Page images
PDF
EPUB

.. 259

Co. V

Matlock et ux. v. Taylor,

576

0. Matlock v. Powell,

378 Maulsby v. Wolf,

457 O'Brian v. The State ex rel. Swift,. 469 May et al. v. Crawford,

5 O'Donald v. The Evansville, &c., RailMay et al. v. McCray,

88 road Co.,... Maynard y. The State,. 427 Ohaver, Miles v.....

206 McAllister, Parker v.. 12 O'Herrin v. The State,

420 McCorkle v. The State,

39 Ohio, &c., Railroad Co., Andrews v..... 169 McCoy, Hunter v...

528 Ohio, &c., Railroad Co., Vawter v...... 174 McCray, May et al. v. 88 O'Neal, Carpenter v.....

19 McCullough v. The State ex rel. Wilson, 391 Overman v. Forkner et al.,

294 McDaniel v. The Evansville, &c., Railroad Co.,..

464

P. McDaniel v. Weaver,

517 McFarland et al. v. Birdsall et al.,. 126 Parker v. McAllister,

12 McIntosh et al., Townsend et al. v...... 57 Parkinson, The Indianapolis, &c., RailMcLean, Laughery v.... 106 road Co. v....

541 McMahan, The Indianapolis, &c., Rail Parish et al. v. Heikes,

.194, 605 road Co. V.... 422 Paschal v. Smith et al.,

340 McNamara v. Ellis,. 516 Patterson et al., Walcott v..

248 McNeer et al. v. Dipboy, 18 Pavy et al. v. Ramsey,.

5 McTaggart et al. v. Rose, 230 Pearce, The State v..

426 Means, The Indianapolis, &c., Railroad Pearsoll v. The State,.

432 30 Perry, Brown v...

32 Medler v. Hiatt, . 405 Perry et al., Lyon et al. v.

515 Meikel et al. v. Cottrell et al. (three cases) 571 Peterson, The New Albany, &c., RailMeikel v. Harman, . 387 road Co. v...

112 Mercer, Butler et al. v.. 479 Pierce, The State v.

302 Meredith et al. v. Lackey,

529 Piper, Creighton et al. ex rel. Farras v.. 182 Merriweather, Hardy v..., 203 Port, Williams v..

569 Middleton v. Miller, 537 Potter et al. v. Fleming et al.,

486 Miles v. Ohaver, 206 Powell, Matlock v....

378 Miller et al., Dodd v. (eight cases), 433 Price, Martindalo et al. v... Miller et al., Helton et al. v.

577 Miller et al., Lambdin v..

514

Q. Miller et al. v. Blackburn,.

62 Miller et al. v. Keegan et al., 502 Quinn v. The State,

589 Miller, Middleton v...

537 Mills et al. v. Gould et al.,

278

R. Mills, Jones v..

436 Mitchell, Black v..

397 Rabourn et al., State ex rel. May v... 300 Mitchell, Cookerly v.....

471 Ramsey, Pavy et al. v... Mitchell et al. v. Dibble et al., 526 Randolph v. The State,

232 Moody et al., Young et al. v.. 571 Raney, Reasor et al. v.

441 Morrison, Long v. 595 Reasor et al. v. Raney,

441 Morrison v. The Eaton, &c., Railroad Reeves, Small v...

163 Co., 110 Reilley v. The State,.

217 Morris v. Stewart et al.,. 334 Reynolds et al. Benfield v..

388 Mosher v. The State, . 261 Reynolds, Hall v.

472 Murphy, Davis v.. 158 Reynolds, Veasey et al. v...

444 Mussleman, Wade v.. 362 Rhodes, Hall v..

241 Ridge et al. v. Sunman et al.,

540 N. Risinger, Wiseman v.

461 Roberts, Baker v.

552 Negley ct ux. v. Wilson, 215 Roberts, Cleveland v..

511 Nelson v. Hart, 448 Robinson v. Hadley,

417 New Albany, &c., Railroad Co. v. Peter Rodman, Sturgis et al. v...

604 son, 112 Rogers, Davis et al. v..

424 Newcastle, &c., Railroad Co., Thornburgh Rogers et al., Smith et al. v..

224 499 Roloson et al. v. Herr..

539 New, Gulick v........ 93 Rooker et al. v. Wise,

276 Norris, Little et al. v... 375 Rose, McTaggart et al. v...

230 Norton et al., Thompson v...

187 Round v. The State ex rel. Riley et al., . 493 Nudd v. Burnett,... 25 Roush, Sinclair v....

450 Nuttman, Daily et al. v... 339 | Rowland v. The State,.

575

115

5

V.

