The Pacific Reporter, Volume 8West Publishing Company, 1886 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 1
From the findings of the court it appeared that recovery on the first note was, as
claimed in the answer, barred by limitation under section 337, Code Civil Proc.
The recitals of facts in those findings negative the existence of all other defenses
set ...
From the findings of the court it appeared that recovery on the first note was, as
claimed in the answer, barred by limitation under section 337, Code Civil Proc.
The recitals of facts in those findings negative the existence of all other defenses
set ...
Page 25
It was proper, for such purpose, to propound the questions and show by the
answers that the witness was a de facto officer and stockholder in the corporation
. The answer of defendants, that the action was not commenced and is not ...
It was proper, for such purpose, to propound the questions and show by the
answers that the witness was a de facto officer and stockholder in the corporation
. The answer of defendants, that the action was not commenced and is not ...
Page 51
But, whether a defendant relies upon his equities merely as a defense to the
ejectment, or alleges them in a cross-bill and bases on them a prayer for
equitable relief, the facts must be fully set forth in the answer; as fully as it would
be ...
But, whether a defendant relies upon his equities merely as a defense to the
ejectment, or alleges them in a cross-bill and bases on them a prayer for
equitable relief, the facts must be fully set forth in the answer; as fully as it would
be ...
Page 64
By their answer, the defendants alleged that the defendant D. L. Moulton, being
at the time financially embarrassed, was advised by the plaintiff, who was his
attorney, for the purpose and with the intent to delay his creditors, to transfer and
...
By their answer, the defendants alleged that the defendant D. L. Moulton, being
at the time financially embarrassed, was advised by the plaintiff, who was his
attorney, for the purpose and with the intent to delay his creditors, to transfer and
...
Page 66
QUO WARRANTo FoR UsurpATION OF FRANCHISE—ANswer: IN. In quo
warranto proceedings for usurpation of a corporate franchise, if the verified
complaint alleges facts showing the illegality of the pretended corporation, such
facts must ...
QUO WARRANTo FoR UsurpATION OF FRANCHISE—ANswer: IN. In quo
warranto proceedings for usurpation of a corporate franchise, if the verified
complaint alleges facts showing the illegality of the pretended corporation, such
facts must ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
affidavit affirmed agent alleged amount answer Appeal from superior assignment Atchison county attorney authority Blue Rapids bond cause of action charge claim Code commenced complaint concur constitution contract conveyance corporation counsel creditors damages debt deed defendant's demurrer district court election entitled evidence execution fact favor fence fendant Filed November fraud garnishee Harper county held injury instruction intoxicating issued judgment and order jury Kansas Kansas Pacific Railway land legislature liable Marion county ment mortgage motion N. W. Rep negligence notice objection Osage county owner paid party payment person petition plaintiff in error possession premises proceedings promissory note prosecution purchase question railroad company reason recover respondent reversed road sheriff statute of limitations sufficient superior court supreme court sustained testified testimony thereof tion Topeka township trial verdict void witness
Bibliographic information
| Title | The Pacific Reporter, Volume 8 National reporter system: State series The Pacific Reporter, California. Superior Courts |
| Contributors | California. Supreme Court, Colorado. Supreme Court, Kansas. Supreme Court, Oregon. Supreme Court, Nevada. Supreme Court, Idaho. Supreme Court, Montana. Supreme Court, Washington Territory. Supreme Court, Washington (State). Supreme Court, Wyoming. Supreme Court, Utah. Supreme Court, West Publishing Company, New Mexico. Supreme Court, Oklahoma. Supreme Court, Colorado. Court of Appeals, Kansas. Court of Appeals, Oklahoma. Criminal Court of Appeals, California. District Courts of Appeal |
| Publisher | West Publishing Company, 1886 |
| Original from | University of Minnesota |
| Digitized | 14 Jul 2014 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |