The Pacific Reporter, Volume 8West Publishing Company, 1886 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 2
There was no error in admitting in evidence the lease to plaintiff. It was
admissible, in connection with plaintiff's former possession, to show the extent of
such possession. In an action for a forcible detainer, the plaintiff is entitled to
recover on ...
There was no error in admitting in evidence the lease to plaintiff. It was
admissible, in connection with plaintiff's former possession, to show the extent of
such possession. In an action for a forcible detainer, the plaintiff is entitled to
recover on ...
Page 20
The evidence tended to show that this sum was necessarily expended by plaintiff
in preparing the wheat not delivered for ... Again, the testimony might have been
objected to at the trial, and ruled out, or a refusal so to do assigned as error.
The evidence tended to show that this sum was necessarily expended by plaintiff
in preparing the wheat not delivered for ... Again, the testimony might have been
objected to at the trial, and ruled out, or a refusal so to do assigned as error.
Page 103
Filed October 9, 1885. REIHEARING—MOTION DENIED. Motion for rehearing. -
J. G. Mohler, for plaintiff in error. Garver & Bond, for defendant in error. PER
CURIAM. The opinion in this case was filed at the last February session of this
court.
Filed October 9, 1885. REIHEARING—MOTION DENIED. Motion for rehearing. -
J. G. Mohler, for plaintiff in error. Garver & Bond, for defendant in error. PER
CURIAM. The opinion in this case was filed at the last February session of this
court.
Page 104
The one made was subsequent to the rendition of the judgment, which was then
excepted to, and is not sufficient to preclude the plaintiff in error from having the
case reviewed here. The motion will be denied. (34 Kan. 254) WESTERN NEws ...
The one made was subsequent to the rendition of the judgment, which was then
excepted to, and is not sufficient to preclude the plaintiff in error from having the
case reviewed here. The motion will be denied. (34 Kan. 254) WESTERN NEws ...
Page 107
The plaintiff excepted to the instructions, and each of them. The jury returned a
verdict in favor of the plaintiff, assessing his damages at the sum of $15. Of this
judgment the plaintiff complains, assigning error in the giving of the instructions.
The plaintiff excepted to the instructions, and each of them. The jury returned a
verdict in favor of the plaintiff, assessing his damages at the sum of $15. Of this
judgment the plaintiff complains, assigning error in the giving of the instructions.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
affidavit affirmed agent alleged amount answer Appeal from superior assignment Atchison county attorney authority Blue Rapids bond cause of action charge claim Code commenced complaint concur constitution contract conveyance corporation counsel creditors damages debt deed defendant's demurrer district court election entitled evidence execution fact favor fence fendant Filed November fraud garnishee Harper county held injury instruction intoxicating issued judgment and order jury Kansas Kansas Pacific Railway land legislature liable Marion county ment mortgage motion N. W. Rep negligence notice objection Osage county owner paid party payment person petition plaintiff in error possession premises proceedings promissory note prosecution purchase question railroad company reason recover respondent reversed road sheriff statute of limitations sufficient superior court supreme court sustained testified testimony thereof tion Topeka township trial verdict void witness
Bibliographic information
| Title | The Pacific Reporter, Volume 8 National reporter system: State series The Pacific Reporter, California. Superior Courts |
| Contributors | California. Supreme Court, Colorado. Supreme Court, Kansas. Supreme Court, Oregon. Supreme Court, Nevada. Supreme Court, Idaho. Supreme Court, Montana. Supreme Court, Washington Territory. Supreme Court, Washington (State). Supreme Court, Wyoming. Supreme Court, Utah. Supreme Court, West Publishing Company, New Mexico. Supreme Court, Oklahoma. Supreme Court, Colorado. Court of Appeals, Kansas. Court of Appeals, Oklahoma. Criminal Court of Appeals, California. District Courts of Appeal |
| Publisher | West Publishing Company, 1886 |
| Original from | University of Minnesota |
| Digitized | 14 Jul 2014 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |