Bruff v. Cobbold 597 De Wolf v. Archangel Maritime Bank and Insurance Company (L. Rep. 9 Q. B. 451; 43 L. J. 147, Q.B.) 605 Carter, re; ex parte Jacobs (L. Rep. 17 Eq. 575) Eastwood (app.) v. Millar (resp.) (L. Rep. 9 Q. B. 716 Ellis v. Great Western Railway Company 874 447 City of Cambridge, The (L. Rep. 4 Adm. & Ecc. 161 and 5 Priv. Co. App. 451; 43 L. J. 6, Adm.)...... 439 Colonial Bank of Australia v. Willan (L. Rep. 5 Priv. Co. App. 417; 43 L. J. 39, Priv. Co.) Clergy Orphan Corporation (L. Rep. 18 Eq. 280) Clifford v. Hoare (L. Rep. 9 C. P. 362) Cline's Trust Estate, re (L. Rep. 18 Eq. 213) 806 237 Cooper v. Cooper (43 L. J. 158, Ch.) 409 Finney, re; ex parte Goater 620 43 L. J. 113, Bank.) 739 Fox v. Gascoigne 743 Credland v. Potter (43 L. J. 484, Ch.). 356 France, re; ex parte Tinker (43 L. J. 91, Bank.) 615, 806 Crowley's Claim; Lacy v. Hill (L. Rep. 18 Eq. 182; 43 L. J. 551, Ch.)! 484 Frederick (L. Rep. 3 Prob. & Div. 196; 43 L. J. 767 O. S. Butler, The (L. Rep. 4 Adm. & Ecc. 178). D. D'Arc v. London and North-Western Railway Com- Gainsford v. Dunn (L. Rep. 17 Eq. 405; 43 L. J. 763 403, Ch.) Davies v. Duncan and others (L. Rep. 9 C. P. 396; 283 37 339 451 PLAINTIFFS. Metzler v. Gounod ......page 4 367 213 Meynell (falsely called Bull) v. Bull... Mill v. Hawker and others and Wickett (43 L. J. Limehouse Works Company, re (L. Rep. 17 Eq. 169, and 9 Ch. App. 266; 43 L. J. 483, Ch.) Little v. Roberts Littledale's case; re Hoylake Railway Company (L. Rep. 9 Ch. App. 257; 43 L. J. 529, Ch.) Littler, re; ex parte Manchester and Liverpool District Banking Company (L. Rep. 18 Eq. 249; 43 L. J. 73, Bank.) Liverpool Civil Service and Public Supply Association (Limited) re; ex parte Greenwood (L. Rep. 9 Ch. App. 511; 43 L. J. 609, Ch.) Lockwood v. Wilson and another (43 L. J. 179,C. P.) 761 London Financial Association (Limited) v. Wrex ham, Mold, and Connah's Quay Railway Company 491 Lord v. Price (L. Rep. 9 Ex. 54; 43 L. J. 49, Ex.) 271 Love, ex parte; re Jagger (L. Rep. 17 Eq. 454; 43 Minet v. Morgan.. Miriam, The page 43 264 345 77 129, Ex.) 894 Miller v. David (L. Rep. 9 C. P. 118; 43 L. J. 84, C. P.) 58 669 537 |