The Pacific Reporter, Volume 8West Publishing Company, 1886 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 8
C. McCloskey and E. V. Spencer, for respondent. Foot'E, C. An appeal from an
order refusing the defendant a new trial. The respondent objects to the
consideration by this court of the statement on that motion which is incorporated
in the ...
C. McCloskey and E. V. Spencer, for respondent. Foot'E, C. An appeal from an
order refusing the defendant a new trial. The respondent objects to the
consideration by this court of the statement on that motion which is incorporated
in the ...
Page 23
Street & Street and E. A. Rodgers, for respondent. SEARLs, C. Ejectment to
recover a mining claim. Plaintiff had judgment. Plaintiff is a corporation. In 1877
the demanded property was assessed for the purpose of taxation to the Boston
Tunnel ...
Street & Street and E. A. Rodgers, for respondent. SEARLs, C. Ejectment to
recover a mining claim. Plaintiff had judgment. Plaintiff is a corporation. In 1877
the demanded property was assessed for the purpose of taxation to the Boston
Tunnel ...
Page 27
FINDINGS-EVIDENCE. Findings held unsustained by the evidence.
Commissioners' decision. Department 2. Appeal from superior court, Stanislaus
county. Schell & Bond, for appellant. Wright & Hazen, for respondent. Foot'E, C. A
contest for ...
FINDINGS-EVIDENCE. Findings held unsustained by the evidence.
Commissioners' decision. Department 2. Appeal from superior court, Stanislaus
county. Schell & Bond, for appellant. Wright & Hazen, for respondent. Foot'E, C. A
contest for ...
Page 39
L. S. Taylor, for respondent. S. F. Geil and D. E. Alexander, for appellant. Foot'E,
C. The only matter disclosed by the record here which this court should consider
is the appeal from an order of the court below refusing to set aside and vacate a ...
L. S. Taylor, for respondent. S. F. Geil and D. E. Alexander, for appellant. Foot'E,
C. The only matter disclosed by the record here which this court should consider
is the appeal from an order of the court below refusing to set aside and vacate a ...
Page 48
It was rendered upon motion of the plaintiff, and, as said by counsel for
respondent, "as matter of law there followed a judgment in favor of Kirman in this
particular case for costs.” The judgment was, by the express terms of the statute,
not upon ...
It was rendered upon motion of the plaintiff, and, as said by counsel for
respondent, "as matter of law there followed a judgment in favor of Kirman in this
particular case for costs.” The judgment was, by the express terms of the statute,
not upon ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
affidavit affirmed agent alleged amount answer Appeal from superior assignment Atchison county attorney authority Blue Rapids bond cause of action charge claim Code commenced complaint concur constitution contract conveyance corporation counsel creditors damages debt deed defendant's demurrer district court election entitled evidence execution fact favor fence fendant Filed November fraud garnishee Harper county held injury instruction intoxicating issued judgment and order jury Kansas Kansas Pacific Railway land legislature liable Marion county ment mortgage motion N. W. Rep negligence notice objection Osage county owner paid party payment person petition plaintiff in error possession premises proceedings promissory note prosecution purchase question railroad company reason recover respondent reversed road sheriff statute of limitations sufficient superior court supreme court sustained testified testimony thereof tion Topeka township trial verdict void witness
Bibliographic information
| Title | The Pacific Reporter, Volume 8 National reporter system: State series The Pacific Reporter, California. Superior Courts |
| Contributors | California. Supreme Court, Colorado. Supreme Court, Kansas. Supreme Court, Oregon. Supreme Court, Nevada. Supreme Court, Idaho. Supreme Court, Montana. Supreme Court, Washington Territory. Supreme Court, Washington (State). Supreme Court, Wyoming. Supreme Court, Utah. Supreme Court, West Publishing Company, New Mexico. Supreme Court, Oklahoma. Supreme Court, Colorado. Court of Appeals, Kansas. Court of Appeals, Oklahoma. Criminal Court of Appeals, California. District Courts of Appeal |
| Publisher | West Publishing Company, 1886 |
| Original from | University of Minnesota |
| Digitized | 14 Jul 2014 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |