The Pacific Reporter, Volume 8West Publishing Company, 1886 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 7
Page v
507 || Lake Pleasanton Water Co. v. Contra Heinlen v. Fresno Canal & Irriga-
Costa Water Co. (Cal.)... . . . . . . . . . 501 tion Co. (Cal.).................... 513 Lamborn,
Denver & N. O. R. Co. v. Heiple v. City of East Portland (Or.) 907 | (Colo.).
507 || Lake Pleasanton Water Co. v. Contra Heinlen v. Fresno Canal & Irriga-
Costa Water Co. (Cal.)... . . . . . . . . . 501 tion Co. (Cal.).................... 513 Lamborn,
Denver & N. O. R. Co. v. Heiple v. City of East Portland (Or.) 907 | (Colo.).
Page 71
tion, if it was voidable; for, by the same section of the Code, “any absent or other
stockholder” is authorized to institute such a proceeding. Therefore, as a
stockholder of the corporation, the petitioner had legal capacity to institute the ...
tion, if it was voidable; for, by the same section of the Code, “any absent or other
stockholder” is authorized to institute such a proceeding. Therefore, as a
stockholder of the corporation, the petitioner had legal capacity to institute the ...
Page 279
tion, or judgment of a court or justice for a term exceeding one year.” If the
testimony did not warrant the judgment that was rendered by the court against the
petitioner, he should have prosecuted a proceeding in error instead of in habeas
...
tion, or judgment of a court or justice for a term exceeding one year.” If the
testimony did not warrant the judgment that was rendered by the court against the
petitioner, he should have prosecuted a proceeding in error instead of in habeas
...
Page 296
tion for the period of three years and six months, and to pay a fine to the United
States of $500. From the order overruling the motion for a new trial, and from the
final judgment, the appeal is taken to this court. The first assignment of error
refers ...
tion for the period of three years and six months, and to pay a fine to the United
States of $500. From the order overruling the motion for a new trial, and from the
final judgment, the appeal is taken to this court. The first assignment of error
refers ...
Page 315
Respondent claims the appeal should be dismissed, because notice of intention
to move for a new trial was not filed in time, under sec tion 659, Code Civil Proc.
Twelve days had elapsed from that on which the decision in the case was made,
...
Respondent claims the appeal should be dismissed, because notice of intention
to move for a new trial was not filed in time, under sec tion 659, Code Civil Proc.
Twelve days had elapsed from that on which the decision in the case was made,
...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
affidavit affirmed agent alleged amount answer Appeal from superior assignment Atchison county attorney authority Blue Rapids bond cause of action charge claim Code commenced complaint concur constitution contract conveyance corporation counsel creditors damages debt deed defendant's demurrer district court election entitled evidence execution fact favor fence fendant Filed November fraud garnishee Harper county held injury instruction intoxicating issued judgment and order jury Kansas Kansas Pacific Railway land legislature liable Marion county ment mortgage motion N. W. Rep negligence notice objection Osage county owner paid party payment person petition plaintiff in error possession premises proceedings promissory note prosecution purchase question railroad company reason recover respondent reversed road sheriff statute of limitations sufficient superior court supreme court sustained testified testimony thereof tion Topeka township trial verdict void witness