Annual Report of the Illinois State Bar AssociationThe Association, 1899 - Bar associations |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 57
Page 5
... consideration of the matters falling within their jurisdictions respectively , or may have been referred to them respectively . Committee reports shall be in writing , signed by the Chairman ; but such reports shall show what members ...
... consideration of the matters falling within their jurisdictions respectively , or may have been referred to them respectively . Committee reports shall be in writing , signed by the Chairman ; but such reports shall show what members ...
Page 39
... consideration . MR . MOSES : I second the motion ; it ought to include the order for printing - it has already been done , however . MR . ORENDORFF : Is that an amendment to the motion ? MR . GREGORY : It will be printed , any way . GEN ...
... consideration . MR . MOSES : I second the motion ; it ought to include the order for printing - it has already been done , however . MR . ORENDORFF : Is that an amendment to the motion ? MR . GREGORY : It will be printed , any way . GEN ...
Page 43
... consideration . As to Mr. Rosenthal's suggestion , I do not understand that because this is referred to the committee now to be appointed we are thereby prevented from taking action upon any of the particular matters independently of ...
... consideration . As to Mr. Rosenthal's suggestion , I do not understand that because this is referred to the committee now to be appointed we are thereby prevented from taking action upon any of the particular matters independently of ...
Page 46
... consideration by the Legislature . Bills that are prepared by this Association , or are en- dorsed by them are usually sent to the Judiciary Committee of the Senate and House and if , upon appointment , the mem- bers of this Association ...
... consideration by the Legislature . Bills that are prepared by this Association , or are en- dorsed by them are usually sent to the Judiciary Committee of the Senate and House and if , upon appointment , the mem- bers of this Association ...
Page 48
... consideration and discussion . MR . SHERMAN : I rise simply to ask the ruling of the Chair upon the proposition as to whether the motion to re refer to a committee was in any way to be considered as an adoption . I heartily agree with ...
... consideration and discussion . MR . SHERMAN : I rise simply to ask the ruling of the Chair upon the proposition as to whether the motion to re refer to a committee was in any way to be considered as an adoption . I heartily agree with ...
Contents
111 | |
135 | |
141 | |
170 | |
179 | |
186 | |
193 | |
4 | |
16 | |
47 | |
84 | |
125 | |
4 | |
6 | |
8 | |
25 | |
87 | |
92 | |
105 | |
23 | |
29 | |
30 | |
39 | |
51 | |
55 | |
69 | |
74 | |
80 | |
101 | |
109 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action ADOLPH MOSES adopted amendment American Bar Association appeal Appellate Court Applause appointed attorney BENSON WOOD bill Building Chicago Chair Chairman Charles Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Springfield Chief Justice Circuit Court commission common law Constitution Cook county corporation Dearborn Street dishonor drawer Executive Committee favor Galesburg gentlemen George George W Henry holder Home Insurance Building honor Illinois State Bar indorsement John JUDGE BRADWELL JUDGE GROSS judgment Julius Rosenthal jurisdiction jury Law Reform lawyer legislation Legislature Marquette Building MATHENY matter MCNULTA Metropolitan Block Monadnock Building monopoly NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW notice Obituary Memoranda opinion ORENDORFF party payable payment person point of order practice present PROCEEDINGS question Rookery Section session SHERMAN SPECIAL ADDRESS Springfield statute Street Chicago Supreme Court thereof Thomas tion Title and Trust trial Trust Building Unity Building VICE PRESIDENT WOOD William York Life Building
Popular passages
Page 106 - Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due course ; but when it is shown that the title of any person who has negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden is on the holder to prove that he or some person under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course.
Page 115 - Where a negotiable instrument is materially altered without the assent of all parties liable thereon, it is avoided, except as against a party who has himself made, authorized or assented to the alteration, and subsequent indorsers.
Page 101 - ... the delivery may be shown to have been conditional or for a special purpose only and not for the purpose of transferring the property in the instrument.
Page 102 - Where the instrument contains or a person adds to his signature words indicating that he signs for or on behalf of a principal, or in a representative capacity, he is not liable on the instrument if he was duly authorized; but the mere addition of words describing him as an agent, or as filling a representative character, without disclosing his principal, does not exempt him from personal liability.
Page 110 - Except as herein otherwise provided, when a negotiable instrument has been dishonored by nonacceptance or nonpayment, notice of dishonor must be given to the drawer and to each indorser, and any drawer or indorser to whom such notice is not given is discharged.
Page 106 - The title of a person who negotiates an instrument is defective within the meaning of this Act when he obtained the instrument, or any signature thereto, by fraud, duress, or force and fear, or other unlawful means, or for an illegal consideration or when he negotiates it in breach of faith, or under such circumstances as amount to a fraud.
Page 105 - That it is complete and regular upon its face; 2. That he became the holder of it before it was overdue, and without notice that it had been previously dishonored, if such was the fact; 3. That he took it in good faith and for value; 4. That at the time it was negotiated to him he had no notice of any infirmity in the instrument or defect in the title of the person negotiating it.
Page 108 - As respects one another, indorsers are liable prima facie in the order in which they indorse; but evidence is admissible to show that as between or among themselves they have agreed otherwise. Joint payees or joint indorsees who indorse are deemed to indorse jointly and severally.
Page 117 - The holder may refuse to take a qualified acceptance, and if he does not obtain an unqualified acceptance, he may treat the bill as dishonored by non-acceptance. Where a qualified acceptance is taken, the drawer and indorsers are discharged from liability on the bill, unless they have expressly or impliedly authorized the holder to take a qualified acceptance, or subsequently assent thereto.
Page 123 - A check of itself does not operate as an assignment of any part of the funds to the credit of the drawer with the bank, and the bank is not liable to the holder, unless and until it accepts or certifies the check.