The Pacific Reporter, Volume 8West Publishing Company, 1886 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 2
FORCIBLE DETAINER—IEASE AS EVIDENCE IN. In an action for forcible
detainer, brought by a lessee, his lease is admissible in evidence, in connection
with his former possession, to show the extent of his possession and his right
thereto.
FORCIBLE DETAINER—IEASE AS EVIDENCE IN. In an action for forcible
detainer, brought by a lessee, his lease is admissible in evidence, in connection
with his former possession, to show the extent of his possession and his right
thereto.
Page 18
What is meant by the excess of the value of the property to the buyer is defined by
section 3354, Civil Code, as follows: “The value of property to a buyer, or owner
thereof, deprived of its possession, is deemed to be the price at which he might ...
What is meant by the excess of the value of the property to the buyer is defined by
section 3354, Civil Code, as follows: “The value of property to a buyer, or owner
thereof, deprived of its possession, is deemed to be the price at which he might ...
Page 22
the property in question, and their pursuits, to have given them a reasonable
opportunity to become acquainted with the nature and kind of land in dispute; but
it does not follow, and their testimony does not show them to possess any such ...
the property in question, and their pursuits, to have given them a reasonable
opportunity to become acquainted with the nature and kind of land in dispute; but
it does not follow, and their testimony does not show them to possess any such ...
Page 23
... not having been paid, the mining claim was sold on the second day of March,
1878, by the tax collector, to John Reister, who received a certificate of sale, and,
in due time, a tax deed of the premises, under which he entered into possession.
... not having been paid, the mining claim was sold on the second day of March,
1878, by the tax collector, to John Reister, who received a certificate of sale, and,
in due time, a tax deed of the premises, under which he entered into possession.
Page 25
The witness was called to prove possession of the demanded premises by
defendants, the amount of money expended thereon by plaintiff, and other acts
tending to show its prior possession. The facts of his being a stockholder and
secretary ...
The witness was called to prove possession of the demanded premises by
defendants, the amount of money expended thereon by plaintiff, and other acts
tending to show its prior possession. The facts of his being a stockholder and
secretary ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
affidavit affirmed agent alleged amount answer Appeal from superior assignment Atchison county attorney authority Blue Rapids bond cause of action charge claim Code commenced complaint concur constitution contract conveyance corporation counsel creditors damages debt deed defendant's demurrer district court election entitled evidence execution fact favor fence fendant Filed November fraud garnishee Harper county held injury instruction intoxicating issued judgment and order jury Kansas Kansas Pacific Railway land legislature liable Marion county ment mortgage motion N. W. Rep negligence notice objection Osage county owner paid party payment person petition plaintiff in error possession premises proceedings promissory note prosecution purchase question railroad company reason recover respondent reversed road sheriff statute of limitations sufficient superior court supreme court sustained testified testimony thereof tion Topeka township trial verdict void witness