Reports of Cases in Law and Equity in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Volume 56Gould, Banks & Gould, 1870 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 81
Page 11
... ground and another the defendant put the plaintiffs off , until the time of the commencement of the action . The cashier of the defendant gave evidence to show that the demands of the plaintiffs were not presented to him until about the ...
... ground and another the defendant put the plaintiffs off , until the time of the commencement of the action . The cashier of the defendant gave evidence to show that the demands of the plaintiffs were not presented to him until about the ...
Page 27
... ground of appeal to the county court was specified ; nor does it appear that any such question was raised before the county court ; and the whole case shows that the plaintiffs were treated , through the whole trial , as commissioners ...
... ground of appeal to the county court was specified ; nor does it appear that any such question was raised before the county court ; and the whole case shows that the plaintiffs were treated , through the whole trial , as commissioners ...
Page 29
... before the justice , either while the trial was progressing , or on the motion that was made for a nonsuit . And no such ground of ap- Dillayev . New York Central Railroad Company . peal to ONONDAGA - APRIL , 1865 . 29.
... before the justice , either while the trial was progressing , or on the motion that was made for a nonsuit . And no such ground of ap- Dillayev . New York Central Railroad Company . peal to ONONDAGA - APRIL , 1865 . 29.
Page 30
... ground . I think the judgment of the county court should be affirmed . [ ONONDAGA GENERAL TERM , April 4 , 1865. Mullin , Morgan , Bacon and Foster , Justices . ] 56 30 13h 592 DILLAYE vs. THE NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY . A train ...
... ground . I think the judgment of the county court should be affirmed . [ ONONDAGA GENERAL TERM , April 4 , 1865. Mullin , Morgan , Bacon and Foster , Justices . ] 56 30 13h 592 DILLAYE vs. THE NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY . A train ...
Page 34
... ground that there was not sufficient evidence to sustain the action , and that the evidence on the part of the plaintiff showed that negligence on his part contributed to the in- jury . The court stated that it was unnecessary to ...
... ground that there was not sufficient evidence to sustain the action , and that the evidence on the part of the plaintiff showed that negligence on his part contributed to the in- jury . The court stated that it was unnecessary to ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirmed aforesaid agent agreement alleged amount appear apply assessment assignment Aukin authority Barb bill bill of lading cause charge claim commissioners common law complaint consignee contract counsel county court court of equity coverture damages debt deceased deed defendant defendant's delivered dower Dunshee Dupasseur duty entitled equity evidence executed executor fact favor fendant Fraser George Harrison guardian heirs held Howlett husband injury intended interest intestacy Jefferson County John judge judgment jury justice Lahens land laudanum liable Maseras ment Morgan mortgage Mullady Mullin N. Y. Rep negligence ONONDAGA GENERAL TERM owner paid party payment person plaintiff premises principle purchase question Railroad Company receipt received recover referee refused rule Smith sold statute sustained Syracuse taken taxes testator testimony thereof tion trial trust usurious Utica verdict void wife witness York York Central Railroad