...thing, being under the management of the Defendant, the accident is such as in the ordinary course does not happen if those who have the management use proper care, it afforded reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation, that the accident arose from want of care...

...thing, being under the management of the Defendant, the accident is such as in the ordinary course does not happen if those who have the management use proper care, it afforded reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation, that the accident arose from want of care...

...accident is such as in in that behalf that the same came and fell upon and against the ordinary course of things does not happen if those who have the management...defendant, that the accident arose from want of care. In an action against a dock Company for injury to the plaintiff by their alleged negligence the plaintiff...

...injury.—(Gray v. 1'ullen and Ilubhle, 34 LJ, QB 265.) NEGLIGENCE.—Where a machine is solely under charge of defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as, in the ordinary course of tilings, does not happen to those who have the charge of machinery and use proper care, it affords...

...management of the defendant or his servants and the accident is such that, as in the ordinary course of things, does not happen if those who have the management use the proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendant, that...

...the management of the defendant or his servant, and the accidents is such as in the ordinary course of things does not happen, if those who have the management...defendant, that the accident arose from want of care." Now, that was a case in which the negligence proved was that the plaintiff, who was an officer of the...

...own line ((?) ; in such ~~ cases it may be said that the accident is such as in the ordinary course does not happen if those who have the management use proper care, and therefore the mere happening of the accident affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation,...

...tho management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is euch »a iu the ordinary course of things does not happen if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, lu the absence of explanation by the defendants, that the accident arose from want of care, " — was...

...negligence; but where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, aud the accident is such as, in the ordinary course of...defendant, that the accident arose from want of care. This case is cited, with approbation, in Transportation Co. v. Downer, 11 Wall. 129. In Mullen v. St. John,...

...is entitled to recover damages. When a thing is shown to be under the management of the d«fendant or his servants, and the accident is such as in the ordinary count of things does not happen if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable...