by circumstances placed in such a position with regard to another that every one of ordinary sense who did think would at once recognize that, if he did not use ordinary care and skill in his own conduct with regard to those circumstances, he would cause danger of injury to the person or property of the other, a duty arises to use ordinary care and skill to avoid...
Page 137 - A party is not to cast himself upon an obstruction which has been made by the fault of another, and avail himself of it, if he do not himself use common and ordinary caution to be in the right.
Page 415 - ... it. It was possible for the defendant so to have constructed the guard, that such an accident as this could not have happened; and this, so far as appears, could have been done without unreasonable expense or trouble. If the defendant ought to have foreseen that such an accident might happen, of if such an accident could reasonably have been anticipated, the omission to provide against it would be actionable negligence.
Page 378 - No indictment is insufficient, nor can the trial, judgment, or other proceedings thereon be affected, by reason of a defect or imperfection in matter of form, which does not tend to the prejudice of the substantial rights of the defendant, upon the merits.
Page 79 - ... that business in the mind of the public the right to the mark or name is lost, despite the existence of purely subjective "intent...