The Pacific Reporter, Volume 8West Publishing Company, 1886 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 2
FORCIBLE DETAINER—IEASE AS EVIDENCE IN. In an action for forcible
detainer, brought by a lessee, his lease is admissible in evidence, in connection
with his former possession, to show the extent of his possession and his right
thereto.
FORCIBLE DETAINER—IEASE AS EVIDENCE IN. In an action for forcible
detainer, brought by a lessee, his lease is admissible in evidence, in connection
with his former possession, to show the extent of his possession and his right
thereto.
Page 8
BILL TO QUIET TITLE AND CANCEL DEED-EVIDENCE. In an action to quiet title
to lands which are claimed as part of the estate of a decedent, and to cancel a
deed thereof made by him to his father just preceding his death, where the issue
...
BILL TO QUIET TITLE AND CANCEL DEED-EVIDENCE. In an action to quiet title
to lands which are claimed as part of the estate of a decedent, and to cancel a
deed thereof made by him to his father just preceding his death, where the issue
...
Page 13
The schedule of plaintiff's separate property recorded in the office of the county
recorder, November 13, 1877, was properly admitted in evidence. The Civil Code
, §§ 165, 166, provides for filing and recording the separate personal property of
...
The schedule of plaintiff's separate property recorded in the office of the county
recorder, November 13, 1877, was properly admitted in evidence. The Civil Code
, §§ 165, 166, provides for filing and recording the separate personal property of
...
Page 17
MARKET WA UE, PROOF OF. Evidence reviewed, and held, that the market
value of the wheat, the subject of the controversy, was sufficiently shown by the
evidence, and in conformity with the rule prescribed by statute. Civil Code Cal.
3354.
MARKET WA UE, PROOF OF. Evidence reviewed, and held, that the market
value of the wheat, the subject of the controversy, was sufficiently shown by the
evidence, and in conformity with the rule prescribed by statute. Civil Code Cal.
3354.
Page 20
The evidence tended to show that this sum was necessarily expended by plaintiff
in preparing the wheat not delivered for shipment. As the wheat was never
delivered to plaintiff, this item, if objected to at the proper time, would doubtless
have ...
The evidence tended to show that this sum was necessarily expended by plaintiff
in preparing the wheat not delivered for shipment. As the wheat was never
delivered to plaintiff, this item, if objected to at the proper time, would doubtless
have ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirmed agent alleged allowed amount answer appeal application assignment attachment attorney authority bond cause charge claim Code complaint concur consideration constitute construction contract corporation court damages deed defendant denied district court duty effect election entered entitled error evidence execution fact favor filed follows further give given ground held injury instruction intent interest issued judgment jury Kansas land limitations ment mortgage motion N. W. Rep necessary negligence notice objection offered opinion Osage county owner paid party payment person petition plaintiff possession present proceedings proper prove purchase question railroad company reason received record recover referred refused rendered respondent reversed road rule statute sufficient sustained taken term testimony thereof tion trial verdict witness
Bibliographic information
| Title | The Pacific Reporter, Volume 8 National reporter system: State series The Pacific Reporter, California. Superior Courts |
| Contributors | California. Supreme Court, Colorado. Supreme Court, Kansas. Supreme Court, Oregon. Supreme Court, Nevada. Supreme Court, Idaho. Supreme Court, Montana. Supreme Court, Washington Territory. Supreme Court, Washington (State). Supreme Court, Wyoming. Supreme Court, Utah. Supreme Court, West Publishing Company, New Mexico. Supreme Court, Oklahoma. Supreme Court, Colorado. Court of Appeals, Kansas. Court of Appeals, Oklahoma. Criminal Court of Appeals, California. District Courts of Appeal |
| Publisher | West Publishing Company, 1886 |
| Original from | University of Minnesota |
| Digitized | 14 Jul 2014 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |