The Pacific Reporter, Volume 8West Publishing Company, 1886 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 1
9,978.) Filed September 17, 1885. 1. ALLEGATIONS OF COMPLAINT—EFFECT
ON PERSON NOT PARTY. A party in one action is not bound by allegations in a
complaint in another action to which he is not party. 2. JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
9,978.) Filed September 17, 1885. 1. ALLEGATIONS OF COMPLAINT—EFFECT
ON PERSON NOT PARTY. A party in one action is not bound by allegations in a
complaint in another action to which he is not party. 2. JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
Page 2
Its allegations were not binding on the plaintiff here. It was filed in an action which
was dismissed before that at bar was brought. The parties to the two actions were
not identical. The fifth point made by the defendants for the first time in this ...
Its allegations were not binding on the plaintiff here. It was filed in an action which
was dismissed before that at bar was brought. The parties to the two actions were
not identical. The fifth point made by the defendants for the first time in this ...
Page 3
COMPLAINT IN SLANDER—ALLEGATIONS ON INFORMATION AND BELIEF. ...
SEARLs, C. Plaintiffs are husband and wife, and this is an action to recover
damages for slanderous words alleged to have been spoken of and concerning
the ...
COMPLAINT IN SLANDER—ALLEGATIONS ON INFORMATION AND BELIEF. ...
SEARLs, C. Plaintiffs are husband and wife, and this is an action to recover
damages for slanderous words alleged to have been spoken of and concerning
the ...
Page 37
Money alleged to have been “illegally and erroneously” collected for licenses
cannot be recovered back, if the complaint shows that the several sums sued for
were voluntarily paid, and not for or on account of any property taxes assessed.
Money alleged to have been “illegally and erroneously” collected for licenses
cannot be recovered back, if the complaint shows that the several sums sued for
were voluntarily paid, and not for or on account of any property taxes assessed.
Page 67
for usurpation of a corporate franchise, was instituted was at one time acting as
an officer of the alleged corporation, will not operate as an estoppel against the
maintenance of the action by the attorney general. Commissioners' decision.
for usurpation of a corporate franchise, was instituted was at one time acting as
an officer of the alleged corporation, will not operate as an estoppel against the
maintenance of the action by the attorney general. Commissioners' decision.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
affidavit affirmed agent alleged amount answer Appeal from superior assignment Atchison county attorney authority Blue Rapids bond cause of action charge claim Code commenced complaint concur constitution contract conveyance corporation counsel creditors damages debt deed defendant's demurrer district court election entitled evidence execution fact favor fence fendant Filed November fraud garnishee Harper county held injury instruction intoxicating issued judgment and order jury Kansas Kansas Pacific Railway land legislature liable Marion county ment mortgage motion N. W. Rep negligence notice objection Osage county owner paid party payment person petition plaintiff in error possession premises proceedings promissory note prosecution purchase question railroad company reason recover respondent reversed road sheriff statute of limitations sufficient superior court supreme court sustained testified testimony thereof tion Topeka township trial verdict void witness
Bibliographic information
| Title | The Pacific Reporter, Volume 8 National reporter system: State series The Pacific Reporter, California. Superior Courts |
| Contributors | California. Supreme Court, Colorado. Supreme Court, Kansas. Supreme Court, Oregon. Supreme Court, Nevada. Supreme Court, Idaho. Supreme Court, Montana. Supreme Court, Washington Territory. Supreme Court, Washington (State). Supreme Court, Wyoming. Supreme Court, Utah. Supreme Court, West Publishing Company, New Mexico. Supreme Court, Oklahoma. Supreme Court, Colorado. Court of Appeals, Kansas. Court of Appeals, Oklahoma. Criminal Court of Appeals, California. District Courts of Appeal |
| Publisher | West Publishing Company, 1886 |
| Original from | University of Minnesota |
| Digitized | 14 Jul 2014 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |