The Pacific Reporter, Volume 8West Publishing Company, 1886 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 1
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED. No error appearing in the record, judgment affirmed.
Commissioners' decision. Department 2. Appeal from superior court, Los Angeles
county. F. H. Howard and J. R. Scott, for appellant. David Lyon and Howard d ...
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED. No error appearing in the record, judgment affirmed.
Commissioners' decision. Department 2. Appeal from superior court, Los Angeles
county. F. H. Howard and J. R. Scott, for appellant. David Lyon and Howard d ...
Page 2
The record shows no error, and the judgment and order should be affirmed. We
concur: SEARLs, C.; BELCHER, C. C. BY THE CourT. For the reasons given in
the foregoing opinion the judgment and order are affirmed. (67 Cal. 451)
MURPHY ...
The record shows no error, and the judgment and order should be affirmed. We
concur: SEARLs, C.; BELCHER, C. C. BY THE CourT. For the reasons given in
the foregoing opinion the judgment and order are affirmed. (67 Cal. 451)
MURPHY ...
Page 3
Judgment and order affirmed. We concur: MYRICK, J.; MoRRISON, C. J. (2 Cal.
Unrep. 532) McKINNEY v. Roberts. (No. 9,342.)" Filed September 23, 1885. 1.
COMPLAINT IN SLANDER—ALLEGATIONS ON INFORMATION AND BELIEF.
Judgment and order affirmed. We concur: MYRICK, J.; MoRRISON, C. J. (2 Cal.
Unrep. 532) McKINNEY v. Roberts. (No. 9,342.)" Filed September 23, 1885. 1.
COMPLAINT IN SLANDER—ALLEGATIONS ON INFORMATION AND BELIEF.
Page 5
We think the judgment of the court below should be modified by striking out the
sum of $100 allowed as counsel fees, and that in all other respects it should be
affirmed. We concur: Foot'E, C.; BELCHER, C. C. BY THE CourT. For the reasons
...
We think the judgment of the court below should be modified by striking out the
sum of $100 allowed as counsel fees, and that in all other respects it should be
affirmed. We concur: Foot'E, C.; BELCHER, C. C. BY THE CourT. For the reasons
...
Page 6
The judgment of the court below should be affirmed. We concur: SEARLs, C.;
BELCHER, C. C. By THE CoURT. For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion
the judgment is affirmed. (68 Cal. 24) HALL v. SUPERIOR CourT of EL DoRADo
Co ...
The judgment of the court below should be affirmed. We concur: SEARLs, C.;
BELCHER, C. C. By THE CoURT. For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion
the judgment is affirmed. (68 Cal. 24) HALL v. SUPERIOR CourT of EL DoRADo
Co ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirmed agent alleged allowed amount answer appeal application assignment attachment attorney authority bond cause charge claim Code complaint concur consideration constitute construction contract corporation court damages deed defendant denied district court duty effect election entered entitled error evidence execution fact favor filed follows further give given ground held injury instruction intent interest issued judgment jury Kansas land limitations ment mortgage motion N. W. Rep necessary negligence notice objection offered opinion Osage county owner paid party payment person petition plaintiff possession present proceedings proper prove purchase question railroad company reason received record recover referred refused rendered respondent reversed road rule statute sufficient sustained taken term testimony thereof tion trial verdict witness