DECISIONS OF THE S COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS AND OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS IN PATENT AND TRADE-MARK AND COMPILED FROM VOLS. 342-353, INCLUSIVE, OF THE OFFICIAL CASES REPORTED [Decisions of the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia are indicated by the letter ("); of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals by the letter ("); and of the Supreme Court of the United States by the letter (*)] A Page • Adams & Sons Grocer Company. Booth Fisheries Company v_ American Gas Accumulator Co. v. Prest-O-Lite Co., Inc.. American Lakes Paper Company. Ex parte-- 195 252 79 American Steel Foundries v. Robertson, Commissioner of Patents, and 289 • American Tobacco Company, Inc., The, v. Gordon. Gordon v. The American Tobacco Company, Inc- 119 "Anderson. In re-. 241 • Anderson, administrator of the Estate of Percy L. Hill, deceased. In re----- 201 a Andrews v. Downs_. 152 Andrews Radio Company v. Timmons Radio Products Corporation__. C Aristo Hosiery Co., Inc., Scott & Williams, Inc., V_. 39 47 275. Arma Engineering Company. Sperry Gyroscope Company v. Armand Company, The, v. Marvin___. 316 73 Aspegren & Co., Inc. The Cracker Jack Co. v---. Benecke & Kropf Mfg. Co. (two cases). Stromberg Motor Devices Co. v. Benecke & Kropf Mfg. Co. v. Stromberg Motor Devices Co. a Booth Fisheries Company v. Adams & Sons Grocer Company Brewer & Company, Inc. Parke, Davis & Company v c Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. et al. Victor Talking Mach. Co. v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. et al v. Victor Talking Mach. Co., v- C Page California Cedar Products Company. The Duro Pump & Manufacturing Company v-. Cameron. Ex parte. 25, 129 6 " Campbell v. Gilpin___. 151 a Cantrell & Cochrane, Limited. Guggenheim v.. a Caron Corporation v. Henri Muraour & Cie---- a Carter & Sons, H. W. R. H. Macy & Company, Inc., v‒‒‒ 221 232 196 a Collins v. Lotz, Muhlfeld, and Caracristi. Muhlfeld and Caracristi v. 185 284 Danforth v. Levan et al. v. Lines v. Luetscher. Rose v. Dougherty v. a Davidson. In re- Davis-Bournonville Company. The Alexander Milburn Company v---a De Forest v. Hartley and White. White v. De Forest and Hartley....... Delpark, Incorporated. Luckett v----- Dougherty v. Keller v. Danforth v. Levan et al. v. Lines v. Luetscher. 65 212 303 131 307 65 16 152 98 98 25, 129 1 Dunham. Erickson v. Dunbar v. Duro Pump & Manufacturing Company, The, v. California Cedar Products Company. Durr. Ex parte- E Eastman Kodak Company v. The Kodel Manufacturing Co Edmiston. James Brothers v-_-_ Edmonds Shoe Co. v. Beck Hazzard, Inc. Ellis. Ex parte-- Erickson v. Dunbar v. Dunham_. F Fashion Wear Shirt Company. Franklin Knitting Mills, Inc., v_ • Federal Yeast Corporation v. Fleischmann Co--- c Feniger et al. Protex Signal Co. v-- c Fleischmann Co. Federal Yeast Corporation v_ c France Milling Co., Inc., v. Washburn-Crosby Co., Inc---- G Gene-Vall Cigar Co., Inc. Ex parte--- a Giesler v. Moulet. Moutlet v. Giesler_ a Gilpin. Campbell v --. Glick Company, The Max. Colby & McDermott v_ Gomery, Schwartz, O'Meara, et al. Concrete Appliance Company and Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, The. Ex parte---- Page 265 261 257 86 168, 169 4 31 64 181 151 70 284 225 42 a Gordon. The American Tobacco Company, Inc., v. Gordon v. The American Tobacco Company, Inc. 119 " Guggenheim v. Cantrell & Cochrane, Limited. a Guillemard. Lamb and Hoover v- • Gulliford v. Russ_-_ c Guthrie v. Curlett et al. 221 158 Gulden, Inc., Charles. Francis H. Leggett & Company v-- 61 183 278 H ✔ Harlem Card & Paper Company, Inc., v. Taylor-Logan Co----- 234 a Hartley and White. White v. De Forest and Hartley. De Forest v-a Hathaway. Ryon v‒‒‒‒ a Hay. Malone, doing business under the style and name of Poro College v‒‒‒‒‒ 126, 128 a H-O Cereal Company, Inc., The. Holland Food Corporation v------ 143, 144 a Ho-Ro-Co Manufacturing Company v. Malone, doing business under the style and name of Poro College. • Holland Food Corporation v. The H-O Cereal Company, Inc-- a Howard Co., R. S., v. Robertson, Commissioner of Patents, et al. Bald win Co. v. R. S. Howard Co- a Howe v. Clark and Hovey-. Humphrey. Ex parte_‒‒‒ Hunter v. Russell_ I 294, 306 243 * Independent Wireless Telegraph Company v. Radio Corporation of America____ • International Cork Co. v. New Process Cork Co--- |