LIBRA

Rudisill, Glidewell v...

508 State, O'Herrin v... Rupel, Harris v..... 209 State, Pearsoll v..

432 State, Quinn v..

589 S. State, Randolph v.

232 State, Reilley v

217 Sage v. Matheny, ...

369 State, Rowland v. Sauvaine, The State v. 21 State, Swinney v.

315 Schlosser v. Fox,... 365 State, Ulmer v.

52 Schneider, Wright v. 527 State v. Adamson,.

296 Schoonover, Chandler v. 324 State v. Bowers,.

195 Scott et al. v. Dibble et al.,

17 State v.
Clevinger,

366 Scott et al. v. Hall et al., 136 State v. Conger,

396 Shaw, Keck v. 384 State v. Ellison,.

380 Sherman et al. v. Cameron et al., 418 State v. Ely,.....

291 Shireman v. Jackson,.. 459 State v. Farley et al.,

23 Shockley Ex Parte,. 413 State v. Gartrell,

280 Simmons, Barton et al. v. 49 State y. Horsey,

185 Sims et al., Lung et al. v..... 467 State v. Kalb,

403 Sinclair v. Roush,.. 450 State v. Kunbert,.

374 Sipe v. Sipe,... 477 State v. Lindley,

430 Small et al. v. Howland et al.,. 592 State v. Pearce,..

426 Small v. Reeves,. 163 State v. Pierce,.

302 Smith et al. v. Conlan,. 513 State v. Sauvaine,.

21 Smith et al. v. Doggett et al. (Six Cases), 442 State v. Snyder,..

429 Smith et al., Paschal v..... 340 State v. Warner,.

572 Smith et al. v. Rogers et al.,.. 224 State, Wheeler v.

573 Smith, Wolf et al. v.... ...... 360 Steamboat David Gibson, Coplinger v... 480 Snyder, The State v....

..... 429 Stebbens v. Lenfesty, Songer, Stevens v..... ..... 342 Stetson et al. v. Cleneay et al.,.

453 Spaugh et al. v. Huffer,. 305 Stevens v. Songer,...

342 Spears et ux. v. Featheringill,. 402 Stewart et al., Morris v...

334 Spencer et al., The City of Lafayette, Strange, Lomax et al. v.

21 &c., V.... 399 Studabaker, Greer v...

519 Spicely v. True,.. 437 Stump v. Hart et al.,

438 Stanley, The State ex rel. Parish Grove

Stump v. Toms et al.,

439 Township v. 409 Sturgis et al. v. Rodman,.

604 State, Baugh v 29 Sunman et al., Ridge et al. v.

540 State, Block v.... 425 Sweetser, Dodd v...

292 State, Bolle v. 376 Swinney v The State,

315 State, Carpenter v..

109 State, Clark v

26

T. State, Davis v.

358 State, Drapert v 123 Talbott et al., Kortpeter v....

391 State ex rel. May v. Rabourn et al., 300 Talbott et al. v. Armstrong et al, 254 State ex rel. Parish Grove Township v. Taylor, Matlock et ux, v...

576 Stanley,

409 Thatcher, Tibbetts v..... State ex rel. Riley et al., Round v..... 493 Thomas, Jones v.....

474 State ex rel. Swift, O'Brian v...... 469 Thompson v. Norton et al.,.

187 State ex rel. Wilson, McCullough v.... 391 Thornburgh v. The Newcastle, &c., RailState, Garrison v..... 287 road Co.,

499 State, Haworth v... 260 Thornton v. Williams,.

518 State, Hayworth v. 590 Tibbetts v. Thatcher,.

86 State, Igoe v......

239 Toledo, &c., Railroad Co. v. Hibbert,. 509 State, Jackson v... 327 Toms et al., Stump v...

438 State, Johnson et al. v.

574 Town of Williamsport, &c. v. Kent et State, Jones v.... 346 al.,...

306 State, Joy v

139 Townsend et al. v. McIntosh et al.,. 57 State, Keely v. 36 Traber et al., Mahon v.

525 State, Laupher v. 327 True, Spicely v.

437 State, Lofton v. 1 Tucker v. Makepeace,

186 State, Malone v.

219 State, Maynard v.

427

U. State, McCorkle v.

39 State, Mosher v. 261 Ulmer v. The State,...

52

86

85, 607

385

V.
Wilkins et al. v. Malone,..

153 Williams et al. v. Chase et al., .

253 Vail et al. v. Halton et al.,....

344 Williams et al. v. The Evansville, &c., Vail v. Heustis,..

Railroad Co. (eight cases), ...

