The Pacific Reporter, Volume 8West Publishing Company, 1886 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 19
There was nothing voluntary about it, and plaintiff was not entitled, before suit
brought, to recover it back from the warehouseman, and the contract having been
broken by defendant, he became liable for this sum paid on account thereof.
There was nothing voluntary about it, and plaintiff was not entitled, before suit
brought, to recover it back from the warehouseman, and the contract having been
broken by defendant, he became liable for this sum paid on account thereof.
Page 59
Where a corporate officer gives a bond for the due performance of his duties
during his term of office for one year, the sureties on such bond are not liable for
a defalcation occurring after such term of office has expired, as the bond expires
with ...
Where a corporate officer gives a bond for the due performance of his duties
during his term of office for one year, the sureties on such bond are not liable for
a defalcation occurring after such term of office has expired, as the bond expires
with ...
Page 60
... have become liable, and are bound to pay, to said plaintiff the said sum of
$4,500.60, with interest from the first of May, ... on the ground that the same
shows the defendants are not liable on the bond for any part of the moneys
mentioned in ...
... have become liable, and are bound to pay, to said plaintiff the said sum of
$4,500.60, with interest from the first of May, ... on the ground that the same
shows the defendants are not liable on the bond for any part of the moneys
mentioned in ...
Page 62
It may be doubted whether the plaintiff could render the defendants liable on the
bond for any period by merely omitting to name a successor. But here, his term
having expired, the directors reappointed Allen. The bond in suit does not
provide ...
It may be doubted whether the plaintiff could render the defendants liable on the
bond for any period by merely omitting to name a successor. But here, his term
having expired, the directors reappointed Allen. The bond in suit does not
provide ...
Page 63
A principal in a bond is no further bound than his sureties. Bigelow v. Bridge, 8
Mass. 274. Appellant's counsel suggests: “Suppose a principal forged the name
of a surety: the surety would not be liable, but the principal would be.” In that case
...
A principal in a bond is no further bound than his sureties. Bigelow v. Bridge, 8
Mass. 274. Appellant's counsel suggests: “Suppose a principal forged the name
of a surety: the surety would not be liable, but the principal would be.” In that case
...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirmed agent alleged allowed amount answer appeal application assignment attachment attorney authority bond cause charge claim Code complaint concur consideration constitute construction contract corporation court damages deed defendant denied district court duty effect election entered entitled error evidence execution fact favor filed follows further give given ground held injury instruction intent interest issued judgment jury Kansas land limitations ment mortgage motion N. W. Rep necessary negligence notice objection offered opinion Osage county owner paid party payment person petition plaintiff possession present proceedings proper prove purchase question railroad company reason received record recover referred refused rendered respondent reversed road rule statute sufficient sustained taken term testimony thereof tion trial verdict witness
Bibliographic information
| Title | The Pacific Reporter, Volume 8 National reporter system: State series The Pacific Reporter, California. Superior Courts |
| Contributors | California. Supreme Court, Colorado. Supreme Court, Kansas. Supreme Court, Oregon. Supreme Court, Nevada. Supreme Court, Idaho. Supreme Court, Montana. Supreme Court, Washington Territory. Supreme Court, Washington (State). Supreme Court, Wyoming. Supreme Court, Utah. Supreme Court, West Publishing Company, New Mexico. Supreme Court, Oklahoma. Supreme Court, Colorado. Court of Appeals, Kansas. Court of Appeals, Oklahoma. Criminal Court of Appeals, California. District Courts of Appeal |
| Publisher | West Publishing Company, 1886 |
| Original from | University of Minnesota |
| Digitized | 14 Jul 2014 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |