The Pacific Reporter, Volume 8West Publishing Company, 1886 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 89
Page 135
He creates no trust; he commits no negligence whereby the confidence of
another can be betrayed. He is in no default, having the right of self-defense, in
preferring his own life and safety to the chances of pecuniary injury to others, and
his ...
He creates no trust; he commits no negligence whereby the confidence of
another can be betrayed. He is in no default, having the right of self-defense, in
preferring his own life and safety to the chances of pecuniary injury to others, and
his ...
Page 146
DAVIS. Filed October 9, 1885. RAILROAD COMPANY — LIABILITY FOR
NEGLIGENCE OF MEN OPERATING LOCAL ROAD MANAGED BY THROUGH
LINE. Where a great railroad company, operating a long line of road in the state,
projects, ...
DAVIS. Filed October 9, 1885. RAILROAD COMPANY — LIABILITY FOR
NEGLIGENCE OF MEN OPERATING LOCAL ROAD MANAGED BY THROUGH
LINE. Where a great railroad company, operating a long line of road in the state,
projects, ...
Page 147
and further alleged that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. Trial had at
the June term of court for 1884. The court, among other things, charged the jury
as follows: “It is incumbent upon the plaintiff to prove that the injury complained of
...
and further alleged that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. Trial had at
the June term of court for 1884. The court, among other things, charged the jury
as follows: “It is incumbent upon the plaintiff to prove that the injury complained of
...
Page 150
But if the defendant in fact exercised the actual control of the men in the
management and operation of the train, it would be liable for the negligence of
the men in the operation of the same, notwithstanding the men Were at the time
the ...
But if the defendant in fact exercised the actual control of the men in the
management and operation of the train, it would be liable for the negligence of
the men in the operation of the same, notwithstanding the men Were at the time
the ...
Page 161
... which bear, more or less, upon each of the several items of the account.
Respondent was the foreman of appellant's mine for several years. He was
regularly. 1 See note at end of case. v.8P, no.3—11 1. WHAT AMoUNTs To
NEGLIGENCE.
... which bear, more or less, upon each of the several items of the account.
Respondent was the foreman of appellant's mine for several years. He was
regularly. 1 See note at end of case. v.8P, no.3—11 1. WHAT AMoUNTs To
NEGLIGENCE.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirmed agent alleged allowed amount answer appeal application assignment attachment attorney authority bond cause charge claim Code complaint concur consideration constitute construction contract corporation court damages deed defendant denied district court duty effect election entered entitled error evidence execution fact favor filed follows further give given ground held injury instruction intent interest issued judgment jury Kansas land limitations ment mortgage motion N. W. Rep necessary negligence notice objection offered opinion Osage county owner paid party payment person petition plaintiff possession present proceedings proper prove purchase question railroad company reason received record recover referred refused rendered respondent reversed road rule statute sufficient sustained taken term testimony thereof tion trial verdict witness