428 Vance, Little et al. v..

19, 22 Williams, The Indianapolis, &c., RailVawter, The Ohio and Mississippi Rail road Co. v.

521 road Co. v. 174 Williams, Thornton v..

518 Veasoy et al. v. Reynolds, 444 Williams v. Jones et al.,

363 Venneman, French v... 282 Williams v. Port,

569 Vutrick, Johnson et al. v. 216 Wilson et al., Cones y..

465 Wilson, Lasselle v.......

520 W. Wilson, Negley et ux. V.

215

Wilson v. The Evansville, &c., Railroad Wade v. Museleman,

362 Co., Walcott v. Patterson et al.,. 248 Wilstach v. Hawkins,

541 Walker, The Cincinnati, &c., Railroad Wiseman v. Risinger,

461 Co. v. 364 Wise, Rooker et al. v.

276 Waller, Little et al, v. 447 Wolf et al. v. Smith,

360 Wall v. Whisler,... 228 Wolf, Maulsby v.

457 Warner, Darlington v. 449 Woodford v. Leavenworth,

311 Warner, The State v. 572 Worthington, Hanes v..

320 Weasner, The Board of Comm’rs, &c., v. 191 Wright v. Schneider,

527 Weatherman, Hays v.

341 Wynne et al., The Cincinnati, &c., RailWeaver, McDaniel y.. 517 road Co. v..

385 Weddle, Bales y....

349 Wheeler v. The State,

573

Y. Whisler, Wall v....

228 White v. Wiley, 496 Young et al., Lemen et al v..

3 Wiley, White v.... 496 Young et al. v. Moody et al.,

571 Wilkerson et al. v. Chada, 448) York v. Marshall,

250

[blocks in formation]

AT INDIANAPOLIS, NOVEMBER TERM, 1859, IN THE FORTY

FOURTH YEAR OF THE STATE.

LOFTON V. THE STATE.

APPEAL from the Washington Circuit Court.

Saturday,

December 24. Per Curiam.—Indictment against the appellant for the murder of one John Vogles. Trial, conviction of manslaughter, and judgment over a motion for a new trial.

On the calling of the cause for trial, the defendant filed an affidavit for a continuance. The affidavit seems to contain all the requirements of the law, and states, in substance, that he could not go to a trial at that term on account of the absence of one Margaret Ann Brown, who had, at the previous term, been duly recognized to appear as a witness at that term, but who, from sickness, was unable to attend; that he could prove by said Margaret the following facts: “That he was going peaceably along the public highway, without making any hostile demonstration whatever, when the deceased, John Vogles, commenced a violent assault upon him, and that the defendant told the

Vol. XIV.-1

[ocr errors]

Nov. Term, deceased, in a friendly manner, not to strike him, and affi. 1859.

ant receded from the deceased, and did not strike nor offer Chenoweth to strike him until after the deceased seized the affiant and Chenowita. commenced beating and kicking him with considerable

violence; that as soon as affiant could release himself, he desisted from defending himself and retreated; that it was during the time that he was so beaten, seized, and kicked as aforesaid by the deceased, that affiant struck the blow which is charged to have caused the death of the deceased, John Vogles.The affidavit states that the facts thus set out are true, and that he cannot prove them by any other witness whose testimony can be as readily procured, an that the affidavit was not made for delay merely, &c. The affidavit of the husband of the witness was also filed, showing her inability to attend on account of sickness.

We are of opinion that the facts thus set up were material to the defense of the accused, and, therefore, that the continuance should have been granted.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

C. L. Dunham, W. T. Otto, and H. Heffren, for the appellant.

CHENOWITH v. CHENOWITH.

If a feme covert obtains a divorce and alimony, she has no interest, as survivor,

in the estate of the husband.

Saturday,
December 24.

APPEAL from the Boone Circuit Court.

Hanna, J.— Application for divorce, which was granted on account of the misconduct of the husband. The custody of the offspring of the marriage, one child, was decreed to the wife, and 1,000 dollars alimony (allowed her), to be paid in installments, if security should be given; if not, execution to issue, &c.

It is insisted that the amount of alimony awarded is

« PreviousContinue »