The Pacific Reporter, Volume 8West Publishing Company, 1886 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 2
The record shows no error, and the judgment and order should be affirmed. We
concur: SEARLs, C.; BELCHER, C. C. BY THE CourT. For the reasons given in
the foregoing opinion the judgment and order are affirmed. (67 Cal. 451)
MURPHY ...
The record shows no error, and the judgment and order should be affirmed. We
concur: SEARLs, C.; BELCHER, C. C. BY THE CourT. For the reasons given in
the foregoing opinion the judgment and order are affirmed. (67 Cal. 451)
MURPHY ...
Page 3
Judgment and order affirmed. We concur: MYRICK, J.; MoRRISON, C. J. (2 Cal.
Unrep. 532) McKINNEY v. Roberts. (No. 9,342.)" Filed September 23, 1885. 1.
COMPLAINT IN SLANDER—ALLEGATIONS ON INFORMATION AND BELIEF.
Judgment and order affirmed. We concur: MYRICK, J.; MoRRISON, C. J. (2 Cal.
Unrep. 532) McKINNEY v. Roberts. (No. 9,342.)" Filed September 23, 1885. 1.
COMPLAINT IN SLANDER—ALLEGATIONS ON INFORMATION AND BELIEF.
Page 6
For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion the judgment is affirmed. ... that
the acts necessary to the perfection of the appeal were not done in the order
prescribed in the statute is immaterial, if they are all done within the prescribed
time.
For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion the judgment is affirmed. ... that
the acts necessary to the perfection of the appeal were not done in the order
prescribed in the statute is immaterial, if they are all done within the prescribed
time.
Page 7
There is no doubt that the reasons assigned by the court for making the order of
dismissal were wholly insufficient. ... It was there held that— “To effectuate an
appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace, three things are necessary,
viz.
There is no doubt that the reasons assigned by the court for making the order of
dismissal were wholly insufficient. ... It was there held that— “To effectuate an
appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace, three things are necessary,
viz.
Page 11
The defendant's counsel in their brief contend that proper notice of an appeal
was given from the judgment of the court below, as well as from its order denying
a new trial. We do not so understand that notice, and are of opinion that by no fair
...
The defendant's counsel in their brief contend that proper notice of an appeal
was given from the judgment of the court below, as well as from its order denying
a new trial. We do not so understand that notice, and are of opinion that by no fair
...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
affidavit affirmed agent alleged amount answer Appeal from superior assignment Atchison county attorney authority Blue Rapids bond cause of action charge claim Code commenced complaint concur constitution contract conveyance corporation counsel creditors damages debt deed defendant's demurrer district court election entitled evidence execution fact favor fence fendant Filed November fraud garnishee Harper county held injury instruction intoxicating issued judgment and order jury Kansas Kansas Pacific Railway land legislature liable Marion county ment mortgage motion N. W. Rep negligence notice objection Osage county owner paid party payment person petition plaintiff in error possession premises proceedings promissory note prosecution purchase question railroad company reason recover respondent reversed road sheriff statute of limitations sufficient superior court supreme court sustained testified testimony thereof tion Topeka township trial verdict void witness
Bibliographic information
| Title | The Pacific Reporter, Volume 8 National reporter system: State series The Pacific Reporter, California. Superior Courts |
| Contributors | California. Supreme Court, Colorado. Supreme Court, Kansas. Supreme Court, Oregon. Supreme Court, Nevada. Supreme Court, Idaho. Supreme Court, Montana. Supreme Court, Washington Territory. Supreme Court, Washington (State). Supreme Court, Wyoming. Supreme Court, Utah. Supreme Court, West Publishing Company, New Mexico. Supreme Court, Oklahoma. Supreme Court, Colorado. Court of Appeals, Kansas. Court of Appeals, Oklahoma. Criminal Court of Appeals, California. District Courts of Appeal |
| Publisher | West Publishing Company, 1886 |
| Original from | University of Minnesota |
| Digitized | 14 Jul 2014 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |