Federal-state Water Rights: Hearings...88-2...March 10, 11, 12, and 13, 19641964 - 361 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 6
... question as to whether the use of water for power is or is not a " consumptive use " to which navigation is subordinated . This became an important issue in connection with Missouri River Basin projects a few years ago . Hearings ...
... question as to whether the use of water for power is or is not a " consumptive use " to which navigation is subordinated . This became an important issue in connection with Missouri River Basin projects a few years ago . Hearings ...
Page 8
... question of water rights , particularly to the people of the Western States . However , we do not recommend the enactment of this bill . Federal - State water rights has been the subject of legislative proposals for a number of ...
... question of water rights , particularly to the people of the Western States . However , we do not recommend the enactment of this bill . Federal - State water rights has been the subject of legislative proposals for a number of ...
Page 15
... question would , if it constitutionally can , submit Congress decisions and the exercise of executive discretion thereunder for confirmation , revision , and possible veto by State legislatures and State ad- ministrators . We think it ...
... question would , if it constitutionally can , submit Congress decisions and the exercise of executive discretion thereunder for confirmation , revision , and possible veto by State legislatures and State ad- ministrators . We think it ...
Page 20
... question have come before this committee . I support the power preference law , and this bill has nothing to do with that . I support the acreage limitation as a part of Federal reclamation law and this bill would not affect that ...
... question have come before this committee . I support the power preference law , and this bill has nothing to do with that . I support the acreage limitation as a part of Federal reclamation law and this bill would not affect that ...
Page 22
... question . It would not affect the public agency preference under Federal power marketing programs . It does not represent an attempt to cripple the Federal Government in the exercise of its powers under the Federal Constitution . I ...
... question . It would not affect the public agency preference under Federal power marketing programs . It does not represent an attempt to cripple the Federal Government in the exercise of its powers under the Federal Constitution . I ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
88th Congress acquire water rights agencies appropriation Association Attorney authority beneficial bill California Central Valley project Chairman claim clause Colorado River compensation Congress congressional Constitution consumptive County Department of Justice Desert Land Act District effect eminent domain enactment ENERSEN Federal Government Federal lands Federal Power Act Federal Power Commission Federal projects filed flood control GOLDBERG hearings Insular Affairs interest Interior and Insular inverse condemnation irrigation legislation license ment national forests navigation servitude nonnavigable paragraph present problem procedure property rights public lands purposes question Reclamation Act recognized record require reservation theory resolution riparian San Joaquin San Joaquin River Secretary Senator CHURCH Senator JORDAN Senator KUCHEL Senator Moss Stat statement statute streams subcommittee tion U.S. Senate U.S. Supreme Court unappropriated water United vested water law water projects water rights water rights board water users waters arising West withdrawal or reservation Wyoming