The Pacific Reporter, Volume 8West Publishing Company, 1886 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 3
A demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and, plaintiffs declining to amend,
final judgment was rendered in favor of defendant for $100 counsel fees, as
provided by section 7 of an act concerning actions for libel and slander, approved
...
A demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and, plaintiffs declining to amend,
final judgment was rendered in favor of defendant for $100 counsel fees, as
provided by section 7 of an act concerning actions for libel and slander, approved
...
Page 4
Would proof that they were so informed, and that they thus believed, be sufficient
to sustain an action? ... of stating them, and therefore that it can be reached by a
general demurrer, and that for this reason the demurrer was properly sustained.
Would proof that they were so informed, and that they thus believed, be sufficient
to sustain an action? ... of stating them, and therefore that it can be reached by a
general demurrer, and that for this reason the demurrer was properly sustained.
Page 19
It is further urged that, conceding the validity of the verdict to the extent of $1,575,
it cannot be sustained as to the residue. The complaint claimed that $200 was
paid by plaintiff on account of the purchase price of the wheat, and that he
incurred ...
It is further urged that, conceding the validity of the verdict to the extent of $1,575,
it cannot be sustained as to the residue. The complaint claimed that $200 was
paid by plaintiff on account of the purchase price of the wheat, and that he
incurred ...
Page 30
The court rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff, as against defendant and the
intervenors. The latter have not appealed. - The first point made by appellant is
that the fifth finding is not sustained by the evidence, and is against the evidence.
The court rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff, as against defendant and the
intervenors. The latter have not appealed. - The first point made by appellant is
that the fifth finding is not sustained by the evidence, and is against the evidence.
Page 37
The demurrer to the complaint was properly sustained, and the judgment should
be affirmed. We concur: SEARLs, C.; BELCHER, C. C. BY THE CourT. For the
reasons given in the foregoing opinion the judgment is affirmed. (2 Cal. Unrep.
The demurrer to the complaint was properly sustained, and the judgment should
be affirmed. We concur: SEARLs, C.; BELCHER, C. C. BY THE CourT. For the
reasons given in the foregoing opinion the judgment is affirmed. (2 Cal. Unrep.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirmed agent alleged allowed amount answer appeal application assignment attachment attorney authority bond cause charge claim Code complaint concur consideration constitute construction contract corporation court damages deed defendant denied district court duty effect election entered entitled error evidence execution fact favor filed follows further give given ground held injury instruction intent interest issued judgment jury Kansas land limitations ment mortgage motion N. W. Rep necessary negligence notice objection offered opinion Osage county owner paid party payment person petition plaintiff possession present proceedings proper prove purchase question railroad company reason received record recover referred refused rendered respondent reversed road rule statute sufficient sustained taken term testimony thereof tion trial verdict witness
Bibliographic information
| Title | The Pacific Reporter, Volume 8 National reporter system: State series The Pacific Reporter, California. Superior Courts |
| Contributors | California. Supreme Court, Colorado. Supreme Court, Kansas. Supreme Court, Oregon. Supreme Court, Nevada. Supreme Court, Idaho. Supreme Court, Montana. Supreme Court, Washington Territory. Supreme Court, Washington (State). Supreme Court, Wyoming. Supreme Court, Utah. Supreme Court, West Publishing Company, New Mexico. Supreme Court, Oklahoma. Supreme Court, Colorado. Court of Appeals, Kansas. Court of Appeals, Oklahoma. Criminal Court of Appeals, California. District Courts of Appeal |
| Publisher | West Publishing Company, 1886 |
| Original from | University of Minnesota |
| Digitized | 14 Jul 2014 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |