The Pacific Reporter, Volume 8West Publishing Company, 1886 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page i
THE PACIFIC REPORTER, VOLUME 8, CONTAINING ALL THE DECISIONS OF
THE SUPREME COURTS OF California, Colorado, Kansas, Oregon, Nevada,
Arizona, Idaho, Montana, Washington, Wyoming, Utah, and New Mexico.
THE PACIFIC REPORTER, VOLUME 8, CONTAINING ALL THE DECISIONS OF
THE SUPREME COURTS OF California, Colorado, Kansas, Oregon, Nevada,
Arizona, Idaho, Montana, Washington, Wyoming, Utah, and New Mexico.
Page iv
473 Dayton, S. & G. R. R. Co., Powell City of Kansas v. Collins (Kan.)... 865 v. (Or.
). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 544 City of Napa, Easterby v. (Cal.). . . . 600 | De
Koslowski, Yesler v. (Wash. T.) 493 City of Oakland, Shearer v. (Cal.)... 384 Dent
v.
473 Dayton, S. & G. R. R. Co., Powell City of Kansas v. Collins (Kan.)... 865 v. (Or.
). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 544 City of Napa, Easterby v. (Cal.). . . . 600 | De
Koslowski, Yesler v. (Wash. T.) 493 City of Oakland, Shearer v. (Cal.)... 384 Dent
v.
Page vi
43 Paul, Cullum v. (Ariz.)..... . . . . . . . . 187 Peavey, Kansas Pac. Ry. Co. v. (Kan.)...
. . . . . . . . ... . . ............. 780 Pellier v. Gillespie (Cal.)........... 185 Perry v. Brainard (
Cal.). . . . . . . . . . . . 882 People v. Brick (Cal.).............. 858 People v. Devon (Cal.).
43 Paul, Cullum v. (Ariz.)..... . . . . . . . . 187 Peavey, Kansas Pac. Ry. Co. v. (Kan.)...
. . . . . . . . ... . . ............. 780 Pellier v. Gillespie (Cal.)........... 185 Perry v. Brainard (
Cal.). . . . . . . . . . . . 882 People v. Brick (Cal.).............. 858 People v. Devon (Cal.).
Page 78
182. For a husband is not allowed to return, to the injury of his creditors, money
given him by his wife to be used in his business, unless a loan. Bailey v. Kansas
Manuf"g Co., 3 Pac. Rep. 756. Where a wife had made advances to her husband
...
182. For a husband is not allowed to return, to the injury of his creditors, money
given him by his wife to be used in his business, unless a loan. Bailey v. Kansas
Manuf"g Co., 3 Pac. Rep. 756. Where a wife had made advances to her husband
...
Page 102
That the donation in question formed no part of the estate of the deceased cannot
be doubted; and that the rights of the plaintiffs, as executors, are limited to the
estate of their testate seems to us equally clear. SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.
That the donation in question formed no part of the estate of the deceased cannot
be doubted; and that the rights of the plaintiffs, as executors, are limited to the
estate of their testate seems to us equally clear. SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirmed agent alleged allowed amount answer appeal application assignment attachment attorney authority bond cause charge claim Code complaint concur consideration constitute construction contract corporation court damages deed defendant denied district court duty effect election entered entitled error evidence execution fact favor filed follows further give given ground held injury instruction intent interest issued judgment jury Kansas land limitations ment mortgage motion N. W. Rep necessary negligence notice objection offered opinion Osage county owner paid party payment person petition plaintiff possession present proceedings proper prove purchase question railroad company reason received record recover referred refused rendered respondent reversed road rule statute sufficient sustained taken term testimony thereof tion trial verdict witness