Weekly Notes of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, the County Courts of Philadelphia, and the United States District and Circuit Courts for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Volume 29Kay & Brother, 1892 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 82
Page ii
... BROTHER , in the Office of the Librarian of Congress , at Washington . Nov. 1891 - May 1892 REPLACEMENT 12162 PHILADELPHIA : COLLINS PRINTING HOUSE , 705 Jayne Street . REPORTERS . Supreme Court . MR . HENRY C. OLMSTED.
... BROTHER , in the Office of the Librarian of Congress , at Washington . Nov. 1891 - May 1892 REPLACEMENT 12162 PHILADELPHIA : COLLINS PRINTING HOUSE , 705 Jayne Street . REPORTERS . Supreme Court . MR . HENRY C. OLMSTED.
Page iii
... assisted by Mr. Mark Wilks Collet . N. B. Admiralty Cases revised by MR . MORTON P. HENry . GENERAL EDITOR , MR . ALBERT A. OUTERBRIDGE , 608 Chestnut Street , Philadelphia . ( iii ) ERRATUM . SPROAT v . DIRECTORS OF POOR , p.
... assisted by Mr. Mark Wilks Collet . N. B. Admiralty Cases revised by MR . MORTON P. HENry . GENERAL EDITOR , MR . ALBERT A. OUTERBRIDGE , 608 Chestnut Street , Philadelphia . ( iii ) ERRATUM . SPROAT v . DIRECTORS OF POOR , p.
Page 71
... Street , New York . Frank Ruscher , John T. Mellor , Jr. It further appeared that Charles Finke & Co. were a firm in New York city , engaged in what is known as the " sampling " of leaf tobacco , with their main office in New York , and ...
... Street , New York . Frank Ruscher , John T. Mellor , Jr. It further appeared that Charles Finke & Co. were a firm in New York city , engaged in what is known as the " sampling " of leaf tobacco , with their main office in New York , and ...
Page 73
... Street , New York , " Frank Ruscher and John T. June 2 , 1890 , a reargument was ordered , and Mellor , Jr. , being a part of the company . Frank the case was reargued May 18 , 1891 , before a Ruscher was one of the gentlemen who was ...
... Street , New York , " Frank Ruscher and John T. June 2 , 1890 , a reargument was ordered , and Mellor , Jr. , being a part of the company . Frank the case was reargued May 18 , 1891 , before a Ruscher was one of the gentlemen who was ...
Page 74
... Street , New York . Frank would write into every such contract is a very Ruscher , John T. Mellor , Jr. " serious question , which we are not called upon to rule in this case . As it is one of the first im- pression , and at the same ...
... Street , New York . Frank would write into every such contract is a very Ruscher , John T. Mellor , Jr. " serious question , which we are not called upon to rule in this case . As it is one of the first im- pression , and at the same ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Act of April action affirmed agreement alleged Allegheny County amount Appeal appellee applied April 22 assignment of error assumpsit authority bank bill Burket charge Christopher Hope claim clause coal cologne Common Pleas Commonwealth contract corporation County Court of Equity creditors damages debt December 26 decree deed defendant defendant's duty entitled equity evidence execution executors fact fee simple fendant filed follows garnishee held husband injury intended inter alia interest John judgment jury label Lancaster County land lease liable license lien ment negligence opinion owner paid parties payment Pennsylvania person petition Phila Philadelphia County Pittsburgh plaintiff purchase purpose question Railroad real estate reason recover refused resulting trust road rule scire facias sell statute street suit testator testified testimony thereof tion trade-mark trial trust verdict WEEKLY NOTES wife William witness
Popular passages
Page 28 - The taking, receiving, reserving or charging a rate of interest greater than is allowed by the preceding section, when knowingly done, shall be deemed a forfeiture of the entire interest which the note, bill or other evidence of debt carries •with it, or which has been agreed to be paid thereon.
Page 368 - America, to them well and truly paid by the said party of the second part, at and before the ensealing and delivery of these presents, the receipt whereof is...
Page 219 - A married woman shall, in accordance with the provisions of this Act, be capable of acquiring, holding, and disposing by will or otherwise, of any real or personal property as her separate property, in the same manner as if she were a feme sole, without the intervention of any trustee.
Page 223 - ... to the residuary legatee or devisee, next of kin or heirs, according to law...
Page 230 - The decree is affirmed, and the appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.
Page 368 - ... party of the first part his heirs executors, administrators and assigns...
Page 69 - And be it further enacted, that every will shall be construed, with reference to the real estate and personal estate comprised in it, to speak and take effect as if it had been executed immediately before the death of the testator, unless a contrary intention shall appear by the will.
Page 26 - To exercise by its board of directors, or duly authorized officers or agents, subject to law, all such incidental powers as shall be necessary to carry on the business of banking; by discounting and negotiating promissory notes, drafts, bills of exchange, and other evidences of debt...
Page 261 - In witness whereof, we, the said parties of the first and. second parts, have hereunto set our hands and seals the day and year above written.
Page 248 - In determining what is proximate cause, the true rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the negligence ; such a consequence as, under the surrounding circumstances of the case, might and ought to have been seen by the wrongdoer as likely to flow from his act.