The Pacific Reporter, Volume 8West Publishing Company, 1886 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 7
Page iv
70 Central Pac. R. Co., Brown v. (Cal.) 828 Page Crescent Mill & Transp. Co. v.
Hayes Cal 692 al.). ... (Cal.) 37 County of Harper, State v. (Kan.)... 417 County of
Lake v. Sulphur Bank Quicksilver Min. Co. (Cal.). . . . . . . 593 County of Marshall v.
70 Central Pac. R. Co., Brown v. (Cal.) 828 Page Crescent Mill & Transp. Co. v.
Hayes Cal 692 al.). ... (Cal.) 37 County of Harper, State v. (Kan.)... 417 County of
Lake v. Sulphur Bank Quicksilver Min. Co. (Cal.). . . . . . . 593 County of Marshall v.
Page vii
533 Phoenix Ins. Co. of Brooklyn, Sullivan V. (Kan.)................... 112 Pierce v.
Guittard (Cal.)........... 645 Pittsburg R. Co., People v. (Cal.)... 381 Pontious, Durein
v. (Kan.)........ ' ... County of Harper (Kan.)... 417 State v. Frew (Kan.)... . . . . . . .......
420 ...
533 Phoenix Ins. Co. of Brooklyn, Sullivan V. (Kan.)................... 112 Pierce v.
Guittard (Cal.)........... 645 Pittsburg R. Co., People v. (Cal.)... 381 Pontious, Durein
v. (Kan.)........ ' ... County of Harper (Kan.)... 417 State v. Frew (Kan.)... . . . . . . .......
420 ...
Page 34
Appeal from superior court, San Joaquin county. ... Harper v. Rowe, 53 Cal. 236;
Treadwell v. Patterson, 51 Cal. 637. There was nothing in the law which imposed
a tax in invitum upon property which gave the right to charge this additional sum ...
Appeal from superior court, San Joaquin county. ... Harper v. Rowe, 53 Cal. 236;
Treadwell v. Patterson, 51 Cal. 637. There was nothing in the law which imposed
a tax in invitum upon property which gave the right to charge this additional sum ...
Page 37
Section 3S04, Pol. Code, which the plaintiff relied on to support his contention,
does not apply to an action of this kind; and no rule of law authorizes him to
recover. Harper v. Rowe, 53 Cal. 234; Loomis v. County of Los Angeles, 59 Cal.
456.
Section 3S04, Pol. Code, which the plaintiff relied on to support his contention,
does not apply to an action of this kind; and no rule of law authorizes him to
recover. Harper v. Rowe, 53 Cal. 234; Loomis v. County of Los Angeles, 59 Cal.
456.
Page 417
BoARD OF CounTY COM'Rs oF HARPER Co. Filed November 7, 1885. COUNTY
—LOCATION OF COUNTY-SEAT—ELECTIONS. Where a county was organized
in 1873, and the county-seat was permanently located by a vote of the electors ...
BoARD OF CounTY COM'Rs oF HARPER Co. Filed November 7, 1885. COUNTY
—LOCATION OF COUNTY-SEAT—ELECTIONS. Where a county was organized
in 1873, and the county-seat was permanently located by a vote of the electors ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
affidavit affirmed agent alleged amount answer Appeal from superior assignment Atchison county attorney authority Blue Rapids bond cause of action charge claim Code commenced complaint concur constitution contract conveyance corporation counsel creditors damages debt deed defendant's demurrer district court election entitled evidence execution fact favor fence fendant Filed November fraud garnishee Harper county held injury instruction intoxicating issued judgment and order jury Kansas Kansas Pacific Railway land legislature liable Marion county ment mortgage motion N. W. Rep negligence notice objection Osage county owner paid party payment person petition plaintiff in error possession premises proceedings promissory note prosecution purchase question railroad company reason recover respondent reversed road sheriff statute of limitations sufficient superior court supreme court sustained testified testimony thereof tion Topeka township trial verdict void witness
Bibliographic information
| Title | The Pacific Reporter, Volume 8 National reporter system: State series The Pacific Reporter, California. Superior Courts |
| Contributors | California. Supreme Court, Colorado. Supreme Court, Kansas. Supreme Court, Oregon. Supreme Court, Nevada. Supreme Court, Idaho. Supreme Court, Montana. Supreme Court, Washington Territory. Supreme Court, Washington (State). Supreme Court, Wyoming. Supreme Court, Utah. Supreme Court, West Publishing Company, New Mexico. Supreme Court, Oklahoma. Supreme Court, Colorado. Court of Appeals, Kansas. Court of Appeals, Oklahoma. Criminal Court of Appeals, California. District Courts of Appeal |
| Publisher | West Publishing Company, 1886 |
| Original from | University of Minnesota |
| Digitized | 14 Jul 2014 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |