Barker v. United States ..., r. Jackson ex dem. Henry.......... Catlett and Keith v. Pacific Insurance Company....... Gelston. Brewster v......... H. Hazard v.......... Hill, Griswold v.......... same case ... Hozie, United States v........ Huntington, Morris v. ... ... US 671 .300 .661 Mary, The ship......... sloop ....................... - Lucas v. ....... - v. Huntington .... Murray v. Lazarus.... . 188 209 .396 .348 .....572 .646 Nicoll, United States v. ..... ......... 149 ....252 ...594 Paper, Ninety-five bales of, v. United States......... ...... ... 64 ...457 ............ 64 ....... Rabaud v. D'Wolfe. .580 .........441 .620 .. 358 .290 ........453 Slocum o. Hathaway : ............ - same case ......... Society for Propagating the Gospel, People of Vermont Sprague, Jackson ex dem. Havens v... neren .486 652 iiii ....441 Tea, 651 chests of, v. United States ..... Page .......499 ..........305 United States v. Nine Packages of Linen.. - v. Mott ......... - v. Morris... v. Hatch ........ v. One Case of Hair Pencils v. Sturges v. Nicoll ..... v. . Van Ingen, Livingston v..... Vermont, People of, v. Society for Propagating the Gospel ..............652 .410 Ward v. Arredondo........ CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, NEW-YORK, APRIL TERM, 1810, AT NEW-YORK. (Hon. BROCKHOLST LIVINGSTON, Associate Justice of the SuBEFORE Hon. WILLIAM P. VAN NESS, District Judge. preme Court. The Collector having been clothed with a discretion, under the embargo laws, to grant permits to such foreign vessels as were allowed to depart with their cargoes, to take on hoard necessary sea stores and provisions ; the Court refused to decide, in a case where a permit had been granted, that the sea stores taken on board were more than were necessary, it not appearing that there was any fraud. And where it had been the practice at the custom-house, in such cases, to con sider arms and ammunition for the defence of the vessel as sea stores, the Court refused to adopt a different construction. LIVINGSTON, J. The libels in this cause state# That the brig Isabella being a British vessel, and in the port of New-York on the 1st of May, 1808, and being bound to a foreign port, had then and there notice of the act laying an embargo, and on the 5th of the same month, at the city of New-York, took on board certain goods, wares, and merchandises, to wit: six cannon, two gun-carriages, ten planks, an arm chest filled with small arms, thirteen casks of powder, six barrels of flour, three hundred cannon balls, other than the provisions and sea stores necessary for the said voyage. That she afterwards proceeded with the said goods, &c. |