Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, Volume 44Published for John Conrad and Company, 1845 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 84
Page 8
... Oliver et al . v . Piatt Permoli v . First Municipality Piatt , Oliver et al . v . Pollard's Lessee v . Hagan Poultney et al . v . City of La Fayette Prentiss , Ross v . Prescott et al . , The United States v . Price v . Sessions · 717 ...
... Oliver et al . v . Piatt Permoli v . First Municipality Piatt , Oliver et al . v . Pollard's Lessee v . Hagan Poultney et al . v . City of La Fayette Prentiss , Ross v . Prescott et al . , The United States v . Price v . Sessions · 717 ...
Page 332
... lien unless there is a prior act of the legislature to protect him from it . 12 Wheat . 80. The second question there- fore is answered in the negative . WILLIAM OLIVER AND MICAJAH T. WILLIAMS AND OTHERS , APPELLANTS 332 SUPREME COURT .
... lien unless there is a prior act of the legislature to protect him from it . 12 Wheat . 80. The second question there- fore is answered in the negative . WILLIAM OLIVER AND MICAJAH T. WILLIAMS AND OTHERS , APPELLANTS 332 SUPREME COURT .
Page 333
United States. Supreme Court. WILLIAM OLIVER AND MICAJAH T. WILLIAMS AND OTHERS , APPELLANTS , v . ROBERT PLATT . In cases of trust , where the trustee has violated his trust by an ... OLIVER AND MICAJAH T. WILLIAMS AND OTHERS, APPELLANTS...
United States. Supreme Court. WILLIAM OLIVER AND MICAJAH T. WILLIAMS AND OTHERS , APPELLANTS , v . ROBERT PLATT . In cases of trust , where the trustee has violated his trust by an ... OLIVER AND MICAJAH T. WILLIAMS AND OTHERS, APPELLANTS...
Page 334
... Oliver , ( one of the plaintiffs in er- ror , ) Andrew Mack and Jesse Hunt . What the articles of agreement were between the members of the Piatt Company the record did not show . On the 7th of June , 1817 , the Baum Company entered ...
... Oliver , ( one of the plaintiffs in er- ror , ) Andrew Mack and Jesse Hunt . What the articles of agreement were between the members of the Piatt Company the record did not show . On the 7th of June , 1817 , the Baum Company entered ...
Page 335
United States. Supreme Court. Oliver et al . v . Piatt . jointly and equally liable . And we do further agree that William C. Schenck , William Barr , and William Oliver shall be our agents to explore the lands and make the purchases ...
United States. Supreme Court. Oliver et al . v . Piatt . jointly and equally liable . And we do further agree that William C. Schenck , William Barr , and William Oliver shall be our agents to explore the lands and make the purchases ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
4th section acres act of Congress action admitted aforesaid amount appeal assignment authority bank bankrupt bankruptcy Baum bill brevet certificate Circuit Court claim claimant collector common law Constitution contract court of equity creditors debts decision declared decree deed defendants in error District Court duties entitled equity evidence execution exemption feme covert fieri facias filed grant intended issued John judge judgment jurisdiction jury Justice legislature Lessee libel lien lots Louisiana mandamus Martin Baum ment Mississippi mortgage objection Ohio Oliver opinion paid parties passed patent payment Pennsylvania person Peters petition Piatt Company plaintiff in error Port Lawrence Company possession proceedings public lands purchase quarter-section question record repeal road rule scire facias sold statute suit Supreme Court survey territory testator thereof tion toll tracts trust United void Washington county William writ of error
Popular passages
Page 607 - No person demeaning himself in a peaceable and orderly manner, shall ever be molested on account of his mode of worship or religious sentiments, in the said territory.
Page 223 - To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such district (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased, by the consent of the legislature of the State in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful 'buildings.
Page 34 - An act for ascertaining and adjusting the titles and claims to land within the Territory of Orleans and the District of Louisiana, ' shall have made their reports and the decision of Congress been had thereon.
Page 105 - And that either of the justices of the Supreme Court, as well as judges of the District Courts, shall have power to grant writs of habeas corpus, for the purpose of an inquiry into the cause of commitment.
Page 222 - And whenever any of the said states shall have sixty thousand free inhabitants therein, such state shall be admitted, by its delegates, into the Congress of the United States, on an equal footing with the original states, in all respects whatever, and shall be at liberty to form a permanent constitution and state government...
Page 229 - It is the power to regulate; that is, to prescribe the rule by which commerce is to be governed. This power, like all others vested in Congress, is complete in itself, may be exercised to its utmost extent, and acknowledges no limitations other than are prescribed in the Constitution.
Page 221 - Virginia inclusive according to their usual respective proportions in the general charge and expenditure and shall be faithfully and bona fide disposed of for that purpose and for no other use or purpose whatsoever.
Page 313 - ... and to all acts, matters, and things to be done under and in virtue of the bankruptcy, until the final distribution and settlement of the estate of the bankrupt, and the close of the proceedings in bankruptcy.
Page 762 - Where a court has jurisdiction, it has a right to decide every question which occurs in the cause; and, whether its decision be correct or otherwise, its judgment, until reversed, is regarded as binding in every other court : but, if it act without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void.
Page 179 - The state governments have no right to tax any of the constitutional means employed by the government of the Union to execute its constitutional powers.