The Pacific Reporter, Volume 8West Publishing Company, 1886 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 359
Filed November 7, 1885. 1. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW–RETROSPECTIVE LAW
IMPOSING LEGAL LIABILITY ON TOWNSHIP. - It is necessary, in order to enable
the legislature by retrospective legislation to impose a legal liability upon the ...
Filed November 7, 1885. 1. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW–RETROSPECTIVE LAW
IMPOSING LEGAL LIABILITY ON TOWNSHIP. - It is necessary, in order to enable
the legislature by retrospective legislation to impose a legal liability upon the ...
Page 367
(34 Kan. 379) CITY OF ATCHISON and others v. STATE ex rel. TUFTs, as acting
County Attorney of Atchison County, Kansas. DILGERT and others v. SAME.
ATCHISON NAT. BANK, of ATCHISON, KANSAs, v. SAME. Filed November 7,
1885.
(34 Kan. 379) CITY OF ATCHISON and others v. STATE ex rel. TUFTs, as acting
County Attorney of Atchison County, Kansas. DILGERT and others v. SAME.
ATCHISON NAT. BANK, of ATCHISON, KANSAs, v. SAME. Filed November 7,
1885.
Page 385
Filed November 7, 1885. 1. W:Era" OF PUBLIC ROAD RUNNING THROUGH
GOVERNMENT ANDS. A public road cannot be established by prescription or
limitation while the land over which the road runs belongs to the United States. 2.
Filed November 7, 1885. 1. W:Era" OF PUBLIC ROAD RUNNING THROUGH
GOVERNMENT ANDS. A public road cannot be established by prescription or
limitation while the land over which the road runs belongs to the United States. 2.
Page 390
Jacksonville, 15 Ill. 236. The judgment of the district court will be reversed, and
cause remanded for further proceedings. (All the justices concurring.) {34 Kan.
302) RHoDEs v. SMITH. Filed November 7, 1885. 390 PACIFIC REPORTER. [
Kan.
Jacksonville, 15 Ill. 236. The judgment of the district court will be reversed, and
cause remanded for further proceedings. (All the justices concurring.) {34 Kan.
302) RHoDEs v. SMITH. Filed November 7, 1885. 390 PACIFIC REPORTER. [
Kan.
Page 391
Filed November 7, 1885. Error from Linn county. James D. Snoddy, for plaintiff in
error. W. R. Biddle and Selwyn Douglas, for defendant in error. PER CURLAM.
As several of the questions just decided in Smith v. Smith, ante, 385, are involved
...
Filed November 7, 1885. Error from Linn county. James D. Snoddy, for plaintiff in
error. W. R. Biddle and Selwyn Douglas, for defendant in error. PER CURLAM.
As several of the questions just decided in Smith v. Smith, ante, 385, are involved
...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirmed agent alleged allowed amount answer appeal application assignment attachment attorney authority bond cause charge claim Code complaint concur consideration constitute construction contract corporation court damages deed defendant denied district court duty effect election entered entitled error evidence execution fact favor filed follows further give given ground held injury instruction intent interest issued judgment jury Kansas land limitations ment mortgage motion N. W. Rep necessary negligence notice objection offered opinion Osage county owner paid party payment person petition plaintiff possession present proceedings proper prove purchase question railroad company reason received record recover referred refused rendered respondent reversed road rule statute sufficient sustained taken term testimony thereof tion trial verdict witness