Page images
PDF
EPUB
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[blocks in formation]

Barker v. United States ...,

r. Jackson ex dem. Henry..........
Baring o. Fanning................
Bank of the United States v. Magill.
Brown, United States v........
Brewster v. Gelston............
Backnor, Ruggles v............

[blocks in formation]

Catlett and Keith v. Pacific Insurance Company.......
Childs v. Corp.....................
Clark, United States v.....
Clement, Executors of, v. Dickey..
Cotton Planter, The ship......
Corp, Childs .......

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[blocks in formation]

Gelston. Brewster v.........
Goodyear o. Mathews....
Grand Turk, The ship........
Griswold v. Hill.......
same case .......

H.
Hatch, United States v.......
Hair Pencils, One case of, United States
Harnden, Denn es dem. Fisher v.......
Hathaway, Slocum v.......
Hazard v. Hazard...

Hazard v.......... Hill, Griswold v..........

same case ... Hozie, United States v........ Huntington, Morris v. ... ...

[blocks in formation]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[blocks in formation]

US

671

.300 .661

Mary, The ship.........

sloop .......................
Mathews, Goodyear 1.............
Magill, Bank of the United States o.
Mott, United States v. .......
Morris,

- Lucas v. .......

- v. Huntington .... Murray v. Lazarus....

. 188

209 .396

.348

.....572

.646

Nicoll, United States v. .....
Noah,

[merged small][ocr errors]

......... 149

....252

...594

Paper, Ninety-five bales of, v. United States.........
Parmele, United States v.....
Pacific Insurance Company, Catlett and Keith v.
Peters v. Prevost........
Porter, Jackson ex dem. Sparkman v........
Prevost, Peters v. ...

......

... 64

...457 ............ 64

.......

Rabaud v. D'Wolfe.
Redfield, Sullivan v. .........
Robert Fulton, The ship .......
Raggles . Bucknor ......,

.580 .........441

.620 .. 358

.290

........453

Slocum o. Hathaway : ............
Smith o. Jackson ex dem. Allyn.......

- same case ......... Society for Propagating the Gospel, People of Vermont Sprague, Jackson ex dem. Havens v...

neren
Storey, Adams v. ..
Sturges, United States v.......
Sullivan r. Redfield.

.486 652

[blocks in formation]

iiii

....441

Tea, 651 chests of, v. United States .....
Tillotson, United States v.....

Page .......499 ..........305

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

United States v. Nine Packages of Linen..

- v. Mott .........

- v. Morris...
- v. Parmele ...
- v. Williams .....
- v. Hoxie ........
- v. Tillotson .....

v. Hatch ........
- v. Noah.........

v. One Case of Hair Pencils
v. Lent ...
v. Brown....
v. Four Part Pieces of Woollen Cloth

v. Sturges
- v. Willard .......
- v. Clark ........

v. Nicoll .....
Ninety-five Bales of Paper v.......
Barker v......
651 Chests of Tea v....

[blocks in formation]

v. . Van Ingen, Livingston v..... Vermont, People of, v. Society for Propagating the Gospel ..............652

[ocr errors]

.410

Ward v. Arredondo........
William Gray, The brig........
Wilson v. Izard..................
Williams, United States v..........
Willard,
Woollen Cloth, Four Part Pieces of, United States v..

CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES,

NEW-YORK, APRIL TERM, 1810, AT NEW-YORK.

(Hon. BROCKHOLST LIVINGSTON, Associate Justice of the SuBEFORE

Hon. WILLIAM P. VAN NESS, District Judge.

preme Court.

[blocks in formation]

The Collector having been clothed with a discretion, under the embargo laws,

to grant permits to such foreign vessels as were allowed to depart with their cargoes, to take on hoard necessary sea stores and provisions ; the Court refused to decide, in a case where a permit had been granted, that the sea stores taken on board were more than were necessary, it not appearing that there

was any fraud. And where it had been the practice at the custom-house, in such cases, to con

sider arms and ammunition for the defence of the vessel as sea stores, the Court refused to adopt a different construction.

LIVINGSTON, J. The libels in this cause state# That the brig Isabella being a British vessel, and in the

port of New-York on the 1st of May, 1808, and being bound to a foreign port, had then and there notice of the act laying an embargo, and on the 5th of the same month, at the city of New-York, took on board certain goods, wares, and merchandises, to wit: six cannon, two gun-carriages, ten planks, an arm chest filled with small arms, thirteen casks of powder, six barrels of flour, three hundred cannon balls, other than the provisions and sea stores necessary for the said voyage.

That she afterwards proceeded with the said goods, &c.

« PreviousContinue »