## Controlled Markov Processes and Viscosity SolutionsThis book is intended as an introduction to optimal stochastic control for continuous time Markov processes and to the theory of viscosity solutions. |

### From inside the book

Results 1-3 of 39

Page 13

In

In

**Theorem 5.1**, x * ( - ) denotes the solution to ( 3.2 ) with u ( . ) u * ( . ) , x * ( t ) = x .**Theorem 5.1**is called a Verification Theorem . Note that , by the definition ( 5.4 ) of H , ( 5.7 ) is equivalent to ( 5.7 " ) u * ( 8 ) ...Page 16

Here q * is the exit time of ( 3 , 2 * ( s ) ) from Q. The proof of Theorem 5.2 is almost the same as for

Here q * is the exit time of ( 3 , 2 * ( s ) ) from Q. The proof of Theorem 5.2 is almost the same as for

**Theorem 5.1**. In ( 5.8 ) the integral is now from t to the exit time t , and W ( 1 , 2 ( T ) ) is on the left side .Page 333

**Theorem 5.1**. Assume V e Cplo ) and ( 5.1 ) . Then V is a viscosity solution of ( 2.7 ) in O. Recall that in Sections II.7 and V.2 , we proved the viscosity property of the value function of other control problems by using Theorem ...### What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

### Contents

Viscosity Solutions | 53 |

Controlled Markov Diffusions in R | 157 |

SecondOrder Case | 213 |

Copyright | |

7 other sections not shown

### Other editions - View all

Controlled Markov Processes and Viscosity Solutions Wendell H. Fleming,Halil Mete Soner Limited preview - 2006 |

Controlled Markov Processes and Viscosity Solutions Wendell H. Fleming,Halil Mete Soner No preview available - 2006 |

### Common terms and phrases

admissible apply approximation assume assumptions boundary condition bounded calculus called Chapter compact condition consider constant continuous control problem convergence convex Corollary corresponding cost defined definition denote depend derivatives deterministic difference discussion dynamic programming equation equivalent estimate Example exists exit fact finite fixed formula given gives Hence holds horizon implies inequality lateral Lemma limit linear Lipschitz Markov Markov diffusion Markov processes maximum measurable method minimizing Moreover nonlinear obtain operator optimal control partial differential equation particular positive principle probability proof prove Recall reference Remark replaced require respectively result satisfies Section Similarly smooth space step stochastic control stochastic differential equation subset sufficiently suitable supersolution Suppose term terminal Theorem 5.1 theory tion uniformly unique value function Verification viscosity solution viscosity subsolution yields