The Pacific Reporter, Volume 8West Publishing Company, 1886 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 14
... lines were so run upon the ground as to include that greater area. 2.
ADJOINING LAND-OWNERs—DIVISION FENCE–ESTOPPEL. Adjoining land-
owners who erect a division fence along their supposed boundary line, under an
agreement ...
... lines were so run upon the ground as to include that greater area. 2.
ADJOINING LAND-OWNERs—DIVISION FENCE–ESTOPPEL. Adjoining land-
owners who erect a division fence along their supposed boundary line, under an
agreement ...
Page 15
... the court was justified in saying that the north line of section 7 was only 40 and
not 43 chains north of its center. . Upon the questions of prescription and
estoppel, it is claimed for the appellant that the fences were built by the owners of
the ...
... the court was justified in saying that the north line of section 7 was only 40 and
not 43 chains north of its center. . Upon the questions of prescription and
estoppel, it is claimed for the appellant that the fences were built by the owners of
the ...
Page 16
Brown, that “where owners of adjacent parcels of land have occupied, adversely
to each other for more than five years, their respective tracks by a division line,
which each has recognized and acquiesced in as the true line during all of that ...
Brown, that “where owners of adjacent parcels of land have occupied, adversely
to each other for more than five years, their respective tracks by a division line,
which each has recognized and acquiesced in as the true line during all of that ...
Page 31
Here the ditch, and the water which it conveyed, were not the property of the
owners ... ordinarily pass with a conveyance of the mill, but, in order to do so, it
must belong to the mill,—must be the property of the owner thereof, and not of
another.
Here the ditch, and the water which it conveyed, were not the property of the
owners ... ordinarily pass with a conveyance of the mill, but, in order to do so, it
must belong to the mill,—must be the property of the owner thereof, and not of
another.
Page 49
The answer admits that Jose R. Arguello was in his life-time, and up to the
fourteenth day of September, 1876, the owner in fee of the premises, but alleges
that on that day he sold and conveyed said premises to the defendant for the ...
The answer admits that Jose R. Arguello was in his life-time, and up to the
fourteenth day of September, 1876, the owner in fee of the premises, but alleges
that on that day he sold and conveyed said premises to the defendant for the ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
affidavit affirmed agent alleged amount answer Appeal from superior assignment Atchison county attorney authority Blue Rapids bond cause of action charge claim Code commenced complaint concur constitution contract conveyance corporation counsel creditors damages debt deed defendant's demurrer district court election entitled evidence execution fact favor fence fendant Filed November fraud garnishee Harper county held injury instruction intoxicating issued judgment and order jury Kansas Kansas Pacific Railway land legislature liable Marion county ment mortgage motion N. W. Rep negligence notice objection Osage county owner paid party payment person petition plaintiff in error possession premises proceedings promissory note prosecution purchase question railroad company reason recover respondent reversed road sheriff statute of limitations sufficient superior court supreme court sustained testified testimony thereof tion Topeka township trial verdict void witness
Bibliographic information
| Title | The Pacific Reporter, Volume 8 National reporter system: State series The Pacific Reporter, California. Superior Courts |
| Contributors | California. Supreme Court, Colorado. Supreme Court, Kansas. Supreme Court, Oregon. Supreme Court, Nevada. Supreme Court, Idaho. Supreme Court, Montana. Supreme Court, Washington Territory. Supreme Court, Washington (State). Supreme Court, Wyoming. Supreme Court, Utah. Supreme Court, West Publishing Company, New Mexico. Supreme Court, Oklahoma. Supreme Court, Colorado. Court of Appeals, Kansas. Court of Appeals, Oklahoma. Criminal Court of Appeals, California. District Courts of Appeal |
| Publisher | West Publishing Company, 1886 |
| Original from | University of Minnesota |
| Digitized | 14 Jul 2014 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |