Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Judicature of the State of Indiana, Volume 112Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Francis Marion Dice, Augustus Newton Martin, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1888 - Law reports, digests, etc "With tables of the cases and principal matters" (varies). |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 83
Page 6
... counsel for appellant , that the bond is defective by reason of the penalty being fixed at a definite sum , and that we must look to section 1221 , supra , as curing that defect , then we shall encounter that portion of the sec- tion ...
... counsel for appellant , that the bond is defective by reason of the penalty being fixed at a definite sum , and that we must look to section 1221 , supra , as curing that defect , then we shall encounter that portion of the sec- tion ...
Page 26
... counsel earnestly insist that the finding and order of the trial court herein were not sustained by sufficient evidence . We have carefully examined and con- sidered all the evidence appearing in the record , and we have reached the ...
... counsel earnestly insist that the finding and order of the trial court herein were not sustained by sufficient evidence . We have carefully examined and con- sidered all the evidence appearing in the record , and we have reached the ...
Page 34
... Counsel for the appellee dispose of the question whether the direction to the intestate to walk back to the station was within the line of the conductor's duty , by asserting that it is not an open question in Indiana , and refer us to ...
... Counsel for the appellee dispose of the question whether the direction to the intestate to walk back to the station was within the line of the conductor's duty , by asserting that it is not an open question in Indiana , and refer us to ...
Page 36
... counsel dispose of the question by saying : " It was not an opinion given or an act done within the scope of his employment or authority , but a friendly act on the part of the conductor toward the person who had taken the wrong train ...
... counsel dispose of the question by saying : " It was not an opinion given or an act done within the scope of his employment or authority , but a friendly act on the part of the conductor toward the person who had taken the wrong train ...
Page 48
... of the act . Appellee's counsel further states his position thus : " Even if the acts of April 8th and 13th , 1885 , as between the pub- The Pennsylvania Company v . Spaulding . lie and railway 48 SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA ,
... of the act . Appellee's counsel further states his position thus : " Even if the acts of April 8th and 13th , 1885 , as between the pub- The Pennsylvania Company v . Spaulding . lie and railway 48 SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA ,
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
administrator affidavit alleged amount answer appellant appellee appellee's attorney authority averred Bank bill of exceptions board of commissioners bond cause of action Chicago Circuit Court cited City civil township claim clerk complaint construction contract costs creditors cross-complaint crossings damages debt defendant demurrer duty entitled error Evansville evidence ex rel executed executor facts fence Filed Nov held Indianapolis indictment injury issued Jacob Rubush Jarboe Jeffersonville John McIntire Judgment affirmed jury land land-owner liable lien Louis Louisville ment Morgan County mortgage motion negligence notice overruled paragraph party payment Pennsylvania Co person petition plaintiff plat pleading proceedings prosecuting provides question R. R. Co railroad company railway company real estate reason record recover rule statute struck jury sufficient suit supra surety sustained term Terre Haute therein thereof tion town township track train trial court trustee void
Popular passages
Page 356 - No association, or any member thereof, shall, during the time it shall continue its banking operations, withdraw, or permit to be withdrawn, either in the form of dividends or otherwise, any portion Of its capital.
Page 205 - Having no absolute right of recognition in other states, but depending for such recognition and the enforcement of its contracts upon their assent, it follows, as a matter of course, that such assent may be granted upon such terms and conditions as those states may think proper to impose.
Page 8 - All persons having an interest in the subject of the action and in obtaining the relief demanded...
Page 422 - The judge has to say whether any facts have been established by evidence from which negligence may be reasonably inferred : the jurors have to say whether from those facts, when submitted to them, negligence ought to be inferred. It is, in my opinion, of the greatest importance, in the administration of justice, that these separate functions should be maintained, and should be maintained distinct.
Page 137 - ... one person being in fault will not dispense with another's using ordinary care for himself Two things must concur to support this action. An obstruction in the road by the fault of the defendant, and no want of ordinary care to avoid it on the part of the plaintiff.
Page 411 - The proposition which these recognized cases suggest, and which is, therefore, to be deduced from them, is that whenever one person is by circumstances placed in such a position with regard to another that every one of ordinary sense who did think would at once recognize that, if he did not use ordinary care and skill in his own conduct with regard to those circumstances, he would cause danger of injury to the person or property of the other, a duty arises to use ordinary care and skill to avoid...
Page 137 - A party is not to cast himself upon an obstruction which has been made by the fault of another, and avail himself of it, if he do not himself use common and ordinary caution to be in the right.
Page 415 - ... it. It was possible for the defendant so to have constructed the guard, that such an accident as this could not have happened; and this, so far as appears, could have been done without unreasonable expense or trouble. If the defendant ought to have foreseen that such an accident might happen, of if such an accident could reasonably have been anticipated, the omission to provide against it would be actionable negligence.
Page 378 - No indictment is insufficient, nor can the trial, judgment, or other proceedings thereon be affected, by reason of a defect or imperfection in matter of form, which does not tend to the prejudice of the substantial rights of the defendant, upon the merits.
Page 79 - ... that business in the mind of the public the right to the mark or name is lost, despite the existence of purely subjective "intent...