THE OFFENDERS PROBATION ACT OF 1886 JAMES C. BEAL, GOVERNMENT PRINTER, WILLIAM STREET. 1887. C+ INTRODUCTION. "THE JUSTICES ACT OF 1886." PREVIOUS to the passage of the Justices Act the principal statutes in force in Queensland relating to the powers and authorities of Justices of the Peace were those known as "Jervis's Acts"-11 and 12 Vic. c. 42, 11 and 12 Vic. c. 43, and 11 and 12 Vic. c. 44-together with the statute of New South Wales (14 Vic. No. 43) which adopted them, and the subsequent amendments of it (17 Vic. No. 39 and 37 Vic. No. 4). Some years ago Sir James Cockle, the late learned Chief Justice of Queensland, was induced before his departure from the Colony to undertake the task of consolidating and simplifying the language of these Acts, and under his direction a series of Bills was drawn for that purpose, each dealing with a separate branch of the law relating to Justices. The present Act is founded upon his work, but includes many important alterations in the law not contemplated by him. The framers of the Act have considered it more convenient to embody the whole law in one statute, and have adopted the more modern form in which Acts of Parliament are now drawn. After many revisions the Bill was first brought into the Legislative Council in September, 1885, and was most favourably received. It passed its various stages with no material alterations and was transmitted to the Legislative Assembly, but owing to the pressure of business and the lateness of the session did not then become law. During the recess it was again carefully revised and underwent some slight modifications in form. It was presented to the Assembly on the 15th of July, 1886, and having passed both Houses was assented to on the 13th of October. Although the Act may fairly be considered more simple than Jervis's Acts, so that it may be expected that Justices will have no difficulty in its interpretation, still it is hoped that the following The Justices Act is divided into ten Parts. Part I. is preliminary. The offences cognizable by Justices are of three kinds-indictable offences, simple offences, and breaches of duty. So much of the preliminary procedure as is common to all of them is included in Part IV. To a large extent the jurisdiction in indictable offences is limited to hearing the matter of the complaint, up to and including the com- mittal or discharge. In some cases, however, Justices have power to punish summarily. The former class are dealt with in Part V., the latter in Part VII. Their jurisdiction in cases of simple offences and breaches of duty is unlimited, subject to appeal to a higher court. The subject of simple offences and breaches of duty is dealt with in Part VI., and that of appeals in Part IX. Another portion of the ancient jurisdiction of Justices is that of requiring sureties of the peace and for good behaviour. The provisions respecting this jurisdiction, the exercise of which has hitherto been accompanied by some doubts, and by many anomalies, which this Act seeks to remove, are contained in Part VIII. Part X. supplements the provisions of Part III., and ensures generally the Part I. provides for the repeal of the statutes specified in the The interpretation clause (s. 4) contains, in accordance with and "Breach of Duty," special attention should be given, because the arrangement of the Act is, to some extent, based upon them. They are as follows:: "Indictable Offence "-An offence which may be prosecuted before the Supreme Court, or other Court having jurisdiction in that behalf, by information in the name of the Attorney-General or other authorised officer. 'Simple Offence "-Any offence (indictable or not) punishable, on summary conviction before Justices, by fine, imprisonment, or otherwise. "Breach of Duty "-Any act or omission (not being a simple offence or a non-payment of a mere debt) upon complaint whereof Justices may make an order on any person for the payment of money, or for doing, or refraining from doing, any other act. The use of the two latter definitions-which correspond substantially with the terms délit and contravention used in French law—was suggested by Sir James Cockle, although the terms used by him were somewhat different. If we except the jurisdiction in cases of surety of the peace and for good behaviour, the provisions respecting which are preventive rather than remedial, then every offence with which Justices may deal is included in one of these three classes. The value of the definitions will be at once apparent upon a perusal of the Act. PART II.-JUSTICES. Justices may be appointed by General Commission of the Peace under the Great Seal, or specially by the Governor in Council (s. 6). Members of the Executive Council, and Judges of the Supreme Court and District Court (s. 10) are Justices ex officio, as are also Chairmen, for the time being, of Municipal Districts (s. 8), but only for their districts. Justices may be Justices for the whole Colony, or may have a jurisdiction limited to a specified district, outside which they must be careful not to act, except in a few cases referred to below. Up to the present time, however, no limited Commission has been issued, and the Justices of limited jurisdiction have been only the chairmen of municipal districts acting as Justices by virtue of their office. |