Federal-state Water Rights: Hearings...88-2...March 10, 11, 12, and 13, 19641964 - 361 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 72
Page 5
... appears that , except in the case of Indians , the primary intent of S. 1275 is to strip the United States of power to reserve water for future use . For some reason its proponents frown on the conservation of water . It appears to be ...
... appears that , except in the case of Indians , the primary intent of S. 1275 is to strip the United States of power to reserve water for future use . For some reason its proponents frown on the conservation of water . It appears to be ...
Page 6
... appears not to protect the public from the monopolization of water which would result from State - law appropriations . To protect the public and to carry out the purposes of section 10 of the Stock - Raising Homestead Act , the United ...
... appears not to protect the public from the monopolization of water which would result from State - law appropriations . To protect the public and to carry out the purposes of section 10 of the Stock - Raising Homestead Act , the United ...
Page 10
... appear to deprive the United States of any right to use water which it reserved by virtue of a withdrawal or reservation of public lands and which conflicts with any private rights acquired either be- fore or after the establishment of ...
... appear to deprive the United States of any right to use water which it reserved by virtue of a withdrawal or reservation of public lands and which conflicts with any private rights acquired either be- fore or after the establishment of ...
Page 31
... appears generally that the very limited number of persons raising objections against the bill have not read what this particular bill itself provides and / or they have a misapprehension as to what its effect would be . Therefore , it ...
... appears generally that the very limited number of persons raising objections against the bill have not read what this particular bill itself provides and / or they have a misapprehension as to what its effect would be . Therefore , it ...
Page 33
... appears to most people to be an unfair and unnecessary way for the Central Government to deal with its citi- zens or State and local governmental entities which have planned and invested in reliance on the continuance of a supply of ...
... appears to most people to be an unfair and unnecessary way for the Central Government to deal with its citi- zens or State and local governmental entities which have planned and invested in reliance on the continuance of a supply of ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
88th Congress acquire water rights agencies appropriation Association Attorney authority beneficial bill California Central Valley project Chairman claim clause Colorado River compensation Congress congressional Constitution consumptive County Department of Justice Desert Land Act District effect eminent domain enactment ENERSEN Federal Government Federal lands Federal Power Act Federal Power Commission Federal projects filed flood control GOLDBERG hearings Insular Affairs interest Interior and Insular inverse condemnation irrigation legislation license ment national forests navigation servitude nonnavigable paragraph present problem procedure property rights public lands purposes question Reclamation Act recognized record require reservation theory resolution riparian San Joaquin San Joaquin River Secretary Senator CHURCH Senator JORDAN Senator KUCHEL Senator Moss Stat statement statute streams subcommittee tion U.S. Senate U.S. Supreme Court unappropriated water United vested water law water projects water rights water rights board water users waters arising West withdrawal or reservation Wyoming